Literature DB >> 32090211

Learning Personalized Treatment Rules from Electronic Health Records Using Topic Modeling Feature Extraction.

Peng Wu1, Tianchen Xu1, Yuanjia Wang1.   

Abstract

To address substantial heterogeneity in patient response to treatment of chronic disorders and achieve the promise of precision medicine, individualized treatment rules (ITRs) are estimated to tailor treatments according to patient-specific characteristics. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) provide gold standard data for learning ITRs not subject to confounding bias. However, RCTs are often conducted under stringent inclusion/exclusion criteria, and participants in RCTs may not reflect the general patient population. Thus, ITRs learned from RCTs lack generalizability to the broader real world patient population. Real world databases such as electronic health records (EHRs) provide new resources as complements to RCTs to facilitate evidence-based research for personalized medicine. However, to ensure the validity of ITRs learned from EHRs, a number of challenges including confounding bias and selection bias must be addressed. In this work, we propose a matching-based machine learning method to estimate optimal individualized treatment rules from EHRs using interpretable features extracted from EHR documentation of medications and ICD diagnoses codes. We use a latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) model to extract latent topics and weights as features for learning ITRs. Our method achieves confounding reduction in observational studies through matching treated and untreated individuals and improves treatment optimization by augmenting feature space with clinically meaningful LDA-based features. We apply the method to EHR data collected at New York Presbyterian Hospital clinical data warehouse in studying optimal second-line treatment for type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients. We use cross validation to show that ITRs outperforms uniform treatment strategies (i.e., assigning same treatment to all individuals), and including topic modeling features leads to more reduction of post-treatment complications.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32090211      PMCID: PMC7035126          DOI: 10.1109/dsaa.2019.00054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Int Conf Data Sci Adv Anal


  22 in total

1.  Outcome-Weighted Learning for Personalized Medicine with Multiple Treatment Options.

Authors:  Xuan Zhou; Yuanjia Wang; Donglin Zeng
Journal:  Proc Int Conf Data Sci Adv Anal       Date:  2019-02-04

2.  A distribution-based method for assessing the differences between clinical trial target populations and patient populations in electronic health records.

Authors:  C Weng; Y Li; P Ryan; Y Zhang; F Liu; J Gao; J T Bigger; G Hripcsak
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Identifying and mitigating biases in EHR laboratory tests.

Authors:  Rimma Pivovarov; David J Albers; Jorge L Sepulveda; Noémie Elhadad
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 6.317

4.  PERFORMANCE GUARANTEES FOR INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT RULES.

Authors:  Min Qian; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.028

5.  Generalizing evidence from randomized clinical trials to target populations: The ACTG 320 trial.

Authors:  Stephen R Cole; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Depression is not a consistent syndrome: An investigation of unique symptom patterns in the STAR*D study.

Authors:  Eiko I Fried; Randolph M Nesse
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 4.839

7.  Tree-based methods for individualized treatment regimes.

Authors:  E B Laber; Y Q Zhao
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 2.445

Review 8.  Comparative effectiveness and safety of medications for type 2 diabetes: an update including new drugs and 2-drug combinations.

Authors:  Wendy L Bennett; Nisa M Maruthur; Sonal Singh; Jodi B Segal; Lisa M Wilson; Ranee Chatterjee; Spyridon S Marinopoulos; Milo A Puhan; Padmini Ranasinghe; Lauren Block; Wanda K Nicholson; Susan Hutfless; Eric B Bass; Shari Bolen
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-03-14       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Doubly robust matching estimators for high dimensional confounding adjustment.

Authors:  Joseph Antonelli; Matthew Cefalu; Nathan Palmer; Denis Agniel
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Improving propensity score weighting using machine learning.

Authors:  Brian K Lee; Justin Lessler; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 2.373

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.