Literature DB >> 29873099

Augmented outcome-weighted learning for estimating optimal dynamic treatment regimens.

Ying Liu1, Yuanjia Wang2, Michael R Kosorok3, Yingqi Zhao4, Donglin Zeng3.   

Abstract

Dynamic treatment regimens (DTRs) are sequential treatment decisions tailored by patient's evolving features and intermediate outcomes at each treatment stage. Patient heterogeneity and the complexity and chronicity of many diseases call for learning optimal DTRs that can best tailor treatment according to each individual's time-varying characteristics (eg, intermediate response over time). In this paper, we propose a robust and efficient approach referred to as Augmented Outcome-weighted Learning (AOL) to identify optimal DTRs from sequential multiple assignment randomized trials. We improve previously proposed outcome-weighted learning to allow for negative weights. Furthermore, to reduce the variability of weights for numeric stability and improve estimation accuracy, in AOL, we propose a robust augmentation to the weights by making use of predicted pseudooutcomes from regression models for Q-functions. We show that AOL still yields Fisher-consistent DTRs even if the regression models are misspecified and that an appropriate choice of the augmentation guarantees smaller stochastic errors in value function estimation for AOL than the previous outcome-weighted learning. Finally, we establish the convergence rates for AOL. The comparative advantage of AOL over existing methods is demonstrated through extensive simulation studies and an application to a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial for major depressive disorder.
Copyright © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Q-learning; SMARTs; adaptive intervention; individualized treatment rule; machine learning; outcome-weighted learning; personalized medicine

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29873099      PMCID: PMC6191367          DOI: 10.1002/sim.7844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  15 in total

1.  Estimation of survival distributions of treatment policies in two-stage randomization designs in clinical trials.

Authors:  Jared K Lunceford; Marie Davidian; Anastasios A Tsiatis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  An experimental design for the development of adaptive treatment strategies.

Authors:  S A Murphy
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2005-05-30       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Marginal Mean Models for Dynamic Regimes.

Authors:  S A Murphy; M J van der Laan; J M Robins
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  Reinforcement learning design for cancer clinical trials.

Authors:  Yufan Zhao; Michael R Kosorok; Donglin Zeng
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-20       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  C-learning: A new classification framework to estimate optimal dynamic treatment regimes.

Authors:  Baqun Zhang; Min Zhang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Methodological challenges in constructing effective treatment sequences for chronic psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Susan A Murphy; David W Oslin; A John Rush; Ji Zhu
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2006-11-08       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  New Statistical Learning Methods for Estimating Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes.

Authors:  Ying-Qi Zhao; Donglin Zeng; Eric B Laber; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 5.033

8.  Sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D): rationale and design.

Authors:  A John Rush; Maurizio Fava; Stephen R Wisniewski; Philip W Lavori; Madhukar H Trivedi; Harold A Sackeim; Michael E Thase; Andrew A Nierenberg; Frederic M Quitkin; T Michael Kashner; David J Kupfer; Jerrold F Rosenbaum; Jonathan Alpert; Jonathan W Stewart; Patrick J McGrath; Melanie M Biggs; Kathy Shores-Wilson; Barry D Lebowitz; Louise Ritz; George Niederehe
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  2004-02

9.  Combining biomarkers to optimize patient treatment recommendations.

Authors:  Chaeryon Kang; Holly Janes; Ying Huang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Evaluation of Viable Dynamic Treatment Regimes in a Sequentially Randomized Trial of Advanced Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Lu Wang; Andrea Rotnitzky; Xihong Lin; Randall E Millikan; Peter F Thall
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.033

View more
  16 in total

1.  Matched Learning for Optimizing Individualized Treatment Strategies Using Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Peng Wu; Donglin Zeng; Yuanjia Wang
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  A constrained single-index regression for estimating interactions between a treatment and covariates.

Authors:  Hyung Park; Eva Petkova; Thaddeus Tarpey; R Todd Ogden
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Discussion of Kallus (2020) and Mo et al (2020).

Authors:  Muxuan Liang; Ying-Qi Zhao
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  A sparse additive model for treatment effect-modifier selection.

Authors:  Hyung Park; Eva Petkova; Thaddeus Tarpey; R Todd Ogden
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 5.279

5.  Learning Personalized Treatment Rules from Electronic Health Records Using Topic Modeling Feature Extraction.

Authors:  Peng Wu; Tianchen Xu; Yuanjia Wang
Journal:  Proc Int Conf Data Sci Adv Anal       Date:  2020-01-23

6.  Estimating the optimal individualized treatment rule from a cost-effectiveness perspective.

Authors:  Yizhe Xu; Tom H Greene; Adam P Bress; Brian C Sauer; Brandon K Bellows; Yue Zhang; William S Weintraub; Andrew E Moran; Jincheng Shen
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  A semiparametric instrumental variable approach to optimal treatment regimes under endogeneity.

Authors:  Yifan Cui; Eric Tchetgen Tchetgen
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 5.033

8.  Improved doubly robust estimation in learning optimal individualized treatment rules.

Authors:  Yinghao Pan; Ying-Qi Zhao
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 5.033

9.  Learning Optimal Distributionally Robust Individualized Treatment Rules.

Authors:  Weibin Mo; Zhengling Qi; Yufeng Liu
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 5.033

10.  Near-optimal Individualized Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Haomiao Meng; Ying-Qi Zhao; Haoda Fu; Xingye Qiao
Journal:  J Mach Learn Res       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 5.177

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.