Literature DB >> 20870110

Visual outcomes and optical performance with a monofocal intraocular lens and a new-generation single-optic accommodating intraocular lens.

Jorge L Alió1, David P Piñero, Ana B Plaza-Puche.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the visual acuity outcomes and the ocular and intraocular optical quality in patients with a monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) or a new-generation single-optic accommodating IOL.
SETTING: Vissum Corporation, Alicante, Spain.
DESIGN: Comparative case series.
METHODS: Consecutive eyes of bilateral cataract patients were divided into 2 groups. One group had implantation of a monofocal IOL (Acri.Smart 48S) and the other group, of a single-optic accommodating IOL (Crystalens HD). Distance and near visual acuities were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. In addition, postoperative ocular optical quality, intraocular aberrations, and defocus curves were evaluated.
RESULTS: The 20 patients included in the study ranged in age from 50 to 87 years. The monofocal IOL group comprised 24 eyes and the accommodating IOL group, 16 eyes. In both groups, the uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuities improved significantly from preoperatively to postoperatively (P ≤ .03). The distance-corrected near visual acuity also improved significantly in both groups (P ≤ .03); the difference between groups was at the limit of statistical significance (P = .05). The uncorrected near visual acuity was significantly better in the accommodating IOL group (J5 versus J3; P = .01). The defocus curves showed significantly better visual acuity in the accommodating IOL group at several levels of defocus. There were no statistically significant differences between the 2 groups in any intraocular aberrometric coefficient (P ≥ .06).
CONCLUSIONS: The new-generation single-optic accommodating IOL restored distance visual function after cataract surgery and improved near vision. The optical quality with the accommodating IOL was similar to that with the conventional monofocal IOL.
Copyright © 2010 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20870110     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.04.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of visual outcomes and reading performance after bilateral implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses with bilateral monofocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Özge Güngör Akkuş; Ikbal Seza Petriçli
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 2.  Clinical application of accommodating intraocular lens.

Authors:  You-Ling Liang; Song-Bai Jia
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

Review 3.  Axial movement of the dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens for the correction of the presbyopia: optical performance and clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Javier Tomás-Juan; Ane Murueta-Goyena Larrañaga
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2014-09-22

4.  Comparison of through-focus image quality across five presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Jay S Pepose; Daozhi Wang; Griffith E Altmann
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2011-12

5.  Real and pseudoaccommodation in accommodative lenses.

Authors:  Ioannis G Pallikaris; Georgios A Kontadakis; Dimitra M Portaliou
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-18       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Positional accommodative intraocular lens power error induced by the estimation of the corneal power and the effective lens position.

Authors:  David P Piñero; Vicente J Camps; MarIa L Ramón; Verónica Mateo; Rafael J Pérez-CambrodI
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Diffractive multifocal intraocular lens compared to pseudo-accommodative intraocular lens implant for unilateral cataracts in pre-presbyopic patients.

Authors:  Rajesh Subhash Joshi
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013 Jul-Sep

8.  Visual and Refractive Outcomes of Phacoemulsification with Implantation of Accommodating versus Standard Monofocal Intraocular Lenses.

Authors:  Mohammad Mehdi Sadoughi; Bahram Einollahi; Danial Roshandel; Mohammad Sarimohammadli; Sepehr Feizi
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

Review 9.  Correction of presbyopia: An integrated update for the practical surgeon.

Authors:  Marie Joan Therese D Balgos; Veronica Vargas; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

Review 10.  The efficacy of accommodative versus monofocal intraocular lenses for cataract patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hongwei Zhou; Chongyan Zhu; Wenya Xu; Fang Zhou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.