Literature DB >> 30113557

Intra-Cochlear Electrocochleography During Cochear Implant Electrode Insertion Is Predictive of Final Scalar Location.

Kanthaiah Koka1, William Jason Riggs2, Robert Dwyer3, Jourdan Taylor Holder3, Jack H Noble3, Benoit M Dawant3, Amanda Ortmann4, Carla V Valenzuela4, Jameson K Mattingly2, Michael M Harris5, Brendan P O'Connell6, Leonid M Litvak1, Oliver F Adunka2, Craig Alan Buchman4, Robert F Labadie3.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Electrocochleography (ECochG) patterns observed during cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion may provide information about scalar location of the electrode array.
BACKGROUND: Conventional CI surgery is performed without actively monitoring auditory function and potential damage to intracochlear structures. The central hypothesis of this study was that ECochG obtained directly through the CI may be used to estimate intracochlear electrode position and, ultimately, residual hearing preservation.
METHODS: Intracochlear ECochG was performed on 32 patients across 3 different implant centers. During electrode insertion, a 50-ms tone burst stimulus (500 Hz) was delivered at 110 dB SPL. The ECochG response was monitored from the apical-most electrode. The amplitude and phase changes of the first harmonic were imported into an algorithm in an attempt to predict the intracochlear electrode location (scala tympani [ST], translocation from ST to scala vestibuli [SV], or interaction with basilar membrane). Anatomic electrode position was verified using postoperative computed tomography (CT) with image processing.
RESULTS: CT analysis confirmed 25 electrodes with ST position and 7 electrode arrays translocating from ST into SV. The ECochG algorithm correctly estimated electrode position in 26 (82%) of 32 subjects while 6 (18%) electrodes were wrongly identified as translocated (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 77%, positive predictive value = 54%, and a negative predictive value = 100%). Greater hearing loss was observed postoperatively in participants with translocated electrode arrays (36 ± 15 dB) when compared with isolated ST insertions (28 ± 20 dB HL). This result, however, was not significant (p = 0.789).
CONCLUSION: Intracochlear ECochG may provide information about CI electrode location and hearing preservation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30113557      PMCID: PMC6097527          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001906

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  27 in total

1.  DPOAE group delays versus electrophysiological measures of cochlear delay in normal human ears.

Authors:  R Schoonhoven; V F Prijs; S Schneider
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The excitatory process in the cochlea.

Authors:  H DAVIS; C FERNANDEZ; D R McAULIFFE
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1950-10       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Impact of Intrascalar Electrode Location, Electrode Type, and Angular Insertion Depth on Residual Hearing in Cochlear Implant Patients: Preliminary Results.

Authors:  George B Wanna; Jack H Noble; Rene H Gifford; Mary S Dietrich; Alex D Sweeney; Dongqing Zhang; Benoit M Dawant; Alejandro Rivas; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Cochlear response telemetry: intracochlear electrocochleography via cochlear implant neural response telemetry pilot study results.

Authors:  Luke Campbell; Arielle Kaicer; Robert Briggs; Stephen O'Leary
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Implications of minimizing trauma during conventional cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Matthew L Carlson; Colin L W Driscoll; René H Gifford; Geoffrey J Service; Nicole M Tombers; Becky J Hughes-Borst; Brian A Neff; Charles W Beatty
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Real-Time Intracochlear Electrocochleography Obtained Directly Through a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Michael S Harris; William Jason Riggs; Kanthaiah Koka; Leonid M Litvak; Prashant Malhotra; Aaron C Moberly; Brendan P O'Connell; Jourdan Holder; Federico Alberto Di Lella; Carlos Mario Boccio; George B Wanna; Robert F Labadie; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Intraoperative Real-time Cochlear Response Telemetry Predicts Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Luke Campbell; Arielle Kaicer; David Sly; Claire Iseli; Benjamin Wei; Robert Briggs; Stephen O'Leary
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.311

8.  Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Charles C Finley; Jill B Firszt; Timothy A Holden; Christine Brenner; Lisa G Potts; Brenda D Gotter; Sallie S Vanderhoof; Karen Mispagel; Gitry Heydebrand; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Round window electrocochleography before and after cochlear implant electrode insertion.

Authors:  Oliver F Adunka; Christopher K Giardina; Eric J Formeister; Baishakhi Choudhury; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Intra- and Postoperative Electrocochleography May Be Predictive of Final Electrode Position and Postoperative Hearing Preservation.

Authors:  Brendan P O'Connell; Jourdan T Holder; Robert T Dwyer; René H Gifford; Jack H Noble; Marc L Bennett; Alejandro Rivas; George B Wanna; David S Haynes; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  12 in total

1.  Relationship Between Intraoperative Electrocochleography and Hearing Preservation.

Authors:  Thomas Lenarz; Andreas Buechner; Bruce Gantz; Marlan Hansen; Viral D Tejani; Robert Labadie; Brendan O'Connell; Craig Alan Buchman; Carla V Valenzuela; Oliver F Adunka; Michael S Harris; William J Riggs; Douglas Fitzpatrick; Kanthaiah Koka
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.311

2.  Impact of stimulus frequency and recording electrode on electrocochleography in Hybrid cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Rachael L Carroll; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 3.  Electrocochleography in cochlear implantation: Development, applications, and future directions.

Authors:  Jason H Barnes; Linda X Yin; Aniket A Saoji; Matthew L Carlson
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-06-04

4.  Intracochlear Electrocochleography and Speech Perception Scores in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Carla V Valenzuela; Jeffery T Lichtenhan; Shannon M Lefler; Kanthaiah Koka; Craig A Buchman; Amanda J Ortmann
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.970

Review 5.  Review on cochlear implant electrode array tip fold-over and scalar deviation.

Authors:  Anandhan Dhanasingh; Claude Jolly
Journal:  J Otol       Date:  2019-01-09

6.  Simultaneous Intra- and Extracochlear Electrocochleography During Cochlear Implantation to Enhance Response Interpretation.

Authors:  Leanne Sijgers; Flurin Pfiffner; Julian Grosse; Norbert Dillier; Kanthaiah Koka; Christof Röösli; Alexander Huber; Adrian Dalbert
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

7.  Evaluation of cochlear implant electrode scalar position by 3 Tesla magnet resonance imaging.

Authors:  C Riemann; L U Scholtz; H B Gehl; M Schürmann; H Sudhoff; I Todt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Suitable Electrode Choice for Robotic-Assisted Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review of Manual Electrode Insertion Adverse Events.

Authors:  Paul Van de Heyning; Peter Roland; Luis Lassaletta; Sumit Agrawal; Marcus Atlas; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner; Kevin Brown; Marco Caversaccio; Stefan Dazert; Wolfgang Gstoettner; Rudolf Hagen; Abdulrahman Hagr; Greg Eigner Jablonski; Mohan Kameswaran; Vladislav Kuzovkov; Martin Leinung; Yongxin Li; Andreas Loth; Astrid Magele; Robert Mlynski; Joachim Mueller; Lorne Parnes; Andreas Radeloff; Chris Raine; Gunesh Rajan; Joachim Schmutzhard; Henryk Skarzynski; Piotr H Skarzynski; Georg Sprinzl; Hinrich Staecker; Timo Stöver; Dayse Tavora-Viera; Vedat Topsakal; Shin-Ichi Usami; Vincent Van Rompaey; Nora M Weiss; Wilhelm Wimmer; Mario Zernotti; Javier Gavilan
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-24

9.  Electrocochleography in Cochlear Implant Users with Residual Acoustic Hearing: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jeong-Seo Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-26       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Establishing Reproducibility and Correlation of Cochlear Microphonic Amplitude to Implant Electrode Position Using Intraoperative Electrocochleography and Postoperative Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Andrew Soulby; Steve Connor; Dan Jiang; Terry Nunn; Patrick Boyle; Irumee Pai
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.