Literature DB >> 15061154

Sequenced treatment alternatives to relieve depression (STAR*D): rationale and design.

A John Rush1, Maurizio Fava, Stephen R Wisniewski, Philip W Lavori, Madhukar H Trivedi, Harold A Sackeim, Michael E Thase, Andrew A Nierenberg, Frederic M Quitkin, T Michael Kashner, David J Kupfer, Jerrold F Rosenbaum, Jonathan Alpert, Jonathan W Stewart, Patrick J McGrath, Melanie M Biggs, Kathy Shores-Wilson, Barry D Lebowitz, Louise Ritz, George Niederehe.   

Abstract

STAR*D is a multisite, prospective, randomized, multistep clinical trial of outpatients with nonpsychotic major depressive disorder. The study compares various treatment options for those who do not attain a satisfactory response with citalopram, a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant. The study enrolls 4000 adults (ages 18-75) from both primary and specialty care practices who have not had either a prior inadequate response or clear-cut intolerance to a robust trial of protocol treatments during the current major depressive episode. After receiving citalopram (level 1), participants without sufficient symptomatic benefit are eligible for randomization to level 2 treatments, which entail four switch options (sertraline, bupropion, venlafaxine, cognitive therapy) and three citalopram augment options (bupropion, buspirone, cognitive therapy). Those who receive cognitive therapy (switch or augment options) at level 2 without sufficient improvement are eligible for randomization to one of two level 2A switch options (venlafaxine or bupropion). Level 2 and 2A participants are eligible for random assignment to two switch options (mirtazapine or nortriptyline) and to two augment options (lithium or thyroid hormone) added to the primary antidepressant (citalopram, bupropion, sertraline, or venlafaxine) (level 3). Those without sufficient improvement at level 3 are eligible for level 4 random assignment to one of two switch options (tranylcypromine or the combination of mirtazapine and venlafaxine). The primary outcome is the clinician-rated, 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, administered at entry and exit from each treatment level through telephone interviews by assessors masked to treatment assignments. Secondary outcomes include self-reported depressive symptoms, physical and mental function, side-effect burden, client satisfaction, and health care utilization and cost. Participants with an adequate symptomatic response may enter the 12-month naturalistic follow-up phase with brief monthly and more complete quarterly assessments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15061154     DOI: 10.1016/s0197-2456(03)00112-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Control Clin Trials        ISSN: 0197-2456


  286 in total

1.  What are the clinical implications of new onset or worsening anxiety during the first two weeks of SSRI treatment for depression?

Authors:  Jackie K Gollan; Maurizio Fava; Benji Kurian; Stephen R Wisniewski; A John Rush; Ella Daly; Sachiko Miyahara; Madhukar H Trivedi
Journal:  Depress Anxiety       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 6.505

2.  The treatment of minor depression with St. John's Wort or citalopram: failure to show benefit over placebo.

Authors:  Mark Hyman Rapaport; Andrew A Nierenberg; Robert Howland; Christina Dording; Pamela J Schettler; David Mischoulon
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 4.791

3.  Assessing anxious features in depressed outpatients.

Authors:  Shawn M McClintock; Mustafa M Husain; Ira H Bernstein; Stephen R Wisniewski; Madhukar H Trivedi; David Morris; Jonathan Alpert; Diane Warden; James F Luther; Susan G Kornstein; Melanie M Biggs; Maurizio Fava; A John Rush
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 4.035

4.  Antidepressant response in patients with major depression exposed to NSAIDs: a pharmacovigilance study.

Authors:  Patience J Gallagher; Victor Castro; Maurizio Fava; Jeffrey B Weilburg; Shawn N Murphy; Vivian S Gainer; Susanne E Churchill; Isaac S Kohane; Dan V Iosifescu; Jordan W Smoller; Roy H Perlis
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 18.112

5.  Another look at outcomes and outcome measures in psychiatry: cui bono?

Authors:  Cynthia L Arfken; Richard Balon
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 17.659

6.  A clinical risk stratification tool for predicting treatment resistance in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Roy H Perlis
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 13.382

7.  Translating Science Into Service: Lessons Learned From the Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) Study.

Authors:  Norman Sussman
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2007

8.  FKBP5 genetic variation: association with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor treatment outcomes in major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Katarzyna A Ellsworth; Irene Moon; Bruce W Eckloff; Brooke L Fridley; Gregory D Jenkins; Anthony Batzler; Joanna M Biernacka; Ryan Abo; Abra Brisbin; Yuan Ji; Scott Hebbring; Eric D Wieben; David A Mrazek; Richard M Weinshilboum; Liewei Wang
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.089

9.  Resequencing of serotonin-related genes and association of tagging SNPs to citalopram response.

Authors:  Eric J Peters; Susan L Slager; Greg D Jenkins; Megan S Reinalda; Holly A Garriock; Stanley I Shyn; Jeffrey B Kraft; Patrick J McGrath; Steven P Hamilton
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Rare copy number variation in treatment-resistant major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Colm O'Dushlaine; Stephan Ripke; Douglas M Ruderfer; Steven P Hamilton; Maurizio Fava; Dan V Iosifescu; Isaac S Kohane; Susanne E Churchill; Victor M Castro; Caitlin C Clements; Sarah R Blumenthal; Shawn N Murphy; Jordan W Smoller; Roy H Perlis
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-01-19       Impact factor: 13.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.