Literature DB >> 15457813

A longitudinal study of changes in evoked otoacoustic emissions and pure-tone thresholds as measured in a hearing conservation program.

Judi A Lapsley Miller1, Lynne Marshall, Laurie M Heller.   

Abstract

Non-linear transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) at 74dB pSPL, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) at 65/45dB SPL and pure-tone audiometry were used to detect noise-induced, inner car changes in a longitudinal study. Repeated-measures ANOVAs were made on the Noise (n=69) and Quiet (n=42) groups. The Noise group's hearing thresholds increased by 1.2 dB and DPOAE amplitude decreased by -0.9 dB. For both groups, TEOAE amplitude decreased by approximately -0.6 dB. Eight of 12 ears with permanent threshold shift (PTS) and 10 of 13 ears with temporary threshold shift (TTS) showed TEOAE decrements or low baseline TEOAE amplitudes. Fewer TTS and PTS ears also showed DPOAE decrements, and there was never a DPOAE decrement without a corresponding TEOAE decrement or low TEOAE baseline. Some TTS ears showed permanent emission decrements. Although otoacoustic emissions show promise in detecting noise-induced inner ear changes, it is premature to use them in hearing conservation programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15457813     DOI: 10.1080/14992020400050040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  15 in total

1.  Age dependence of otoacoustic emissions: the loss of amplitude is primarily caused by age-related hearing loss and not by aging alone.

Authors:  Sebastian Hoth; Katrin Gudmundsdottir; Peter Plinkert
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in human newborns.

Authors:  Radha Kalluri; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  A longitudinal study of changes in distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and pure-tone thresholds in an industrial setting.

Authors:  Antonis Moukos; Dimitrios G Balatsouras; Thomas Nikolopoulos; Pavlos Maragoudakis; Evangelos I Yiotakis; Stavros G Korres; Dimitrios Kandiloros
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Nutrient plasma levels achieved during treatment that reduces noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  Colleen G Le Prell; David F Dolan; David C Bennett; Peter A Boxer
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 7.012

5.  Temporary reduction of distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) immediately following auditory brainstem response (ABR).

Authors:  Anand N Mhatre; Bobby Tajudeen; Elena M Welt; Christopher Wartmann; Glenis R Long; Anil K Lalwani
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-06-25       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Towards a joint reflection-distortion otoacoustic emission profile: Results in normal and impaired ears.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Radha Kalluri
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Exploiting Dual Otoacoustic Emission Sources.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Radha Kalluri
Journal:  AIP Conf Proc       Date:  2015

8.  Noise induced hearing loss and other hearing complaints among musicians of symphony orchestras.

Authors:  E J M Jansen; H W Helleman; W A Dreschler; J A P M de Laat
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 3.015

9.  Reflection- and Distortion-Source Otoacoustic Emissions: Evidence for Increased Irregularity in the Human Cochlea During Aging.

Authors:  Carolina Abdala; Amanda J Ortmann; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-07-02

10.  Prevalence and audiological features in carriers of GJB2 mutations, c.35delG and c.101T>C (p.M34T), in a UK population study.

Authors:  Amanda Hall; Marcus Pembrey; Mark Lutman; Colin Steer; Maria Bitner-Glindzicz
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.