Literature DB >> 30033938

A full-scale clinical prototype for proton range verification using prompt gamma-ray spectroscopy.

Fernando Hueso-González1, Moritz Rabe, Thomas A Ruggieri, Thomas Bortfeld, Joost M Verburg.   

Abstract

We present a full-scale clinical prototype system for in vivo range verification of proton pencil-beams using the prompt gamma-ray spectroscopy method. The detection system consists of eight LaBr3 scintillators and a tungsten collimator, mounted on a rotating frame. Custom electronics and calibration algorithms have been developed for the measurement of energy- and time-resolved gamma-ray spectra during proton irradiation at a clinical dose rate. Using experimentally determined nuclear reaction cross sections and a GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo simulation, a detailed model of the expected gamma-ray emissions is created for each individual pencil-beam. The absolute range of the proton pencil-beams is determined by minimizing the discrepancy between the measurement and this model, leaving the absolute range of the beam and the elemental concentrations of the irradiated matter as free parameters. The system was characterized in a clinical-like situation by irradiating different phantoms with a scanning pencil-beam. A dose of 0.9 Gy was delivered to a [Formula: see text] cm3 target with a beam current of 2 nA incident on the phantom. Different range shifters and materials were used to test the robustness of the verification method and to calculate the accuracy of the detected range. The absolute proton range was determined for each spot of the distal energy layer with a mean statistical precision of 1.1 mm at a 95% confidence level and a mean systematic deviation of 0.5 mm, when aggregating pencil-beam spots within a cylindrical region of 10 mm radius and 10 mm depth. Small range errors that we introduced were successfully detected and even large differences in the elemental composition do not affect the range verification accuracy. These results show that our system is suitable for range verification during pan class="Species">patient treatments in our upcoming clinical study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30033938      PMCID: PMC6340397          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aad513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  32 in total

1.  Correlation between CT numbers and tissue parameters needed for Monte Carlo simulations of clinical dose distributions.

Authors:  W Schneider; T Bortfeld; W Schlegel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  First clinical application of a prompt gamma based in vivo proton range verification system.

Authors:  Christian Richter; Guntram Pausch; Steffen Barczyk; Marlen Priegnitz; Isabell Keitz; Julia Thiele; Julien Smeets; Francois Vander Stappen; Luca Bombelli; Carlo Fiorini; Lucian Hotoiu; Irene Perali; Damien Prieels; Wolfgang Enghardt; Michael Baumann
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2016-01-13       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Requirements for a Compton camera for in vivo range verification of proton therapy.

Authors:  H Rohling; M Priegnitz; S Schoene; A Schumann; W Enghardt; F Hueso-González; G Pausch; F Fiedler
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Simulation of prompt gamma-ray emission during proton radiotherapy.

Authors:  Joost M Verburg; Helen A Shih; Joao Seco
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Evaluation of Stopping-Power Prediction by Dual- and Single-Energy Computed Tomography in an Anthropomorphic Ground-Truth Phantom.

Authors:  Patrick Wohlfahrt; Christian Möhler; Christian Richter; Steffen Greilich
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Prompt Gamma Imaging for In Vivo Range Verification of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Yunhe Xie; El Hassane Bentefour; Guillaume Janssens; Julien Smeets; François Vander Stappen; Lucian Hotoiu; Lingshu Yin; Derek Dolney; Stephen Avery; Fionnbarr O'Grady; Damien Prieels; James McDonough; Timothy D Solberg; Robert A Lustig; Alexander Lin; Boon-Keng K Teo
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 7.038

7.  Simplified derivation of stopping power ratio in the human body from dual-energy CT data.

Authors:  Masatoshi Saito; Shota Sagara
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  The elemental composition of tumors: kerma data for neutrons.

Authors:  R L Maughan; P J Chuba; A T Porter; E Ben-Josef; D R Lucas
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Characterization of the microbunch time structure of proton pencil beams at a clinical treatment facility.

Authors:  J Petzoldt; K E Roemer; W Enghardt; F Fiedler; C Golnik; F Hueso-González; S Helmbrecht; T Kormoll; H Rohling; J Smeets; T Werner; G Pausch
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  3D prompt gamma imaging for proton beam range verification.

Authors:  E Draeger; D Mackin; S Peterson; H Chen; S Avery; S Beddar; J C Polf
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.609

View more
  20 in total

Review 1.  Proton therapy delivery: what is needed in the next ten years?

Authors:  Andries N Schreuder; Jacob Shamblin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Status and innovations in pre-treatment CT imaging for proton therapy.

Authors:  Patrick Wohlfahrt; Christian Richter
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  First Cerenkov charge-induction (CCI) TlBr detector for TOF-PET and proton range verification.

Authors:  Gerard Ariño-Estrada; Gregory S Mitchell; Hadong Kim; Junwei Du; Sun Il Kwon; Leonard J Cirignano; Kanai S Shah; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Compact Method for Proton Range Verification Based on Coaxial Prompt Gamma-Ray Monitoring: a Theoretical Study.

Authors:  F Hueso-González; T Bortfeld
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2019-07-23

Review 5.  Adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Pablo Botas; Gregory C Sharp; Brian Winey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 6.  Latest developments in in-vivo imaging for proton therapy.

Authors:  Katia Parodi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Secondary Particle Interactions in a Compton Camera Designed for in vivo Range Verification of Proton Therapy.

Authors:  Rajesh Panthi; Paul Maggi; Stephen Peterson; Dennis Mackin; Jerimy Polf; Sam Beddar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2020-10-12

Review 8.  Monte Carlo methods for device simulations in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Hyojun Park; Harald Paganetti; Jan Schuemann; Xun Jia; Chul Hee Min
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 4.174

9.  Anatomic changes in head and neck intensity-modulated proton therapy: Comparison between robust optimization and online adaptation.

Authors:  Arthur Lalonde; Mislav Bobić; Brian Winey; Joost Verburg; Gregory C Sharp; Harald Paganetti
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 6.901

Review 10.  Roadmap: proton therapy physics and biology.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Chris Beltran; Stefan Both; Lei Dong; Jacob Flanz; Keith Furutani; Clemens Grassberger; David R Grosshans; Antje-Christin Knopf; Johannes A Langendijk; Hakan Nystrom; Katia Parodi; Bas W Raaymakers; Christian Richter; Gabriel O Sawakuchi; Marco Schippers; Simona F Shaitelman; B K Kevin Teo; Jan Unkelbach; Patrick Wohlfahrt; Tony Lomax
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-02-26       Impact factor: 4.174

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.