Literature DB >> 29977819

Clinical application of accommodating intraocular lens.

You-Ling Liang1, Song-Bai Jia1.   

Abstract

The present review describes recent advances in application of accommodating intraocular lenses (AIOLs). Standard monofocal intraocular lenses (MIOLs) only correct distance vision, while AIOLs are designed to allow both good distance vision and near vision, which is achieved through the contraction and relaxation of ciliary muscles by providing transformation of the axial movement or curvature of the lens. Thus, AIOLs may be a better choice for those patients who demand a higher level of visual performance. Since techniques to analyze the performance of AIOLs have not been standardized, and there is a variety of both subjective and objective methods, it is hard to measure the performance of these intraocular lenses. By evaluating advantages and disadvantages of various AIOLs, and introducing techniques for measurement the performance postoperative, this paper can provide some relative information on choosing the type of AIOLs in the clinic.

Entities:  

Keywords:  accommodating intraocular lenses; amplitude of accommodation

Year:  2018        PMID: 29977819      PMCID: PMC6010372          DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2018.06.22

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 2222-3959            Impact factor:   1.779


  118 in total

1.  Measurement of accommodation after implantation of an accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens.

Authors:  Achim Langenbucher; Stefan Huber; Nhung X Nguyen; Berthold Seitz; Gabriele C Gusek-Schneider; Michael Küchle
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  A comparison of the reliability of dynamic retinoscopy and subjective measurements of amplitude of accommodation.

Authors:  Alejandro Álvarez León; Sandra Milena Medrano; Mark Rosenfield
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2012-01-23       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Visual outcomes and optical performance with a monofocal intraocular lens and a new-generation single-optic accommodating intraocular lens.

Authors:  Jorge L Alió; David P Piñero; Ana B Plaza-Puche
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.351

4.  Fellow-eye comparison of posterior capsule opacification rates after implantation of 1CU accommodating and AcrySof MA30 monofocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Joanne Hancox; David Spalton; Catherine Heatley; Hari Jayaram; Jennifer Yip; James Boyce; John Marshall
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.351

5.  Ultrasound biomicroscopic changes during accommodation in eyes with accommodating intraocular lenses: pilot study and hypothesis for the mechanism of accommodation.

Authors:  Giorgio Marchini; Emilio Pedrotti; Piermattia Sartori; Roberto Tosi
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Is randomisation necessary for measuring defocus curves in pre-presbyopes?

Authors:  Navneet Gupta; Shehzad A Naroo; James S Wolffsohn
Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.077

7.  Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses.

Authors:  M Nakazawa; K Ohtsuki
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 5.258

8.  Refractive Outcomes, Contrast Sensitivity, HOAs, and Patient Satisfaction in Moderate Myopia: Wavefront-Optimized Versus Tissue-Saving PRK.

Authors:  Nader Nassiri; Kourosh Sheibani; Abbas Azimi; Farinaz Mahmoodi Khosravi; Javad Heravian; Abasali Yekta; Hadi Ostadi Moghaddam; Saman Nassiri; Mehdi Yasseri; Nariman Nassiri
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Visual performance with multifocal intraocular lenses: mesopic contrast sensitivity under distance and near conditions.

Authors:  Robert Montés-Micó; Enrique España; Inmaculada Bueno; W Neil Charman; José L Menezo
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Phacoemulsification with Implantation of Accommodating versus Standard Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Mohammad Mehdi Sadoughi; Bahram Einollahi; Danial Roshandel; Mohammad Sarimohammadli; Sepehr Feizi
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Refractive surgery beyond 2020.

Authors:  Marcus Ang; Damien Gatinel; Dan Z Reinstein; Erik Mertens; Jorge L Alió Del Barrio; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  Presbyopia - A Review of Current Treatment Options and Emerging Therapies.

Authors:  James A Katz; Paul M Karpecki; Alexandra Dorca; Sima Chiva-Razavi; Heather Floyd; Elizabeth Barnes; Mark Wuttke; Eric Donnenfeld
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-05-24
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.