| Literature DB >> 29946072 |
María Callejo1,2,3, Gema Mondejar-Parreño1,2,3, Bianca Barreira1,2,3, José L Izquierdo-Garcia2,4,5, Daniel Morales-Cano1,2,3, Sergio Esquivel-Ruiz1,2,3, Laura Moreno1,2,3, Ángel Cogolludo1,2,3, Juan Duarte6,7, Francisco Perez-Vizcaino8,9,10.
Abstract
We have analysed whether pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) alters the rat faecal microbiota. Wistar rats were injected with the VEGF receptor antagonist SU5416 (20 mg/kg s.c.) and followed for 2 weeks kept in hypoxia (10% O2, PAH) or injected with vehicle and kept in normoxia (controls). Faecal samples were obtained and microbiome composition was determined by 16S rRNA gene sequencing and bioinformatic analysis. No effect of PAH on the global microbiome was found (α- or β-diversity). However, PAH-exposed rats showed gut dysbiosis as indicated by a taxonomy-based analysis. Specifically, PAH rats had a three-fold increase in Firmicutes-to-Bacteroidetes ratio. Within the Firmicutes phylum, there were no large changes in the relative abundance of the bacterial families in PAH. Among Bacteroidetes, all families were less abundant in PAH. A clear separation was observed between the control and PAH clusters based on short chain fatty acid producing bacterial genera. Moreover, acetate was reduced in the serum of PAH rats. In conclusion, faecal microbiota composition is altered as a result of PAH. This misbalanced bacterial ecosystem might in turn play a pathophysiological role in PAH by altering the immunologic, hormonal and metabolic homeostasis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29946072 PMCID: PMC6018770 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-27682-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Hemodynamic and histological changes. (A) Systolic, diastolic and mean PAP, (B) Heart rate, (C) Body weight, (D) RV and LV+S weight, (E) Fulton index [RV/(LV+S)] and (F) percentage of arterial muscularization. (G) Typical hematoxilin-eosin staining of arterial sections (scale bar 50 µm), (H) Medial thickness, (I) An early obliterated lesion (scale bar 50 µm). Results are means ± s.e.m. of 4 animals, **p < 0.05 versus control (Students’ t test for panels A–E and Square Chi test for panel F).
Figure 2Microbial richness and diversity in PH and Principal Coordinate analysis (PCA). (A) Number of species identified. (B) α-diversity in rats in control and PAH rats measured by the Shannon, Chao, Simpsons and PD whole tree indexes. Results are means ± s.e.m. of 4 animals. (C) Unsupervised PCA were carried out to analyse the differences between control and PAH groups. Each principal component describes most of the variation between samples.
Figure 3Phyla composition. (A) Composition of the most abundant bacterial phyla (>0.01%) expressed as a percent of total bacteria (means ± s.e.m. of 4 animals). The inset shows the pie charts for control and PAH. (B) PLS loadings (data shown for phyla representing >0.1% of total bacteria) highlight variable significance to discriminate between PAH and control samples in PLS scores. (C) Tridimensional PLS scores plot. (D) The Firmicutes to Bacteroidetes ratio (F/B ratio) was calculated as a biomarker of gut dysbiosis (means ± s.e.m., n = 4, *p = 0.04 vs control with student’s t-test).
Figure 4Bacterial families within the Firmicutes phylum. (A) Composition of the most abundant bacterial families (>0.01%) expressed as a percent of total bacteria in control and PAH rats (means ± s.e.m. of 4 animals, *p < 0.05 vs control with student’s t-test). (B) PLS loadings (data shown for phyla representing >0.1% of total bacteria) highlight variable significance to discriminate between PAH and control samples in PLS scores. (C) Tridimensional PLS scores plot.
Figure 5Bacterial families within the Bacteroidetes phylum. (A) Composition of the bacterial families expressed as a percent of total bacteria in control and PAH rats (means ± s.e.m. of 4 animals, *p < 0.05 vs control with student’s t-test) (B) PLS loadings (data shown for phyla representing >0.1% of total bacteria) highlight variable significance to discriminate between PAH and control samples in PLS scores. (C) Tridimensional PLS scores plot. (D) Composition of the species within the Odoribacteraceae family and Porphyromonas (means ± s.e.m. of 4 animals, *p < 0.05 vs control with student’s t-test).
Figure 6SCFA and SCFA-producing bacteria. (A) Composition of the acetate-, butyrate- and lactate-producing bacteria in control and PAH rats. Data is the sum of all SCFA-producing genera expressed as a percent of total bacteria (means ± SEM of 4 animals). (B) Acetate, butyrate and lactate in rat serum (AU = arbitrary units, nd = not detected, n = 4, *p < 0.05 vs control student’s t-test). (C–E) Most abundant acetate-, butyrate- and lactate-producing genera (means ± s.e.m. of 4 animals, *p < 0.05 vs control with student’s t-test). (F) PLS loadings (data shown for phyla representing >0.1% of total bacteria) highlight variable significance to discriminate between PAH and control samples in PLS scores. (G) Tridimensional PLS scores plot.