Literature DB >> 30098025

Development of deep neural network for individualized hepatobiliary toxicity prediction after liver SBRT.

Bulat Ibragimov1, Diego Toesca1, Daniel Chang1, Yixuan Yuan2, Albert Koong3, Lei Xing1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate prediction of radiation toxicity of healthy organs-at-risks (OARs) critically determines the radiation therapy (RT) success. The existing dose-volume histogram-based metric may grossly under/overestimate the therapeutic toxicity after 27% in liver RT and 50% in head-and-neck RT. We propose the novel paradigm for toxicity prediction by leveraging the enormous potential of deep learning and go beyond the existing dose/volume histograms. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: We employed a database of 125 liver stereotactic body RT (SBRT) cases with follow-up data to train deep learning-based toxicity predictor. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were applied to discover the consistent patterns in 3D dose plans associated with toxicities. To enhance the predicting power, we first pretrain the CNNs with transfer learning from 3D CT images of 2644 human organs. CNNs were then trained on liver SBRT cases. Furthermore, nondosimetric pretreatment features, such as patients' demographics, underlying liver diseases, liver-directed therapies, were inputted into the fully connected neural network for more comprehensive prediction. The saliency maps of CNNs were used to estimate the toxicity risks associated with irradiation of anatomical regions of specific OARs. In addition, we applied machine learning solutions to map numerical pretreatment features with hepatobiliary toxicity manifestation.
RESULTS: Among 125 liver SBRT patients, 58 were treated for liver metastases, 36 for hepatocellular carcinoma, 27 for cholangiocarcinoma, and 4 for other histologies. We observed that CNN we able to achieve accurate hepatobiliary toxicity prediction with the AUC of 0.79, whereas combining CNN for 3D dose plan analysis and fully connected neural networks for numerical feature analysis resulted in AUC of 0.85. Deep learning produces almost two times fewer false-positive toxicity predictions in comparison to DVH-based predictions, when the number of false negatives, i.e., missed toxicities, was minimized. The CNN saliency maps automatically estimated the toxicity risks for portal vein (PV) regions. We discovered that irradiation of the proximal portal vein is associated with two times higher toxicity risks (risk score: 0.66) that irradiation of the left portal vein (risk score: 0.31).
CONCLUSIONS: The framework offers clinically accurate tools for hepatobiliary toxicity prediction and automatic identification of anatomical regions that are critical to spare during SBRT.
© 2018 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990SBRTzzm321990; convolutional neural networks; liver cancer; toxicity prediction

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30098025      PMCID: PMC6192047          DOI: 10.1002/mp.13122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  39 in total

Review 1.  Radiation-associated liver injury.

Authors:  Charlie C Pan; Brian D Kavanagh; Laura A Dawson; X Allen Li; Shiva K Das; Moyed Miften; Randall K Ten Haken
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  Oral complications of radiotherapy.

Authors:  James J Sciubba; David Goldenberg
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Shape representation for efficient landmark-based segmentation in 3-d.

Authors:  Bulat Ibragimov; Boštjan Likar; Franjo Pernuš; Tomaž Vrtovec
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Cancer Statistics, 2017.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 5.  Advances in Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Louise J Murray; Laura A Dawson
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-02-20       Impact factor: 5.934

Review 6.  Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysis.

Authors:  Dinggang Shen; Guorong Wu; Heung-Il Suk
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 9.590

7.  Automatic classification of prostate cancer Gleason scores from multiparametric magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Duc Fehr; Harini Veeraraghavan; Andreas Wibmer; Tatsuo Gondo; Kazuhiro Matsumoto; Herbert Alberto Vargas; Evis Sala; Hedvig Hricak; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Magnetic resonance image features identify glioblastoma phenotypic subtypes with distinct molecular pathway activities.

Authors:  Haruka Itakura; Achal S Achrol; Lex A Mitchell; Joshua J Loya; Tiffany Liu; Erick M Westbroek; Abdullah H Feroze; Scott Rodriguez; Sebastian Echegaray; Tej D Azad; Kristen W Yeom; Sandy Napel; Daniel L Rubin; Steven D Chang; Griffith R Harsh; Olivier Gevaert
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 17.956

9.  Multi-Institutional Phase II Study of High-Dose Hypofractionated Proton Beam Therapy in Patients With Localized, Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Theodore S Hong; Jennifer Y Wo; Beow Y Yeap; Edgar Ben-Josef; Erin I McDonnell; Lawrence S Blaszkowsky; Eunice L Kwak; Jill N Allen; Jeffrey W Clark; Lipika Goyal; Janet E Murphy; Milind M Javle; John A Wolfgang; Lorraine C Drapek; Ronald S Arellano; Harvey J Mamon; John T Mullen; Sam S Yoon; Kenneth K Tanabe; Cristina R Ferrone; David P Ryan; Thomas F DeLaney; Christopher H Crane; Andrew X Zhu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Predicting non-small cell lung cancer prognosis by fully automated microscopic pathology image features.

Authors:  Kun-Hsing Yu; Ce Zhang; Gerald J Berry; Russ B Altman; Christopher Ré; Daniel L Rubin; Michael Snyder
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 14.919

View more
  23 in total

1.  Closing the Gap Between Deep Neural Network Modeling and Biomedical Decision-Making Metrics in Segmentation via Adaptive Loss Functions.

Authors:  Hyunseok Seo; Maxime Bassenne; Lei Xing
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  A Deep Learning Model for Predicting Xerostomia Due to Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma in the RTOG 0522 Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Kuo Men; Huaizhi Geng; Haoyu Zhong; Yong Fan; Alexander Lin; Ying Xiao
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Markerless Pancreatic Tumor Target Localization Enabled By Deep Learning.

Authors:  Wei Zhao; Liyue Shen; Bin Han; Yong Yang; Kai Cheng; Diego A S Toesca; Albert C Koong; Daniel T Chang; Lei Xing
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  A novel deep learning model using dosimetric and clinical information for grade 4 radiotherapy-induced lymphopenia prediction.

Authors:  Cong Zhu; Steven H Lin; Xiaoqian Jiang; Yang Xiang; Zayne Belal; Goo Jun; Radhe Mohan
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Technical Note: More accurate and efficient segmentation of organs-at-risk in radiotherapy with convolutional neural networks cascades.

Authors:  Kuo Men; Huaizhi Geng; Chingyun Cheng; Haoyu Zhong; Mi Huang; Yong Fan; John P Plastaras; Alexander Lin; Ying Xiao
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 6.  Machine learning techniques for biomedical image segmentation: An overview of technical aspects and introduction to state-of-art applications.

Authors:  Hyunseok Seo; Masoud Badiei Khuzani; Varun Vasudevan; Charles Huang; Hongyi Ren; Ruoxiu Xiao; Xiao Jia; Lei Xing
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Introduction to machine and deep learning for medical physicists.

Authors:  Sunan Cui; Huan-Hsin Tseng; Julia Pakela; Randall K Ten Haken; Issam El Naqa
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 8.  Artificial intelligence applications for pediatric oncology imaging.

Authors:  Heike Daldrup-Link
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2019-10-16

Review 9.  Artificial intelligence and machine learning for medical imaging: A technology review.

Authors:  Ana Barragán-Montero; Umair Javaid; Gilmer Valdés; Dan Nguyen; Paul Desbordes; Benoit Macq; Siri Willems; Liesbeth Vandewinckele; Mats Holmström; Fredrik Löfman; Steven Michiels; Kevin Souris; Edmond Sterpin; John A Lee
Journal:  Phys Med       Date:  2021-05-09       Impact factor: 2.685

10.  Deep Neural Network With Consistency Regularization of Multi-Output Channels for Improved Tumor Detection and Delineation.

Authors:  Hyunseok Seo; Lequan Yu; Hongyi Ren; Xiaomeng Li; Liyue Shen; Lei Xing
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 10.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.