Literature DB >> 6624824

Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses.

M Nakazawa, K Ohtsuki.   

Abstract

We measured apparent accommodation in 42 pseudophakic eyes (34 patients) after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses. The mean apparent accommodation was 2.03 +/- 1.03 diopters. The mean accommodative power of 16 phakic eyes used as controls was 2.91 +/- 1.29 diopters. The diameter of the pupil appeared to be the most important factor in apparent accommodation--the smaller the pupil, the greater the apparent accommodation. Apparent accommodation was inversely proportional to the pupillary diameter. There was no correlation, however, between apparent accommodation and corrected visual acuity, refractive error, corneal astigmatism, or axial length. There was a negative correlation between apparent accommodation and anterior chamber depth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1983        PMID: 6624824     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)77905-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  25 in total

1.  Anterior capsule-supported intraocular lens. A new lens for small-incision surgery and for sealing the capsular opening.

Authors:  O Nishi; Y Sakka
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 2.  Accommodating intraocular lenses: a critical review of present and future concepts.

Authors:  R Menapace; O Findl; K Kriechbaum; Ch Leydolt-Koeppl
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Subjective and objective performance of the Lenstec KH-3500 "accommodative" intraocular lens.

Authors:  J S Wolffsohn; S A Naroo; N K Motwani; S Shah; O A Hunt; S Mantry; M Sira; I A Cunliffe; M T Benson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03-10       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Pseudophakic accommodation? A study of the stability of capsular bag supported, one piece, rigid tripod, or soft flexible implants.

Authors:  S J Hardman Lea; M P Rubinstein; M P Snead; S M Haworth
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.638

5.  Clinical evaluation of automated refraction in anterior chamber pseudophakia.

Authors:  P Sunder Raj; J R Villada; K Myint; A E Lewis; T Akingbehin
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  The clinical depth of field achievable with trifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses: theoretical considerations and proof of concept clinical results.

Authors:  Ante Barišić; Sudi Patel; Nikica Gabric; Claes G Feinbaum
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 7.  Clinical application of accommodating intraocular lens.

Authors:  You-Ling Liang; Song-Bai Jia
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  Changes of the accommodative amplitude and the anterior chamber depth after implantation of an accommodative intraocular lens.

Authors:  Hanka Schneider; Oliver Stachs; Katja Göbel; Rudolf Guthoff
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-08-17       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  Comparison of objective accommodation in phakic and pseudophakic eyes between age groups.

Authors:  Byunghoon Chung; Seonghee Choi; Yong Woo Ji; Eung Kweon Kim; Kyoung Yul Seo; Tae-Im Kim
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.117

10.  Influence of simple myopic against-the-rule and with-the-rule astigmatism on visual acuity in eyes with monofocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Toshiya Yamamoto; Takahiro Hiraoka; Simone Beheregaray; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 2.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.