Literature DB >> 26859542

Intraoperative Real-time Cochlear Response Telemetry Predicts Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation.

Luke Campbell1, Arielle Kaicer, David Sly, Claire Iseli, Benjamin Wei, Robert Briggs, Stephen O'Leary.   

Abstract

AIM: To monitor cochlear function during cochlear implantation and determine correlations with postoperative acoustic hearing.
BACKGROUND: Cochlear response telemetry measures cochlear function directly from cochlear implant electrodes. We have adapted this system to provide real-time cochlear response telemetry (RT-CRT) monitoring of a patient's acoustic hearing as the cochlear implant electrode array is inserted.
METHODS: Eighteen subjects (1 child and 17 adults) with sloping high frequency hearing loss were implanted with Cochlear Ltd slim straight arrays (CI422/CI522). Tone bursts (500 Hz, 100-110 dB) were presented at 14 Hz continuously during the array insertion. RT-CRT amplitudes were correlated with surgical manoeuvres recorded on the video from the operating microscope and with postoperative pure tone audiograms.
RESULTS: Despite an excellent overall rate of complete or partial hearing preservation (79%), RT-CRT identified that in 47% of these implantations there was transient or permanent reduction in the amplitude of the cochlear microphonic (CM). Patients with a preserved CM at the end of insertion had on average 15 dB better low-frequency hearing preservation. The CM amplitude was most vulnerable during the last few millimeters of insertion or when inadvertent movement of the array occurred after full insertion. Physical contact/elevation of the basilar membrane is hypothesized as a likely mechanism of hearing loss rather than overt physical trauma.
CONCLUSION: RT-CRT can be used to predict early postoperative hearing loss and to potentially refine surgical technique. In the future, feedback of RT-CRT may prove to be a valuable tool for maximizing preservation of residual hearing or providing feedback on electrode contact with the basilar membrane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26859542     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000972

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  29 in total

1.  Postoperative Electrocochleography from Hybrid Cochlear Implant users: An Alternative Analysis Procedure.

Authors:  Jeong-Seo Kim; Viral D Tejani; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Patterns Seen During Electrode Insertion Using Intracochlear Electrocochleography Obtained Directly Through a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Michael S Harris; William J Riggs; Christopher K Giardina; Brendan P O'Connell; Jourdan T Holder; Robert T Dwyer; Kanthaiah Koka; Robert F Labadie; Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Intracochlear Electrocochleography: Influence of Scalar Position of the Cochlear Implant Electrode on Postinsertion Results.

Authors:  William J Riggs; Robert T Dwyer; Jourdan T Holder; Jameson K Mattingly; Amanda Ortmann; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; Carla V Valenzuela; Brendan P O'Connell; Michael S Harris; Leonid M Litvak; Kanthaiah Koka; Craig A Buchman; Robert F Labadie; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Relationship Between Intraoperative Electrocochleography and Hearing Preservation.

Authors:  Thomas Lenarz; Andreas Buechner; Bruce Gantz; Marlan Hansen; Viral D Tejani; Robert Labadie; Brendan O'Connell; Craig Alan Buchman; Carla V Valenzuela; Oliver F Adunka; Michael S Harris; William J Riggs; Douglas Fitzpatrick; Kanthaiah Koka
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Response Changes During Insertion of a Cochlear Implant Using Extracochlear Electrocochleography.

Authors:  Christopher K Giardina; Tatyana E Khan; Stephen H Pulver; Oliver F Adunka; Craig A Buchman; Kevin D Brown; Harold C Pillsbury; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Intracochlear Electrocochleography: Response Patterns During Cochlear Implantation and Hearing Preservation.

Authors:  Christopher K Giardina; Kevin D Brown; Oliver F Adunka; Craig A Buchman; Kendall A Hutson; Harold C Pillsbury; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Impact of stimulus frequency and recording electrode on electrocochleography in Hybrid cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Rachael L Carroll; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Intra-Cochlear Electrocochleography During Cochear Implant Electrode Insertion Is Predictive of Final Scalar Location.

Authors:  Kanthaiah Koka; William Jason Riggs; Robert Dwyer; Jourdan Taylor Holder; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; Amanda Ortmann; Carla V Valenzuela; Jameson K Mattingly; Michael M Harris; Brendan P O'Connell; Leonid M Litvak; Oliver F Adunka; Craig Alan Buchman; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Light sheet microscopy of the gerbil cochlea.

Authors:  Kendall A Hutson; Stephen H Pulver; Pablo Ariel; Caroline Naso; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 3.215

10.  Intracochlear Electrocochleography and Speech Perception Scores in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Carla V Valenzuela; Jeffery T Lichtenhan; Shannon M Lefler; Kanthaiah Koka; Craig A Buchman; Amanda J Ortmann
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.970

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.