Literature DB >> 11890326

Estimation of survival distributions of treatment policies in two-stage randomization designs in clinical trials.

Jared K Lunceford1, Marie Davidian, Anastasios A Tsiatis.   

Abstract

Some clinical trials follow a design where patients are randomized to a primary therapy at entry followed by another randomization to maintenance therapy contingent upon disease remission. Ideally, analysis would allow different treatment policies, i.e., combinations of primary and maintenance therapy if specified up-front, to be compared. Standard practice is to conduct separate analyses for the primary and follow-up treatments, which does not address this issue directly. We propose consistent estimators for the survival distribution and mean restricted survival time for each treatment policy in such two-stage studies and derive large-sample properties. The methods are demonstrated on a leukemia clinical trial data set and through simulation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11890326     DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2002.00048.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  49 in total

1.  Sample size formulae for two-stage randomized trials with survival outcomes.

Authors:  Zhiguo Li; Susan A Murphy
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2011-07-13       Impact factor: 2.445

2.  Expression of p21 protein predicts clinical outcome in DLBCL patients older than 60 years treated with R-CHOP but not CHOP: a prospective ECOG and Southwest Oncology Group correlative study on E4494.

Authors:  Jane N Winter; Shuli Li; Vikas Aurora; Daina Variakojis; Beverly Nelson; Maryla Krajewska; Lijun Zhang; Thomas M Habermann; Richard I Fisher; William R Macon; Mukesh Chhanabhai; Raymond E Felgar; Eric D Hsi; L Jeffrey Medeiros; James K Weick; Edie A Weller; Ari Melnick; John C Reed; Sandra J Horning; Randy D Gascoyne
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-04-06       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Design Issues in Randomized Clinical Trials of Maintenance Therapies.

Authors:  Boris Freidlin; Richard F Little; Edward L Korn
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Prognostic significance of Bcl-6 protein expression in DLBCL treated with CHOP or R-CHOP: a prospective correlative study.

Authors:  Jane N Winter; Edie A Weller; Sandra J Horning; Maryla Krajewska; Daina Variakojis; Thomas M Habermann; Richard I Fisher; Paul J Kurtin; William R Macon; Mukesh Chhanabhai; Raymond E Felgar; Eric D Hsi; L Jeffrey Medeiros; James K Weick; John C Reed; Randy D Gascoyne
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2006-01-31       Impact factor: 22.113

5.  Optimizing delivery of a behavioral pain intervention in cancer patients using a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial SMART.

Authors:  Sarah A Kelleher; Caroline S Dorfman; Jen C Plumb Vilardaga; Catherine Majestic; Joseph Winger; Vicky Gandhi; Christine Nunez; Alyssa Van Denburg; Rebecca A Shelby; Shelby D Reed; Susan Murphy; Marie Davidian; Eric B Laber; Gretchen G Kimmick; Kelly W Westbrook; Amy P Abernethy; Tamara J Somers
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 2.226

6.  Innovative Clinical Trial Designs: Toward a 21st-Century Health Care System.

Authors:  Tze L Lai; Philip W Lavori
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2011-12

7.  Estimating treatment effects with treatment switching via semicompeting risks models: an application to a colorectal cancer study.

Authors:  Donglin Zeng; Qingxia Chen; Ming-Hui Chen; Joseph G Ibrahim
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  2011-12-29       Impact factor: 2.445

8.  Evaluating the Effect of Early Versus Late ARV Regimen Change if Failure on an Initial Regimen: Results From the AIDS Clinical Trials Group Study A5095.

Authors:  Li Li; Joseph J Eron; Heather Ribaudo; Roy M Gulick; Brent A Johnson
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 9.  Inference for non-regular parameters in optimal dynamic treatment regimes.

Authors:  Bibhas Chakraborty; Susan Murphy; Victor Strecher
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 3.021

10.  Penalized Q-Learning for Dynamic Treatment Regimens.

Authors:  R Song; W Wang; D Zeng; M R Kosorok
Journal:  Stat Sin       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.261

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.