Literature DB >> 29794240

Repeated Selection of Alternatively Adapted Haplotypes Creates Sweeping Genomic Remodeling in Stickleback.

Susan Bassham1, Julian Catchen2, Emily Lescak3,4, Frank A von Hippel5,6, William A Cresko1.   

Abstract

Heterogeneous genetic divergence can accumulate across the genome when populations adapt to different habitats while still exchanging alleles. How long does diversification take and how much of the genome is affected? When divergence occurs in parallel from standing genetic variation, how often are the same haplotypes involved? We explore these questions using restriction site-associated DNA sequencing genotyping data and show that broad-scale genomic repatterning, fueled by copious standing variation, can emerge in just dozens of generations in replicate natural populations of threespine stickleback fish (Gasterosteus aculeatus). After the catastrophic 1964 Alaskan earthquake, marine stickleback colonized newly created ponds on seismically uplifted islands. We find that freshwater fish in these young ponds differ from their marine ancestors across the same genomic segments previously shown to have diverged in much older lake populations. Outside of these core divergent regions the genome shows no population structure across the ocean-freshwater divide, consistent with strong local selection acting in alternative environments on stickleback populations still connected by significant gene flow. Reinforcing this inference, a majority of divergent haplotypes that are at high frequency in ponds are detectable in the sea, even across great geographic distances. Building upon previous population genomics work in this model species, our data suggest that a long history of divergent selection and gene flow among stickleback populations in oceanic and freshwater habitats has maintained polymorphisms of alternatively adapted DNA sequences that facilitate parallel evolution.
Copyright © 2018 by the Genetics Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gasterosteus aculeatus; contemporary evolution; ecological divergence; population genomics; threespine stickleback

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29794240      PMCID: PMC6028257          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.117.300610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  90 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Evolution of stickleback in 50 years on earthquake-uplifted islands.

Authors:  Emily A Lescak; Susan L Bassham; Julian Catchen; Ofer Gelmond; Mary L Sherbick; Frank A von Hippel; William A Cresko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Independent axes of genetic variation and parallel evolutionary divergence of opercle bone shape in threespine stickleback.

Authors:  Charles B Kimmel; William A Cresko; Patrick C Phillips; Bonnie Ullmann; Mark Currey; Frank von Hippel; Bjarni K Kristjánsson; Ofer Gelmond; Katrina McGuigan
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 4.  Ecological genomics of local adaptation.

Authors:  Outi Savolainen; Martin Lascoux; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 5.  Reanalysis suggests that genomic islands of speciation are due to reduced diversity, not reduced gene flow.

Authors:  Tami E Cruickshank; Matthew W Hahn
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Genome-wide analysis of a long-term evolution experiment with Drosophila.

Authors:  Molly K Burke; Joseph P Dunham; Parvin Shahrestani; Kevin R Thornton; Michael R Rose; Anthony D Long
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Genome-wide patterns of standing genetic variation in a marine population of three-spined sticklebacks.

Authors:  Philine G D Feulner; Frédéric J J Chain; Mahesh Panchal; Christophe Eizaguirre; Martin Kalbe; Tobias L Lenz; Marvin Mundry; Irene E Samonte; Monika Stoll; Manfred Milinski; Thorsten B H Reusch; Erich Bornberg-Bauer
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 6.185

8.  Population genomic evidence for adaptive differentiation in Baltic Sea three-spined sticklebacks.

Authors:  Baocheng Guo; Jacquelin DeFaveri; Graciela Sotelo; Abhilash Nair; Juha Merilä
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 7.431

9.  Linked selection and recombination rate variation drive the evolution of the genomic landscape of differentiation across the speciation continuum of Ficedula flycatchers.

Authors:  Reto Burri; Alexander Nater; Takeshi Kawakami; Carina F Mugal; Pall I Olason; Linnea Smeds; Alexander Suh; Ludovic Dutoit; Stanislav Bureš; Laszlo Z Garamszegi; Silje Hogner; Juan Moreno; Anna Qvarnström; Milan Ružić; Stein-Are Sæther; Glenn-Peter Sætre; Janos Török; Hans Ellegren
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  The genetics of human adaptation: hard sweeps, soft sweeps, and polygenic adaptation.

Authors:  Jonathan K Pritchard; Joseph K Pickrell; Graham Coop
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  23 in total

1.  Selection, Linkage, and Population Structure Interact To Shape Genetic Variation Among Threespine Stickleback Genomes.

Authors:  Thomas C Nelson; Johnathan G Crandall; Catherine M Ituarte; Julian M Catchen; William A Cresko
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Role of sexual imprinting in assortative mating and premating isolation in Darwin's finches.

Authors:  Peter R Grant; B Rosemary Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Population Genomics Analysis with RAD, Reprised: Stacks 2.

Authors:  Angel G Rivera-Colón; Julian Catchen
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

4.  A Single Interacting Species Leads to Widespread Parallel Evolution of the Stickleback Genome.

Authors:  Sara E Miller; Marius Roesti; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Phosphorus limitation does not drive loss of bony lateral plates in freshwater stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus).

Authors:  Sophie L Archambeault; Daniel J Durston; Alex Wan; Rana W El-Sabaawi; Blake Matthews; Catherine L Peichel
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 6.  Threespine Stickleback: A Model System For Evolutionary Genomics.

Authors:  Kerry Reid; Michael A Bell; Krishna R Veeramah
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 9.340

7.  Widespread selection and gene flow shape the genomic landscape during a radiation of monkeyflowers.

Authors:  Sean Stankowski; Madeline A Chase; Allison M Fuiten; Murillo F Rodrigues; Peter L Ralph; Matthew A Streisfeld
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Limited Evidence for Parallel Evolution Among Desert-Adapted Peromyscus Deer Mice.

Authors:  Jocelyn P Colella; Anna Tigano; Olga Dudchenko; Arina D Omer; Ruqayya Khan; Ivan D Bochkov; Erez L Aiden; Matthew D MacManes
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 2.645

9.  Extensive standing genetic variation from a small number of founders enables rapid adaptation in Daphnia.

Authors:  Anurag Chaturvedi; Jiarui Zhou; Joost A M Raeymaekers; Till Czypionka; Luisa Orsini; Craig E Jackson; Katina I Spanier; Joseph R Shaw; John K Colbourne; Luc De Meester
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Predicting future from past: The genomic basis of recurrent and rapid stickleback evolution.

Authors:  Garrett A Roberts Kingman; Deven N Vyas; Felicity C Jones; Shannon D Brady; Heidi I Chen; Kerry Reid; Mark Milhaven; Thomas S Bertino; Windsor E Aguirre; David C Heins; Frank A von Hippel; Peter J Park; Melanie Kirch; Devin M Absher; Richard M Myers; Federica Di Palma; Michael A Bell; David M Kingsley; Krishna R Veeramah
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-06-18       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.