Literature DB >> 15617913

Ultrasound biomicroscopic changes during accommodation in eyes with accommodating intraocular lenses: pilot study and hypothesis for the mechanism of accommodation.

Giorgio Marchini1, Emilio Pedrotti, Piermattia Sartori, Roberto Tosi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To document ciliary body constriction and movement with the Crystalens AT-45 intraocular lens (IOL) (eyeonics) using ultrasound biomicroscopy.
SETTING: Eye Clinic, Department of Neurological and Visual Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
METHODS: Patients with no preexisting ocular conditions other than cataract who agreed to return for follow-up were considered. Twenty eyes of 14 patients with a best corrected visual acuity of 5/10 or worse and a refractive error (spherical equivalent) of +/-1.0 diopter (D) had implantation of a Crystalens AT-45 accommodating IOL. Six patients had bilateral implantation. Ultrasound biomicroscopy was performed postoperatively at 1 and 6 months. Before and during accommodation, the anterior chamber depth (ACD) was measured to assess the endothelium-IOL distance and measure the scleral-ciliary process angle to determine whether there was anterior rotation of the ciliary body. The uncorrected distance acuity, best corrected distance acuity, uncorrected near acuity, distance corrected near acuity, best corrected near acuity, and accommodative amplitude were determined. Analysis was done to determine whether there was a correlation between the accommodative amplitude and the percentage variation in the ACD and scleral-ciliary process angle.
RESULTS: All surgical procedures were uneventful. The mean uncorrected distance acuity at 1 month was 0.8 +/- 0.14 (SD) and remained stable at 6 months. Three of 20 eyes (15%) and 8 of 20 eyes (40%) had a Jaeger acuity of J1 and J3, respectively, without additional power correction. During accommodation, the mean reduction in ACD was 0.32 +/- 0.16 mm at 1 month and 0.33 +/- 0.25 mm at 6 months. The mean narrowing of the scleral-ciliary process angle was 4.32 +/- 1.87 degrees at 1 month and 4.43 +/- 1.85 degrees at 6 months. There was a correlation between accommodative amplitude and a decrease in the ACD (r=0.404) and a decrease in scleral-ciliary process angle (r=0.773).
CONCLUSIONS: Anterior displacement of the Crystalens IOL and corresponding anterior rotation of the ciliary body occurred during near vision. The IOL displacement and rotation were proportional to the accommodation capacity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15617913     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.04.053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  11 in total

1.  Subjective and objective performance of the Lenstec KH-3500 "accommodative" intraocular lens.

Authors:  J S Wolffsohn; S A Naroo; N K Motwani; S Shah; O A Hunt; S Mantry; M Sira; I A Cunliffe; M T Benson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Explaining The Current Role Of High Frequency Ultrasound In Ophthalmic Diagnosis (Ophthalmic Ultrasound).

Authors:  D Jackson Coleman; Ronald H Silverman; Mark J Rondeau; Harriet O Lloyd; Suzanne Daly
Journal:  Expert Rev Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-10-01

Review 3.  Restoration of accommodation: surgical options for correction of presbyopia.

Authors:  Adrian Glasser
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.742

Review 4.  Clinical application of accommodating intraocular lens.

Authors:  You-Ling Liang; Song-Bai Jia
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

5.  Objective measurement of accommodative biometric changes using ultrasound biomicroscopy.

Authors:  Viswanathan Ramasubramanian; Adrian Glasser
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Intraocular lenses for the treatment of age-related cataracts: an evidence-based analysis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2009-10-01

7.  Real and pseudoaccommodation in accommodative lenses.

Authors:  Ioannis G Pallikaris; Georgios A Kontadakis; Dimitra M Portaliou
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-18       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Positional accommodative intraocular lens power error induced by the estimation of the corneal power and the effective lens position.

Authors:  David P Piñero; Vicente J Camps; MarIa L Ramón; Verónica Mateo; Rafael J Pérez-CambrodI
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.848

9.  Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Phacoemulsification with Implantation of Accommodating versus Standard Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Mohammad Mehdi Sadoughi; Bahram Einollahi; Danial Roshandel; Mohammad Sarimohammadli; Sepehr Feizi
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

10.  Clinical evaluation of accommodative intraocular lens implantation in high myopic eyes.

Authors:  Jae Hui Kim; Chun Sung Park; Tae Young Chung; Eui Sang Chung
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.