| Literature DB >> 28821814 |
Daiqiong Fang1,2, Ding Shi1,2, Longxian Lv1,2, Silan Gu1,2, Wenrui Wu1,2, Yanfei Chen1,2, Jing Guo1,2, Ang Li1,2, Xinjun Hu1,2, Feifei Guo1,2, Jianzhong Ye1,2, Yating Li1,2, Lanjian Li3,4.
Abstract
The gut microbiota is altered in liver diseases, and several probiotics have been shown to reduce the degree of liver damage. We hypothesized that oral administration of specific Bifidobacterium strains isolated from healthy guts could attenuate liver injury. Five strains were tested in this study. Acute liver injury was induced by D-galactosamine after pretreating Sprague-Dawley rats with the Bifidobacterium strains, and liver function, liver and ileum histology, plasma cytokines, bacterial translocation and the gut microbiome were assessed. Two strains, Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatum LI09 and Bifidobacterium catenulatum LI10, conferred liver protection, as well as alleviated the increase in plasma M-CSF, MIP-1α and MCP-1 and bacterial translocation. They also ameliorated ileal mucosal injury and gut flora dysbiosis, especially the enrichment of the opportunistic pathogen Parasutterella and the depletion of the SCFA-producing bacteria Anaerostipes, Coprococcus and Clostridium XI. Negative correlations were found between MIP-1α / MCP-1 and Odoribacter (LI09 group) and MIP-1α / M-CSF and Flavonifractor (LI10 group). Our results indicate that the liver protection effects might be mediated through gut microbiota modification, which thus affect the host immune profile. The desirable characteristics of these two strains may enable them to serve as potential probiotics for the prevention or adjuvant treatment of liver injury.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28821814 PMCID: PMC5562910 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-09395-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Effects of pretreatment with five Bifidobacterium strains on liver function during D-GalN-induced acute liver injury.
| ALT (U/L) | AST (U/L) | GGT (U/L) | GPDA (U/L) | TBA (µmol/L) | TB (µmol/L) | ALB (g/L) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LI06 (n = 9) | 5005.0 ± 4147.8** | 7505.0 ± 6705.4 | 10.9 ± 8.4* | 303.6 ± 161.9 | 261.6 ± 167.0* | 12.5 ± 10.3 | 37.2 ± 3.1 |
| LI07 (n = 9) | 6340.0 ± 5733.0 | 9135.0 ± 7725.8 | 14.6 ± 13.1 | 318.8 ± 203.9 | 284.6 ± 192.6 | 43.6 ± 83.7 | 36.7 ± 2.9 |
| LI08 (n = 9) | 6431.1 ± 2933.8* | 8200.0 ± 4038.7 | 13.2 ± 6.6* | 356.3 ± 135.3 | 326.0 ± 116.4* | 23.7 ± 12.5 | 36.8 ± 1.5 |
| LI09 (n = 9) | 4191.1 ± 2777.8*** | 5800.0 ± 3601.0** | 13.8 ± 11.4 | 272.4 ± 137.0** | 285.2 ± 136.9* | 17.4 ± 12.8 | 36.8 ± 1.7 |
| LI10 (n = 9) | 3888.9 ± 3190.7*** | 5471.1 ± 4247.0** | 10.8 ± 8.2* | 250.2 ± 151.0** | 274.6 ± 177.0* | 16.3 ± 12.5 | 37.1 ± 2.1 |
| PC (n = 8) | 10000.0 ± 2058.1 | 12050.0 ± 3342.2 | 21.5 ± 9.0 | 427.4 ± 56.3 | 440.1 ± 60.6 | 68.6 ± 88.0 | 34.5 ± 3.7 |
| NC (n = 6) | 49.5 ± 7.8*** | 101.2 ± 12.2*** | NA | 65.7 ± 14.1*** | 54.2 ± 24.3*** | 1.8 ± 0.4 | 37.3 ± 2.4 |
Values are expressed as the mean ± SD. The serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), glutamyltransferase (GGT), glycylproline dipeptidyl aminopeptidase (GPDA), total bile acid (TBA), total bilirubin (TB) and albumin (ALB) were determined after 24 h of D-galactosamine (D-GalN) administration. Compared with the PC group, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 1Effects of pretreatment with five Bifidobacterium strains on hepatic histological abnormalities during D-galactosamine (D-GalN)-induced acute liver injury. Representative images of hepatic haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and histological scores of livers based on these images. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001 compared with the positive acute liver injury control (PC) group.
Figure 2Effects of pretreatment with B. pseudocatenulatum LI09 or B. catenulatum LI10 on hypercytokinemia during D-GalN-induced acute liver injury. Values are expressed as the median with interquartile range. *p < 0.05 compared with the PC group.
Effects of pretreatment with B. pseudocatenulatum LI09 or B. catenulatum LI10 on bacterial translocation during D-GalN-induced acute liver injury.
| MLN (log10 CFU/g) | |
|---|---|
| LI09 (n = 9) | 2.0 ± 1.4* |
| LI10 (n = 9) | 2.3 ± 1.2* |
| PC (n = 8) | 3.7 ± 0.5 |
| NC (n = 6) | 2.8 ± 0.3* |
Values are expressed as the mean ± SD. *p < 0.05 compared with the PC group.
Figure 3Effects of pretreatment with B. pseudocatenulatum LI09 or B. catenulatum LI10 on ileal histological abnormalities during D-GalN-induced acute liver injury. (a) Representative images of distal ileal H&E staining and histological scores of distal ileums based on these images. Values are expressed as the median with interquartile range. *p < 0.05 compared with the PC group. (b) Representative electron microscopy images of the distal ileum. Microvilli of the intestinal epithelial cells were examined.
Figure 4Effects of pretreatment with B. pseudocatenulatum LI09 or B. catenulatum LI10 on the overall structural changes of gut microbial communities during D-GalN-induced acute liver injury. (a) The alpha diversity of the gut microbiome, determined by Simpson index and Chao1 index, in the LI09 or LI10 group was compared with that in the PC group. Values are expressed as the median with interquartile range. (b) The principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) plot shows the beta diversity of the gut microbiome with unweighted UniFrac distance derived from 16S-based sequencing data. Composition profiles of the caecal flora in the LI09 or LI10 group was compared with those in the PC and negative acute liver injury control (NC) groups.
Figure 5Effects of pretreatment with B. pseudocatenulatum LI09 or B. catenulatum LI10 on the alterations of gut bacterial taxonomic abundance during D-GalN-induced acute liver injury. (a) Bacterial taxa identified as differentially abundant between two groups analysed by linear discriminant analysis effect size (LEfSe). The bacterial taxa of the NC, LI09 and LI10 groups were compared with those of the PC group at different levels. Green indicates those bacterial taxa whose abundance were higher in the PC group, and red indicates those bacterial taxa whose abundance were higher in the other group. In addition, yellow indicates those bacterial taxa whose abundance show non-significant differences between the two groups. (b) The relative abundance at the bacterial family level in the LI09 or LI10 group was compared with that in the PC group. (c) The relative abundance at the bacterial genus level in the LI09 or LI10 group was compared with that in the PC group. Values are expressed as the median with interquartile range. *p < 0.05 compared with the PC group.
Figure 6Correlation-network analysis of plasma cytokines and gut bacterial genera of D-GalN-sensitized rats who received B. pseudocatenulatum LI09 or B. catenulatum LI10. A Spearman correlation analysis was performed, and only correlations with p < 0.05 are displayed. Blue nodes represent bacterial genera, and yellow nodes represent cytokines. The ellipses indicate that the depletion of the bacterial genera was alleviated compared to that in the PC group, and the round rectangles indicate that the enrichment of the bacterial genera was alleviated or the increase of the cytokines was alleviated compared to that in the PC group. A red line connecting nodes represents positive correlation, and a green line represents negative correlation. Values of the corresponding correlation coefficients are indicated by the thickness of the line; the thicker the line, the greater the coefficient.