Literature DB >> 14711718

Visual performance with multifocal intraocular lenses: mesopic contrast sensitivity under distance and near conditions.

Robert Montés-Micó1, Enrique España, Inmaculada Bueno, W Neil Charman, José L Menezo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate distance and near visual performance under bright (photopic) and dim (mesopic) conditions in patients who had undergone uncomplicated cataract extraction with multifocal or monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) implantation.
DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized, masked, comparative, observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two eyes of 32 patients after zonal-progressive multifocal IOL implantation (Allergan Medical Optics Array SA-40N) and 32 eyes of 32 age-matched patients after monofocal IOL implantation (Allergan Medical Optics SI-40NB). INTERVENTION: All eyes underwent phacoemulsification and IOL implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At 18 months after surgery, the monocular contrast sensitivity (CS) function was measured with sinusoidal grating charts at distance and near, at one photopic luminance level and 2 mesopic luminance levels (85, 5, and 2.5 candelas per square meter).
RESULTS: Under bright conditions, CS at distance in the multifocal group was not statistically different (P>0.01) from that in the monofocal group at any tested grating spatial frequency (1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree [cpd]). At low luminances, distance CS for the multifocal group was worse than that for the monofocal group at the highest test spatial frequencies (12 and 18 cpd; P<0.01). At near, photopic CS in the multifocal group was lower than at distance; patients with only a monofocal distance correction, however, could not detect the test gratings, even at the highest available contrast. With optimal near spectacle additions (i.e., using the distance correction of the multifocal IOL), there were no significant differences between the photopic near CS values for the multifocal and monofocal groups. When the luminance was decreased, near CS at all spatial frequencies was reduced in both groups. Contrast sensitivity in the near-corrected, multifocal group was significantly worse than in the near-corrected, monofocal group at high spatial frequencies (12 and 18 cpd).
CONCLUSIONS: This work supports the findings of earlier authors that the Array multifocal IOL, with its center-distance design, is distance biased. Distance CS is within normal limits under bright photopic conditions but shows deficits at higher spatial frequencies (more than approximately 12 cpd) under dim mesopic conditions. Near CS obtained with the multifocal IOL is below that which can be achieved by an appropriate monofocal near correction, for all spatial frequencies and illumination conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14711718     DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(03)00862-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  26 in total

1.  A new method of cornea modulation with excimer laser for simultaneous correction of presbyopia and ametropia.

Authors:  Detlef Uthoff; Markus Pölzl; Daniel Hepper; Detlef Holland
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Refractive lens exchange with distance-dominant diffractive bifocal intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  José F Alfonso; Luis Fernández-Vega; Susana Ortí; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Stereopsis in bilaterally multifocal pseudophakic patients.

Authors:  Teresa Ferrer-Blasco; David Madrid-Costa; Santiago García-Lázaro; Alejandro Cerviño; Robert Montés-Micó
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  All-distance visual acuity in eyes with a nontinted or a yellow-tinted diffractive multifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Ken Hayashi; Miki Masumoto; Hideyuki Hayashi
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Five-year postoperative outcomes of apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Mami Yoshino; Hiroko Bissen-Miyajima; Keiichiro Minami; Yoko Taira
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-09-28       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 6.  Clinical application of accommodating intraocular lens.

Authors:  You-Ling Liang; Song-Bai Jia
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Initial results of trifocal diffractive IOL implantation.

Authors:  Anna Voskresenskaya; Nadezhda Pozdeyeva; Nicolay Pashtaev; Yevgeniy Batkov; Valeriy Treushnicov; Valentin Cherednik
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Contrast visual acuity after multifocal intraocular lens implantation: aspheric versus spherical design.

Authors:  Jun-Hua Li; Yi-Fan Feng; Yun-E Zhao; Yin-Ying Zhao; Lei Lin
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  Assessment of Vitreous Structure and Visual Function after Neodymium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser Vitreolysis.

Authors:  Justin H Nguyen; Jeannie Nguyen-Cuu; Fei Yu; Kenneth M Yee; Jonathan Mamou; Ronald H Silverman; Jeffrey Ketterling; J Sebag
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Visual function and higher order aberration after implantation of aspheric and spherical multifocal intraocular lenses: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jian-Ping Liu; Fan Zhang; Jiang-Yue Zhao; Li-Wei Ma; Jin-Song Zhang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.