Literature DB >> 31678892

Impact of stimulus frequency and recording electrode on electrocochleography in Hybrid cochlear implant users.

Viral D Tejani1, Rachael L Carroll2, Paul J Abbas2, Carolyn J Brown2.   

Abstract

This report explores the impact of recording electrode position and stimulus frequency on intracochlear electrocochleography (ECoG) responses recorded from six Nucleus L24 Hybrid CI users. Acoustic tone bursts (250 Hz, 500 Hz, 750 Hz, and 1000 Hz) were presented to the implanted ear via an insert earphone. Recordings were obtained from intracochlear electrodes 6 (most basal), 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, and 22 (most apical). Responses to condensation and rarefaction stimuli were subtracted from one another to emphasize hair cell responses (CM/DIF) and added to one another to emphasize neural responses (ANN/SUM). For a fixed stimulus frequency, the CM/DIF and ANN/SUM magnitudes increased as the recording electrode moved apically. For a fixed recording electrode, as the stimulus frequency was lowered, response magnitudes increased. The CM/DIF and ANN/SUM response phase were generally stable across recording electrodes, although substantial phase shifts were noted for a few conditions. Given the recent interest in ECoG for assessing peripheral auditory function in CI users, the impact of stimulus frequency and recording electrode position on response magnitude should be considered. Results suggest optimal ECoG responses are obtained using the most apical recording electrode and a low frequency acoustic stimulus (250 Hz or 500 Hz).
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31678892      PMCID: PMC6913176          DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2019.107815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  26 in total

1.  Frequency map for the human cochlear spiral ganglion: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Olga Stakhovskaya; Divya Sridhar; Ben H Bonham; Patricia A Leake
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-02-21

2.  Patterns Seen During Electrode Insertion Using Intracochlear Electrocochleography Obtained Directly Through a Cochlear Implant.

Authors:  Michael S Harris; William J Riggs; Christopher K Giardina; Brendan P O'Connell; Jourdan T Holder; Robert T Dwyer; Kanthaiah Koka; Robert F Labadie; Douglas C Fitzpatrick; Oliver F Adunka
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Cochlear response telemetry: intracochlear electrocochleography via cochlear implant neural response telemetry pilot study results.

Authors:  Luke Campbell; Arielle Kaicer; Robert Briggs; Stephen O'Leary
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Observations of the vibration of the basilar membrane in squirrel monkeys using the Mössbauer technique.

Authors:  W S Rhode
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1971-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Intraoperative Real-time Cochlear Response Telemetry Predicts Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Luke Campbell; Arielle Kaicer; David Sly; Claire Iseli; Benjamin Wei; Robert Briggs; Stephen O'Leary
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Round window electrocochleography before and after cochlear implant electrode insertion.

Authors:  Oliver F Adunka; Christopher K Giardina; Eric J Formeister; Baishakhi Choudhury; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Residual Cochlear Function in Adults and Children Receiving Cochlear Implants: Correlations With Speech Perception Outcomes.

Authors:  Tatyana Elizabeth Fontenot; Christopher Kenneth Giardina; Margaret Dillon; Meredith A Rooth; Holly F Teagle; Lisa R Park; Kevin David Brown; Oliver F Adunka; Craig A Buchman; Harold C Pillsbury; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  An improved method of obtaining electrocochleography recordings from Nucleus Hybrid cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown; Jihwan Woo
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Intra-Cochlear Electrocochleography During Cochear Implant Electrode Insertion Is Predictive of Final Scalar Location.

Authors:  Kanthaiah Koka; William Jason Riggs; Robert Dwyer; Jourdan Taylor Holder; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; Amanda Ortmann; Carla V Valenzuela; Jameson K Mattingly; Michael M Harris; Brendan P O'Connell; Leonid M Litvak; Oliver F Adunka; Craig Alan Buchman; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Intra- and Postoperative Electrocochleography May Be Predictive of Final Electrode Position and Postoperative Hearing Preservation.

Authors:  Brendan P O'Connell; Jourdan T Holder; Robert T Dwyer; René H Gifford; Jack H Noble; Marc L Bennett; Alejandro Rivas; George B Wanna; David S Haynes; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.