Literature DB >> 11325122

DPOAE group delays versus electrophysiological measures of cochlear delay in normal human ears.

R Schoonhoven1, V F Prijs, S Schneider.   

Abstract

Group delays of 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were determined using both f1- and f2-sweep paradigms in 24 normal-hearing subjects. These DPOAE group delays were studied in comparison with cochlear delays estimated from derived band VIIIth nerve compound action potentials (CAPs) and auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) in the same subjects. The center frequencies of the derived bands in the electrophysiological experiment were matched with the f2-frequencies in the DPOAE recording to ensure that DPOAEs and derived CAPs and ABRs were generated at the same places along the cochlear partition, thus allowing for a direct comparison. The degree to which DPOAE group delays are larger in the f2- than in the f1-sweep paradigm is consistent with a theoretical analysis of the so-called wave-fixed model. Both DPOAE group delays are highly correlated with CAP- and ABR-derived measures of cochlear delay. The principal result of this study is that "roundtrip" DPOAE group delay in the f1-sweep paradigm is exactly twice as large as the neural estimate of the "forward" cochlear delay. The interpretation of this notion in the context of cochlear wave propagation properties and DPOAE-generating mechanisms is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11325122     DOI: 10.1121/1.1354987

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Perception of across-frequency asynchrony and the role of cochlear delays.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Fast reverse propagation of sound in the living cochlea.

Authors:  Wenxuan He; Anders Fridberger; Edward Porsov; Tianying Ren
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Comparison of group delays of 2f(1)-f(2) distortion product otoacoustic emissions and cochlear travel times.

Authors:  Mario A Ruggero
Journal:  Acoust Res Lett Online       Date:  2004-10

4.  Temporary hearing loss influences post-stimulus time histogram and single neuron action potential estimates from human compound action potentials.

Authors:  Jeffery T Lichtenhan; Mark E Chertoff
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Rhythm judgments reveal a frequency asymmetry in the perception and neural coding of sound synchrony.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Anahita H Mehta; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Effects of temporal stimulus properties on the perception of across-frequency asynchrony.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Latency of tone-burst-evoked auditory brain stem responses and otoacoustic emissions: level, frequency, and rise-time effects.

Authors:  Daniel M Rasetshwane; Michael Argenyi; Stephen T Neely; Judy G Kopun; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Perception of across-frequency asynchrony by listeners with cochlear hearing loss.

Authors:  Magdalena Wojtczak; Jordan A Beim; Christophe Micheyl; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-04-24

9.  Intra-Cochlear Electrocochleography During Cochear Implant Electrode Insertion Is Predictive of Final Scalar Location.

Authors:  Kanthaiah Koka; William Jason Riggs; Robert Dwyer; Jourdan Taylor Holder; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; Amanda Ortmann; Carla V Valenzuela; Jameson K Mattingly; Michael M Harris; Brendan P O'Connell; Leonid M Litvak; Oliver F Adunka; Craig Alan Buchman; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Basilar membrane vibration is not involved in the reverse propagation of otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  W He; T Ren
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.