Literature DB >> 34019310

Intracochlear Electrocochleography and Speech Perception Scores in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Carla V Valenzuela1, Jeffery T Lichtenhan1, Shannon M Lefler1, Kanthaiah Koka2, Craig A Buchman1, Amanda J Ortmann1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Previous studies have demonstrated that electrocochleography (ECochG) measurements made at the round window prior to cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion can account for 47% of the variability in 6-month speech perception scores. Recent advances have made it possible to use the apical CI electrode to record intracochlear responses to acoustic stimuli. Study objectives were to determine 1) the relationship between intracochlear ECochG response amplitudes and 6-month speech perception scores and 2) to determine the relationship between behavioral auditory thresholds and ECochG threshold estimates. The hypothesis was that intracochlear ECochG response amplitudes made immediately after electrode insertion would be larger than historical controls (at the extracochlear site) and explain more variability in speech perception scores. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective case series.
METHODS: Twenty-two adult CI recipients with varying degrees of low-frequency hearing had intracochlear ECochG measurements made immediately after CI electrode insertion using 110 dB SPL tone bursts. Tone bursts were centered at five octave-spaced frequencies between 125 and 2,000 Hz.
RESULTS: There was no association between intracochlear ECochG response amplitudes and speech perception scores. But, the data suggest a mild to moderate relationship between preoperative behavioral audiometric testing and intraoperative ECochG threshold estimates.
CONCLUSION: Performing intracochlear ECochG is highly feasible and results in larger response amplitudes, but performing ECochG before, rather than after, CI insertion may provide a more accurate assessment of a patient's speech perception potential. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E2681-E2688, 2021.
© 2021 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc..

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrocochleography; cochlear implant performance; intracochlear

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34019310      PMCID: PMC8440360          DOI: 10.1002/lary.29629

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   2.970


  35 in total

1.  Case-control analysis of cochlear implant performance in elderly patients.

Authors:  David R Friedland; Christina Runge-Samuelson; Humera Baig; Jamie Jensen
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-05

2.  Verification of computed tomographic estimates of cochlear implant array position: a micro-CT and histologic analysis.

Authors:  Jessica Teymouri; Timothy E Hullar; Timothy A Holden; Richard A Chole
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Intraoperative monitoring using cochlear microphonics in cochlear implant patients with residual hearing.

Authors:  Andreas Radeloff; Wafaa Shehata-Dieler; Agmal Scherzed; Kristen Rak; Wilma Harnisch; Rudolf Hagen; Robert Mlynski
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Intraoperative Real-time Cochlear Response Telemetry Predicts Hearing Preservation in Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Luke Campbell; Arielle Kaicer; David Sly; Claire Iseli; Benjamin Wei; Robert Briggs; Stephen O'Leary
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.311

5.  Response Changes During Insertion of a Cochlear Implant Using Extracochlear Electrocochleography.

Authors:  Christopher K Giardina; Tatyana E Khan; Stephen H Pulver; Oliver F Adunka; Craig A Buchman; Kevin D Brown; Harold C Pillsbury; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

6.  Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Charles C Finley; Jill B Firszt; Timothy A Holden; Christine Brenner; Lisa G Potts; Brenda D Gotter; Sallie S Vanderhoof; Karen Mispagel; Gitry Heydebrand; Margaret W Skinner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Round window electrocochleography before and after cochlear implant electrode insertion.

Authors:  Oliver F Adunka; Christopher K Giardina; Eric J Formeister; Baishakhi Choudhury; Craig A Buchman; Douglas C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  An improved method of obtaining electrocochleography recordings from Nucleus Hybrid cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Viral D Tejani; Paul J Abbas; Carolyn J Brown; Jihwan Woo
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-01-09       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Intra-Cochlear Electrocochleography During Cochear Implant Electrode Insertion Is Predictive of Final Scalar Location.

Authors:  Kanthaiah Koka; William Jason Riggs; Robert Dwyer; Jourdan Taylor Holder; Jack H Noble; Benoit M Dawant; Amanda Ortmann; Carla V Valenzuela; Jameson K Mattingly; Michael M Harris; Brendan P O'Connell; Leonid M Litvak; Oliver F Adunka; Craig Alan Buchman; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.311

10.  Intra- and Postoperative Electrocochleography May Be Predictive of Final Electrode Position and Postoperative Hearing Preservation.

Authors:  Brendan P O'Connell; Jourdan T Holder; Robert T Dwyer; René H Gifford; Jack H Noble; Marc L Bennett; Alejandro Rivas; George B Wanna; David S Haynes; Robert F Labadie
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  1 in total

1.  Electrocochleography and cognition are important predictors of speech perception outcomes in noise for cochlear implant recipients.

Authors:  Amit Walia; Matthew A Shew; Dorina Kallogjeri; Cameron C Wick; Nedim Durakovic; Shannon M Lefler; Amanda J Ortmann; Jacques A Herzog; Craig A Buchman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.