Literature DB >> 31393028

DNA damage kinase signaling: checkpoint and repair at 30 years.

Michael Charles Lanz1, Diego Dibitetto1, Marcus Bustamante Smolka1.   

Abstract

From bacteria to mammalian cells, damaged DNA is sensed and targeted by DNA repair pathways. In eukaryotes, kinases play a central role in coordinating the DNA damage response. DNA damage signaling kinases were identified over two decades ago and linked to the cell cycle checkpoint concept proposed by Weinert and Hartwell in 1988. Connections between the DNA damage signaling kinases and DNA repair were scant at first, and the initial perception was that the importance of these kinases for genome integrity was largely an indirect effect of their roles in checkpoints, DNA replication, and transcription. As more substrates of DNA damage signaling kinases were identified, it became clear that they directly regulate a wide range of DNA repair factors. Here, we review our current understanding of DNA damage signaling kinases, delineating the key substrates in budding yeast and humans. We trace the progress of the field in the last 30 years and discuss our current understanding of the major substrate regulatory mechanisms involved in checkpoint responses and DNA repair.
© 2019 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage response; DNA repair; checkpoint; kinase; mass spectrometry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31393028      PMCID: PMC6745504          DOI: 10.15252/embj.2019101801

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO J        ISSN: 0261-4189            Impact factor:   11.598


  263 in total

1.  Selective induction of E2F1 in response to DNA damage, mediated by ATM-dependent phosphorylation.

Authors:  W C Lin; F T Lin; J R Nevins
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Role for E2F in control of both DNA replication and mitotic functions as revealed from DNA microarray analysis.

Authors:  S Ishida; E Huang; H Zuzan; R Spang; G Leone; M West; J R Nevins
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Mrc1 is a replication fork component whose phosphorylation in response to DNA replication stress activates Rad53.

Authors:  Alexander J Osborn; Stephen J Elledge
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-07-15       Impact factor: 11.361

4.  Rad53 FHA domain associated with phosphorylated Rad9 in the DNA damage checkpoint.

Authors:  Z Sun; J Hsiao; D S Fay; D F Stern
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-07-10       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  ATM-dependent phosphorylation of Mdm2 on serine 395: role in p53 activation by DNA damage.

Authors:  R Maya; M Balass; S T Kim; D Shkedy; J F Leal; O Shifman; M Moas; T Buschmann; Z Ronai; Y Shiloh; M B Kastan; E Katzir; M Oren
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2001-05-01       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  The DNA replication and damage checkpoint pathways induce transcription by inhibition of the Crt1 repressor.

Authors:  M Huang; Z Zhou; S J Elledge
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1998-09-04       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Mec1/Tel1 phosphorylation of the INO80 chromatin remodeling complex influences DNA damage checkpoint responses.

Authors:  Ashby J Morrison; Jung-Ae Kim; Maria D Person; Jessica Highland; Jing Xiao; Tammy S Wehr; Sean Hensley; Yunhe Bao; Jianjun Shen; Sean R Collins; Jonathan S Weissman; Jeff Delrow; Nevan J Krogan; James E Haber; Xuetong Shen
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-08-10       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  The budding yeast Rad9 checkpoint protein is subjected to Mec1/Tel1-dependent hyperphosphorylation and interacts with Rad53 after DNA damage.

Authors:  J E Vialard; C S Gilbert; C M Green; N F Lowndes
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 9.  Safeguarding genome integrity: the checkpoint kinases ATR, CHK1 and WEE1 restrain CDK activity during normal DNA replication.

Authors:  Claus Storgaard Sørensen; Randi G Syljuåsen
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Functional interaction between BLM helicase and 53BP1 in a Chk1-mediated pathway during S-phase arrest.

Authors:  Sagar Sengupta; Ana I Robles; Steven P Linke; Natasha I Sinogeeva; Ran Zhang; Remy Pedeux; Irene M Ward; Arkady Celeste; André Nussenzweig; Junjie Chen; Thanos D Halazonetis; Curtis C Harris
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2004-09-13       Impact factor: 10.539

View more
  66 in total

1.  DNA Damage Response in Xenopus laevis Cell-Free Extracts.

Authors:  Tomas Aparicio Casado; Jean Gautier
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

Review 2.  Cell-cycle phospho-regulation of the kinetochore.

Authors:  Cinzia Klemm; Peter H Thorpe; Guðjón Ólafsson
Journal:  Curr Genet       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 3.886

3.  Spontaneous DNA-RNA hybrids: differential impacts throughout the cell cycle.

Authors:  Belén Gómez-González; Sonia Barroso; Emilia Herrera-Moyano; Andrés Aguilera
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2020-02-16       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  A guiding torch at the poles: the multiple roles of spindle microtubule-organizing centers during cell division.

Authors:  Ana M Rincón; Fernando Monje-Casas
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  The Srs2 helicase dampens DNA damage checkpoint by recycling RPA from chromatin.

Authors:  Nalini Dhingra; Sahiti Kuppa; Lei Wei; Nilisha Pokhrel; Silva Baburyan; Xiangzhou Meng; Edwin Antony; Xiaolan Zhao
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Checkpoint Responses to DNA Double-Strand Breaks.

Authors:  David P Waterman; James E Haber; Marcus B Smolka
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 23.643

7.  DNA damage signaling in the cellular responses to mustard vesicants.

Authors:  Yi-Hua Jan; Diane E Heck; Debra L Laskin; Jeffrey D Laskin
Journal:  Toxicol Lett       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 4.372

8.  Ribosomal S6 protein kinase 4 promotes radioresistance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Ming-Yang Li; Lin-Ni Fan; Dong-Hui Han; Zhou Yu; Jing Ma; Yi-Xiong Liu; Pei-Feng Li; Dan-Hui Zhao; Jia Chai; Lei Jiang; Shi-Liang Li; Juan-Juan Xiao; Qiu-Hong Duan; Jing Ye; Mei Shi; Yong-Zhan Nie; Kai-Chun Wu; Dezhong Joshua Liao; Yu Shi; Yan Wang; Qing-Guo Yan; Shuang-Ping Guo; Xiu-Wu Bian; Feng Zhu; Jian Zhang; Zhe Wang
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  NONO phase separation enhances DNA damage repair by accelerating nuclear EGFR-induced DNA-PK activation.

Authors:  Xin-Juan Fan; Yun-Long Wang; Wan-Wen Zhao; Shao-Mei Bai; Yan Ma; Xin-Ke Yin; Li-Li Feng; Wei-Xing Feng; Ying-Nai Wang; Quentin Liu; Mien-Chie Hung; Xiang-Bo Wan
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 6.166

10.  Phosphoproteomics reveals novel modes of function and inter-relationships among PIKKs in response to genotoxic stress.

Authors:  Sapir Schlam-Babayov; Ariel Bensimon; Michal Harel; Tamar Geiger; Ruedi Aebersold; Yael Ziv; Yosef Shiloh
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.