Literature DB >> 24889663

Combining biomarkers to optimize patient treatment recommendations.

Chaeryon Kang1, Holly Janes1, Ying Huang1.   

Abstract

Markers that predict treatment effect have the potential to improve patient outcomes. For example, the OncotypeDX® RecurrenceScore® has some ability to predict the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy over and above hormone therapy for the treatment of estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer, facilitating the provision of chemotherapy to women most likely to benefit from it. Given that the score was originally developed for predicting outcome given hormone therapy alone, it is of interest to develop alternative combinations of the genes comprising the score that are optimized for treatment selection. However, most methodology for combining markers is useful when predicting outcome under a single treatment. We propose a method for combining markers for treatment selection which requires modeling the treatment effect as a function of markers. Multiple models of treatment effect are fit iteratively by upweighting or "boosting" subjects potentially misclassified according to treatment benefit at the previous stage. The boosting approach is compared to existing methods in a simulation study based on the change in expected outcome under marker-based treatment. The approach improves upon methods in some settings and has comparable performance in others. Our simulation study also provides insights as to the relative merits of the existing methods. Application of the boosting approach to the breast cancer data, using scaled versions of the original markers, produces marker combinations that may have improved performance for treatment selection.
© 2014, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarker; Boosting; Model mis‐specification; Treatment selection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24889663      PMCID: PMC4248022          DOI: 10.1111/biom.12191

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  23 in total

1.  Prognostic and Predictive Factors for Breast Cancer.

Authors: 
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  1995-10-31       Impact factor: 4.239

Review 2.  Uses and abuses of tumor markers in the diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment of primary and metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  N Lynn Henry; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2006-06

3.  Analysis of randomized comparative clinical trial data for personalized treatment selections.

Authors:  Tianxi Cai; Lu Tian; Peggy H Wong; L J Wei
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data.

Authors:  Jared C Foster; Jeremy M G Taylor; Stephen J Ruberg
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  AUC-based biomarker ensemble with an application on gene scores predicting low bone mineral density.

Authors:  X G Zhao; W Dai; Y Li; L Tian
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-09-09       Impact factor: 6.937

6.  Variable selection for optimal treatment decision.

Authors:  Wenbin Lu; Hao Helen Zhang; Donglin Zeng
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.021

7.  PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES FOR INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT RULES.

Authors:  Min Qian; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.028

8.  Variable Selection for Qualitative Interactions.

Authors:  L Gunter; J Zhu; S A Murphy
Journal:  Stat Methodol       Date:  2011-01-30

9.  Adjuvant chemotherapy and timing of tamoxifen in postmenopausal patients with endocrine-responsive, node-positive breast cancer: a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Kathy S Albain; William E Barlow; Peter M Ravdin; William B Farrar; Gary V Burton; Steven J Ketchel; Charles D Cobau; Ellis G Levine; James N Ingle; Kathleen I Pritchard; Allen S Lichter; Daniel J Schneider; Martin D Abeloff; I Craig Henderson; Hyman B Muss; Stephanie J Green; Danika Lew; Robert B Livingston; Silvana Martino; C Kent Osborne
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  An approach to evaluating and comparing biomarkers for patient treatment selection.

Authors:  Holly Janes; Marshall D Brown; Ying Huang; Margaret S Pepe
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 0.968

View more
  27 in total

1.  Doubly Robust Learning for Estimating Individualized Treatment with Censored Data.

Authors:  Y Q Zhao; D Zeng; E B Laber; R Song; M Yuan; M R Kosorok
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 2.445

2.  Matched Learning for Optimizing Individualized Treatment Strategies Using Electronic Health Records.

Authors:  Peng Wu; Donglin Zeng; Yuanjia Wang
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 5.033

3.  Robustifying Trial-Derived Optimal Treatment Rules for A Target Population.

Authors:  Ying-Qi Zhao; Donglin Zeng; Catherine M Tangen; Michael L LeBlanc
Journal:  Electron J Stat       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 1.125

4.  Identification of the optimal treatment regimen in the presence of missing covariates.

Authors:  Ying Huang; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Generated effect modifiers (GEM's) in randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Eva Petkova; Thaddeus Tarpey; Zhe Su; R Todd Ogden
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 5.899

6.  Comment.

Authors:  Qian Guan; Eric B Laber; Brian J Reich
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 5.033

7.  Greedy outcome weighted tree learning of optimal personalized treatment rules.

Authors:  Ruoqing Zhu; Ying-Qi Zhao; Guanhua Chen; Shuangge Ma; Hongyu Zhao
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Decision making and uncertainty quantification for individualized treatments using Bayesian Additive Regression Trees.

Authors:  Brent R Logan; Rodney Sparapani; Robert E McCulloch; Purushottam W Laud
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 3.021

9.  Bayesian predictive modeling for genomic based personalized treatment selection.

Authors:  Junsheng Ma; Francesco C Stingo; Brian P Hobbs
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  A modified classification tree method for personalized medicine decisions.

Authors:  Wan-Min Tsai; Heping Zhang; Eugenia Buta; Stephanie O'Malley; Ralitza Gueorguieva
Journal:  Stat Interface       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 0.582

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.