Literature DB >> 28556239

Simplified derivation of stopping power ratio in the human body from dual-energy CT data.

Masatoshi Saito1, Shota Sagara1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The main objective of this study is to propose an alternative parameterization for the empirical relation between mean excitation energies (I-value) and effective atomic numbers (Zeff ) of human tissues, and to present a simplified formulation (which we called DEEDZ-SPR) for deriving the stopping power ratio (SPR) from dual-energy (DE) CT data via electron density (ρe ) and Zeff calibration.
METHODS: We performed a numerical analysis of this DEEDZ-SPR method for the human-body-equivalent tissues of ICRU Report 46, as objects of interest with unknown SPR and ρe . The attenuation coefficients of these materials were calculated using the XCOM photon cross-sections database. We also applied the DEEDZ-SPR conversion to experimental DECT data available in the literature, which was measured for the tissue-characterization phantom using a dual-source CT scanner at 80 kV and 140 kV/Sn.
RESULTS: It was found that the DEEDZ-SPR conversion enables the calculation of SPR simply by means of the weighted subtraction of an electron-density image and a low- or high-kV CT image. The simulated SPRs were in excellent agreement with the reference values over the SPR range from 0.258 (lung) to 3.638 (bone mineral-hydroxyapatite). The relative deviations from the reference SPR were within ±0.6% for all ICRU-46 human tissues, except for the thyroid that presented a -1.1% deviation. The overall root-mean-square error was 0.21%. Application to experimental DECT data confirmed this agreement within the experimental accuracy, which demonstrates the practical feasibility of the method.
CONCLUSIONS: The DEEDZ-SPR conversion method could facilitate the construction of SPR images as accurately as a recent DECT-based calibration procedure of SPR parameterization based directly on the CT numbers in a DECT data set.
© 2017 American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dual-energy CT; effective atomic number; electron density; proton therapy; stopping power ratio

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28556239     DOI: 10.1002/mp.12386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  8 in total

1.  Systematic analysis of the impact of imaging noise on dual-energy CT-based proton stopping power ratio estimation.

Authors:  Hugh H C Lee; Bin Li; Xinhui Duan; Linghong Zhou; Xun Jia; Ming Yang
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Status and innovations in pre-treatment CT imaging for proton therapy.

Authors:  Patrick Wohlfahrt; Christian Richter
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Determination of proton stopping power ratio with dual-energy CT in 3D-printed tissue/air cavity surrogates.

Authors:  Jerimy C Polf; Matthew M Mille; Sina Mossahebi; Haijian Chen; Paul Maggi; Huaiyu Chen-Mayer
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A full-scale clinical prototype for proton range verification using prompt gamma-ray spectroscopy.

Authors:  Fernando Hueso-González; Moritz Rabe; Thomas A Ruggieri; Thomas Bortfeld; Joost M Verburg
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Potential of a Second-Generation Dual-Layer Spectral CT for Dose Calculation in Particle Therapy Treatment Planning.

Authors:  Friderike K Longarino; Antonia Kowalewski; Thomas Tessonnier; Stewart Mein; Benjamin Ackermann; Jürgen Debus; Andrea Mairani; Wolfram Stiller
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-20       Impact factor: 5.738

6.  Comparison of single and dual energy CT for stopping power determination in proton therapy of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Vicki Trier Taasti; Ludvig Paul Muren; Kenneth Jensen; Jørgen Breede Baltzer Petersen; Jesper Thygesen; Anna Tietze; Cai Grau; David Christoffer Hansen
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-04-22

Review 7.  Improving radiation physics, tumor visualisation, and treatment quantification in radiotherapy with spectral or dual-energy CT.

Authors:  Matthijs Ferdinand Kruis
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-07       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Assessment of quantitative information for radiation therapy at a first-generation clinical photon-counting computed tomography scanner.

Authors:  Guyue Hu; Katharina Niepel; Franka Risch; Christopher Kurz; Matthias Würl; Thomas Kröncke; Florian Schwarz; Katia Parodi; Guillaume Landry
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 5.738

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.