| Literature DB >> 29850370 |
Federica Bianchi1, Nicolò Riboni1,2, Veronica Termopoli3, Lucia Mendez4, Isabel Medina4, Leopold Ilag2, Achille Cappiello3, Maria Careri1.
Abstract
Mass spectrometry is the most powerful technique for the detection and identification of organic compounds. It can provide molecular weight information and a wealth of structural details that give a unique fingerprint for each analyte. Due to these characteristics, mass spectrometry-based analytical methods are showing an increasing interest in the scientific community, especially in food safety, environmental, and forensic investigation areas where the simultaneous detection of targeted and nontargeted compounds represents a key factor. In addition, safety risks can be identified at the early stage through online and real-time analytical methodologies. In this context, several efforts have been made to achieve analytical instrumentation able to perform real-time analysis in the native environment of samples and to generate highly informative spectra. This review article provides a survey of some instrumental innovations and their applications with particular attention to spray-based MS methods and food analysis issues. The survey will attempt to cover the state of the art from 2012 up to 2017.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29850370 PMCID: PMC5937452 DOI: 10.1155/2018/1308167
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anal Methods Chem ISSN: 2090-8873 Impact factor: 2.193
Figure 1Global layout of the fully assembled system; the LEI interface, in gray, is between the UHPLC system and the MS detector. In the red circle, the vaporization zone is highlighted. Reprinted with permission from [33].
Figure 2EI-LC-MS with the SMB system outline. The liquid is introduced either from the HPLC system after its column or from a syringe pump to the heated vaporization chamber through a pneumatic nebulizer. The helium nebulization gas enters the SMB interface through a nebulization gas line, sheath gas line, and nozzle make-up gas line. Reprinted with permission from [35].
Figure 3Schematic representation of the developed experimental setup. Reprinted with permission from [65].
Figure 4Schematic representation of the SFME-nano-ESI sample processing. Reprinted with permission from [69].
Figure 5Picture and schematic representation of the pneumatically assisted nano-DESI ionization source. Reprinted with permission from [78].
Figure 6Schematic representation of tg-LAESI-MS. Reprinted with permission from [86].
Figure 7Schematic representation of the procedure proposed by Montowska et al. Reprinted with permission from [106].
Figure 8Schematic representation of the instrumental setup proposed by Huang. Reprinted with permission from [127].