Literature DB >> 30348758

Role of sexual imprinting in assortative mating and premating isolation in Darwin's finches.

Peter R Grant1, B Rosemary Grant2.   

Abstract

Global biodiversity is being degraded at an unprecedented rate, so it is important to preserve the potential for future speciation. Providing for the future requires understanding speciation as a contemporary ecological process. Phylogenetically young adaptive radiations are a good choice for detailed study because diversification is ongoing. A key question is how incipient species become reproductively isolated from each other. Barriers to gene exchange have been investigated experimentally in the laboratory and in the field, but little information exists from the quantitative study of mating patterns in nature. Although the degree to which genetic variation underlying mate-preference learning is unknown, we provide evidence that two species of Darwin's finches imprint on morphological cues of their parents and mate assortatively. Statistical evidence of presumed imprinting is stronger for sons than for daughters and is stronger for imprinting on fathers than on mothers. In combination, morphology and species-specific song learned from the father constitute a barrier to interbreeding. The barrier becomes stronger the more the species diverge morphologically and ecologically. It occasionally breaks down, and the species hybridize. Hybridization is most likely to happen when species are similar to each other in adaptive morphological traits, e.g., body size and beak size and shape. Hybridization can lead to the formation of a new species reproductively isolated from the parental species as a result of sexual imprinting. Conservation of sufficiently diverse natural habitat is needed to sustain a large sample of extant biota and preserve the potential for future speciation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assortative mating; hybridization; imprinting; speciation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30348758      PMCID: PMC6243256          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1813662115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  62 in total

Review 1.  The impact of learning on sexual selection and speciation.

Authors:  Machteld N Verzijden; Carel ten Cate; Maria R Servedio; Genevieve M Kozak; Jenny W Boughman; Erik I Svensson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.

Authors:  Genevieve M Kozak; Melissa Reisland; Janette W Boughmann
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  The (mis)concept of species recognition.

Authors:  Tamra C Mendelson; Kerry L Shaw
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Differential introgression in a mosaic hybrid zone reveals candidate barrier genes.

Authors:  Erica L Larson; Jose A Andrés; Steven M Bogdanowicz; Richard G Harrison
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Songs of Darwin's finches diverge when a new species enters the community.

Authors:  B Rosemary Grant; Peter R Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Sexual imprinting on ecologically divergent traits leads to sexual isolation in sticklebacks.

Authors:  Genevieve M Kozak; Megan L Head; Janette W Boughman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-01-26       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  The causes of variation in the presence of genetic covariance between sexual traits and preferences.

Authors:  Kasey D Fowler-Finn; Rafael L Rodríguez
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2015-03-25

8.  Evolution of Darwin's finches and their beaks revealed by genome sequencing.

Authors:  Sangeet Lamichhaney; Jonas Berglund; Markus Sällman Almén; Khurram Maqbool; Manfred Grabherr; Alvaro Martinez-Barrio; Marta Promerová; Carl-Johan Rubin; Chao Wang; Neda Zamani; B Rosemary Grant; Peter R Grant; Matthew T Webster; Leif Andersson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Genetic Coupling of Female Mate Choice with Polygenic Ecological Divergence Facilitates Stickleback Speciation.

Authors:  Rachael A Bay; Matthew E Arnegard; Gina L Conte; Jacob Best; Nicole L Bedford; Shaugnessy R McCann; Matthew E Dubin; Yingguang Frank Chan; Felicity C Jones; David M Kingsley; Dolph Schluter; Catherine L Peichel
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Repeated divergent selection on pigmentation genes in a rapid finch radiation.

Authors:  Leonardo Campagna; Márcio Repenning; Luís Fábio Silveira; Carla Suertegaray Fontana; Pablo L Tubaro; Irby J Lovette
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 14.136

View more
  11 in total

1.  Adult sex ratio influences mate choice in Darwin's finches.

Authors:  Peter R Grant; B Rosemary Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Female-biased gene flow between two species of Darwin's finches.

Authors:  Sangeet Lamichhaney; Fan Han; Matthew T Webster; B Rosemary Grant; Peter R Grant; Leif Andersson
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 15.460

3.  Larval environmental conditions influence plasticity in resource use by adults in the burying beetle, Nicrophorus vespilloides.

Authors:  Matthew Schrader; Benjamin J M Jarrett; Rebecca M Kilner
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 4.171

4.  Hybridization increases population variation during adaptive radiation.

Authors:  Peter R Grant; B Rosemary Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Triad hybridization via a conduit species.

Authors:  Peter R Grant; B Rosemary Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-25       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Character displacement drives trait divergence in a continental fauna.

Authors:  Sean A S Anderson; Jason T Weir
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  How phenotypic matching based on neutral mating cues enables speciation in locally adapted populations.

Authors:  Richard M Sibly; Mark Pagel; Robert N Curnow; Jonathan Edwards
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-11-17       Impact factor: 2.912

8.  Pattern blending enriches the diversity of animal colorations.

Authors:  Seita Miyazawa
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Machine learning reveals cryptic dialects that explain mate choice in a songbird.

Authors:  Daiping Wang; Wolfgang Forstmeier; Damien R Farine; Adriana A Maldonado-Chaparro; Katrin Martin; Yifan Pei; Gustavo Alarcón-Nieto; James A Klarevas-Irby; Shouwen Ma; Lucy M Aplin; Bart Kempenaers
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Morphological ghosts of introgression in Darwin's finch populations.

Authors:  Peter R Grant; B Rosemary Grant
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.