Literature DB >> 33041401

Matched Learning for Optimizing Individualized Treatment Strategies Using Electronic Health Records.

Peng Wu1, Donglin Zeng2, Yuanjia Wang3.   

Abstract

Current guidelines for treatment decision making largely rely on data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studying average treatment effects. They may be inadequate to make individualized treatment decisions in real-world settings. Large-scale electronic health records (EHR) provide opportunities to fulfill the goals of personalized medicine and learn individualized treatment rules (ITRs) depending on patient-specific characteristics from real-world patient data. In this work, we tackle challenges with EHRs and propose a machine learning approach based on matching (M-learning) to estimate optimal ITRs from EHRs. This new learning method performs matching instead of inverse probability weighting as commonly used in many existing methods for estimating ITRs to more accurately assess individuals' treatment responses to alternative treatments and alleviate confounding. Matching-based value functions are proposed to compare matched pairs under a unified framework, where various types of outcomes for measuring treatment response (including continuous, ordinal, and discrete outcomes) can easily be accommodated. We establish the Fisher consistency and convergence rate of M-learning. Through extensive simulation studies, we show that M-learning outperforms existing methods when propensity scores are misspecified or when unmeasured confounders are present in certain scenarios. Lastly, we apply M-learning to estimate optimal personalized second-line treatments for type 2 diabetes patients to achieve better glycemic control or reduce major complications using EHRs from New York Presbyterian Hospital.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Individualized treatment rules; Machine learning; Matching; Observational studies; Personalized medicine

Year:  2019        PMID: 33041401      PMCID: PMC7539620          DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2018.1549050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  21 in total

1.  Matching methods for causal inference: A review and a look forward.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.901

2.  A matching method for improving covariate balance in cost-effectiveness analyses.

Authors:  Jasjeet Singh Sekhon; Richard D Grieve
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  A new initiative on precision medicine.

Authors:  Francis S Collins; Harold Varmus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Estimating optimal treatment regimes via subgroup identification in randomized control trials and observational studies.

Authors:  Haoda Fu; Jin Zhou; Douglas E Faries
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES FOR INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT RULES.

Authors:  Min Qian; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.028

6.  Doubly robust matching estimators for high dimensional confounding adjustment.

Authors:  Joseph Antonelli; Matthew Cefalu; Nathan Palmer; Denis Agniel
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Combining biomarkers to optimize patient treatment recommendations.

Authors:  Chaeryon Kang; Holly Janes; Ying Huang
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Distinguishing Selection Bias and Confounding Bias in Comparative Effectiveness Research.

Authors:  Sebastien Haneuse
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 9.  The Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network: past, present, and future.

Authors:  Omri Gottesman; Helena Kuivaniemi; Gerard Tromp; W Andrew Faucett; Rongling Li; Teri A Manolio; Saskia C Sanderson; Joseph Kannry; Randi Zinberg; Melissa A Basford; Murray Brilliant; David J Carey; Rex L Chisholm; Christopher G Chute; John J Connolly; David Crosslin; Joshua C Denny; Carlos J Gallego; Jonathan L Haines; Hakon Hakonarson; John Harley; Gail P Jarvik; Isaac Kohane; Iftikhar J Kullo; Eric B Larson; Catherine McCarty; Marylyn D Ritchie; Dan M Roden; Maureen E Smith; Erwin P Böttinger; Marc S Williams
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-06-06       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Next-generation phenotyping of electronic health records.

Authors:  George Hripcsak; David J Albers
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  2 in total

1.  Self-matched learning to construct treatment decision rules from electronic health records.

Authors:  Tianchen Xu; Yuan Chen; Donglin Zeng; Yuanjia Wang
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 2.497

2.  Near-optimal Individualized Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Haomiao Meng; Ying-Qi Zhao; Haoda Fu; Xingye Qiao
Journal:  J Mach Learn Res       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 5.177

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.