Literature DB >> 17321391

Fellow-eye comparison of posterior capsule opacification rates after implantation of 1CU accommodating and AcrySof MA30 monofocal intraocular lenses.

Joanne Hancox1, David Spalton, Catherine Heatley, Hari Jayaram, Jennifer Yip, James Boyce, John Marshall.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure posterior capsule opacification (PCO) and neodymium:YAG (Nd:YAG) capsulotomy rates between the AcrySof MA30 intraocular lens (IOL) (Alcon) and the 1CU IOL (HumanOptics) in a fellow-eye comparison.
SETTING: Ophthalmology Department, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
METHODS: Thirty patients who had bilateral cataract surgery with a 1CU IOL prospectively randomly allocated to 1 eye and an AcrySof MA30 monofocal IOL to the other eye were examined. Best corrected distance visual acuity was recorded using the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study logMAR chart. Digital retroillumination images of the posterior capsule were taken with the pupil dilated and analyzed with POCO software.
RESULTS: Eyes with the 1CU IOL had significantly higher PCO rates than eyes with the MA30 IOL at all time points. By 2 years after surgery, 50% of eyes with a 1CU IOL had required Nd:YAG capsulotomy compared with no eyes with an MA30 IOL. There was no significant difference in visual acuity at any time point when post Nd:YAG capsulotomy was taken in to account.
CONCLUSIONS: The 1CU IOL has 4 broad optic-haptic junctions where the square-edged barrier is breached; this appeared to allow passage of lens epithelial cells, leading to an increase in PCO. However, the increased PCO cannot be attributed to this alone as the 1CU is hydrophilic, a factor known to be associated with higher PCO rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17321391     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.10.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  6 in total

Review 1.  Clinical application of accommodating intraocular lens.

Authors:  You-Ling Liang; Song-Bai Jia
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Hydrophobic versus hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification: a Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qiong Wu; Yan Li; Lian Wu; Cong-Yi Wang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-06-18       Impact factor: 1.645

Review 3.  Intraocular lens optic edge design for the prevention of posterior capsule opacification after cataract surgery.

Authors:  Sophie Maedel; Jennifer R Evans; Annette Harrer-Seely; Oliver Findl
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-08-16

4.  Effect of hydrophobic acrylic versus hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification: meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ying Li; Jiaxing Wang; Zhuo Chen; Xin Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Budget impact analysis of lens material on the posterior capsule opacification (PCO) as a complication after the cataract surgery.

Authors:  Monika Raulinajtys-Grzybek; Iwona Grabska-Liberek; Aleksandra Opala; Marta Słomka; Michał Chrobot
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2020-06-16

6.  A meta-analysis of Nd:YAG capsulotomy rates for two hydrophobic intraocular lens materials.

Authors:  Mark Von Tress; James S Marotta; Stephen S Lane; Ramesh Sarangapani
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-22
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.