Literature DB >> 30686736

A Single Interacting Species Leads to Widespread Parallel Evolution of the Stickleback Genome.

Sara E Miller1, Marius Roesti2, Dolph Schluter2.   

Abstract

Biotic interactions are potent, widespread causes of natural selection and divergent phenotypic evolution and can lead to genetic differentiation with gene flow among wild populations ("isolation by ecology") [1-4]. Biotic selection has been predicted to act on more genes than abiotic selection thereby driving greater adaptation [5]. However, difficulties in isolating the genome-wide effect of single biotic agents of selection have limited our ability to identify and quantify the number and type of genetic regions responding to biotic selection [6-9]. We identified geographically interspersed lakes in which threespine stickleback fish (Gasterosteus aculeatus) have repeatedly adapted to the presence or absence of a single member of the ecological community, prickly sculpin (Cottus asper), a fish that is both a competitor and a predator of the stickleback [10]. Whole-genome sequencing revealed that sculpin presence or absence accounted for the majority of genetic divergence among stickleback populations, more so than geography. The major axis of genomic variation within and between the two lake types was correlated with multiple traits, indicating parallel natural selection across a gradient of biotic environments. A large proportion of the genome-about 1.8%, encompassing more than 600 genes-differentiated stickleback from the two biotic environments. Divergence occurred in 141 discrete genomic clumps located mainly in regions of low recombination, suggesting that genes brought to lakes by the colonizing ancestral population often evolved together in linked blocks. Strong selection and a wealth of standing genetic variation explain how a single member of the biotic community can have such a rapid and profound evolutionary impact.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biotic selection; genomic differentiation; intraguild predation; parallel evolution; sculpin; stickleback

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30686736      PMCID: PMC6371808          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.12.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  44 in total

1.  Directional selection is the primary cause of phenotypic diversification.

Authors:  Loren H Rieseberg; Alex Widmer; A Michele Arntz; John M Burke
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-09-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Ecological genomics of local adaptation.

Authors:  Outi Savolainen; Martin Lascoux; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 3.  Genetics and ecological speciation.

Authors:  Dolph Schluter; Gina L Conte
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Repeated Selection of Alternatively Adapted Haplotypes Creates Sweeping Genomic Remodeling in Stickleback.

Authors:  Susan Bassham; Julian Catchen; Emily Lescak; Frank A von Hippel; William A Cresko
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The genomic signature of parallel adaptation from shared genetic variation.

Authors:  Marius Roesti; Sergey Gavrilets; Andrew P Hendry; Walter Salzburger; Daniel Berner
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2014-04-05       Impact factor: 6.185

6.  Evolution of Darwin's finches and their beaks revealed by genome sequencing.

Authors:  Sangeet Lamichhaney; Jonas Berglund; Markus Sällman Almén; Khurram Maqbool; Manfred Grabherr; Alvaro Martinez-Barrio; Marta Promerová; Carl-Johan Rubin; Chao Wang; Neda Zamani; B Rosemary Grant; Peter R Grant; Matthew T Webster; Leif Andersson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-02-11       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Recurrent origin of a sexually selected trait in Xiphophorus fishes inferred from a molecular phylogeny.

Authors:  A Meyer; J M Morrissey; M Schartl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-04-07       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Population genomics of parallel adaptation in threespine stickleback using sequenced RAD tags.

Authors:  Paul A Hohenlohe; Susan Bassham; Paul D Etter; Nicholas Stiffler; Eric A Johnson; William A Cresko
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Genetic signature of adaptive peak shift in threespine stickleback.

Authors:  Sean M Rogers; Patrick Tamkee; Brian Summers; Sarita Balabahadra; Melissa Marks; David M Kingsley; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 6.937

View more
  12 in total

1.  Microbiome composition shapes rapid genomic adaptation of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Seth M Rudman; Sharon Greenblum; Rachel C Hughes; Subhash Rajpurohit; Ozan Kiratli; Dallin B Lowder; Skyler G Lemmon; Dmitri A Petrov; John M Chaston; Paul Schmidt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Effects of predation risk on egg steroid profiles across multiple populations of threespine stickleback.

Authors:  Katie E McGhee; Ryan T Paitz; John A Baker; Susan A Foster; Alison M Bell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Inference of natural selection from ancient DNA.

Authors:  Marianne Dehasque; María C Ávila-Arcos; David Díez-Del-Molino; Matteo Fumagalli; Katerina Guschanski; Eline D Lorenzen; Anna-Sapfo Malaspinas; Tomas Marques-Bonet; Michael D Martin; Gemma G R Murray; Alexander S T Papadopulos; Nina Overgaard Therkildsen; Daniel Wegmann; Love Dalén; Andrew D Foote
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2020-03-18

4.  Combining Experimental Evolution and Genomics to Understand How Seed Beetles Adapt to a Marginal Host Plant.

Authors:  Alexandre Rêgo; Samridhi Chaturvedi; Amy Springer; Alexandra M Lish; Caroline L Barton; Karen M Kapheim; Frank J Messina; Zachariah Gompert
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  Parallel selection on ecologically relevant gene functions in the transcriptomes of highly diversifying salmonids.

Authors:  Kevin Schneider; Colin E Adams; Kathryn R Elmer
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.969

Review 6.  Does phenotypic plasticity initiate developmental bias?

Authors:  Kevin J Parsons; Kirsty McWhinnie; Natalie Pilakouta; Lynsey Walker
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  Analysis of ancestry heterozygosity suggests that hybrid incompatibilities in threespine stickleback are environment dependent.

Authors:  Ken A Thompson; Catherine L Peichel; Diana J Rennison; Matthew D McGee; Arianne Y K Albert; Timothy H Vines; Anna K Greenwood; Abigail R Wark; Yaniv Brandvain; Molly Schumer; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Adaptive divergence and the evolution of hybrid trait mismatch in threespine stickleback.

Authors:  Avneet K Chhina; Ken A Thompson; Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Evol Lett       Date:  2022-01-04

9.  Three problems in the genetics of speciation by selection.

Authors:  Dolph Schluter; Loren H Rieseberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 12.779

10.  Whole-genome sequencing illuminates multifaceted targets of selection to humic substances in Eurasian perch.

Authors:  Mikhail Ozerov; Kristina Noreikiene; Siim Kahar; Magnus Huss; Ari Huusko; Toomas Kõiv; Margot Sepp; María-Eugenia López; Anna Gårdmark; Riho Gross; Anti Vasemägi
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 6.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.