Literature DB >> 20844486

Genome-wide analysis of a long-term evolution experiment with Drosophila.

Molly K Burke1, Joseph P Dunham, Parvin Shahrestani, Kevin R Thornton, Michael R Rose, Anthony D Long.   

Abstract

Experimental evolution systems allow the genomic study of adaptation, and so far this has been done primarily in asexual systems with small genomes, such as bacteria and yeast. Here we present whole-genome resequencing data from Drosophila melanogaster populations that have experienced over 600 generations of laboratory selection for accelerated development. Flies in these selected populations develop from egg to adult ∼20% faster than flies of ancestral control populations, and have evolved a number of other correlated phenotypes. On the basis of 688,520 intermediate-frequency, high-quality single nucleotide polymorphisms, we identify several dozen genomic regions that show strong allele frequency differentiation between a pooled sample of five replicate populations selected for accelerated development and pooled controls. On the basis of resequencing data from a single replicate population with accelerated development, as well as single nucleotide polymorphism data from individual flies from each replicate population, we infer little allele frequency differentiation between replicate populations within a selection treatment. Signatures of selection are qualitatively different than what has been observed in asexual species; in our sexual populations, adaptation is not associated with 'classic' sweeps whereby newly arising, unconditionally advantageous mutations become fixed. More parsimonious explanations include 'incomplete' sweep models, in which mutations have not had enough time to fix, and 'soft' sweep models, in which selection acts on pre-existing, common genetic variants. We conclude that, at least for life history characters such as development time, unconditionally advantageous alleles rarely arise, are associated with small net fitness gains or cannot fix because selection coefficients change over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20844486     DOI: 10.1038/nature09352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


  18 in total

1.  Soft sweeps: molecular population genetics of adaptation from standing genetic variation.

Authors:  Joachim Hermisson; Pleuni S Pennings
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  The signature of positive selection on standing genetic variation.

Authors:  Molly Przeworski; Graham Coop; Jeffrey D Wall
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 3.  The locus of evolution: evo devo and the genetics of adaptation.

Authors:  Hopi E Hoekstra; Jerry A Coyne
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Experimental evolution reveals natural selection on standing genetic variation.

Authors:  Henrique Teotónio; Ivo M Chelo; Martina Bradić; Michael R Rose; Anthony D Long
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2009-01-11       Impact factor: 38.330

5.  Analysis of genetic systems using experimental evolution and whole-genome sequencing.

Authors:  Matthew Hegreness; Roy Kishony
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 13.583

6.  Genome evolution and adaptation in a long-term experiment with Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Jeffrey E Barrick; Dong Su Yu; Sung Ho Yoon; Haeyoung Jeong; Tae Kwang Oh; Dominique Schneider; Richard E Lenski; Jihyun F Kim
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-18       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Comparative genome sequencing of Escherichia coli allows observation of bacterial evolution on a laboratory timescale.

Authors:  Christopher D Herring; Anu Raghunathan; Christiane Honisch; Trina Patel; M Kenyon Applebee; Andrew R Joyce; Thomas J Albert; Frederick R Blattner; Dirk van den Boom; Charles R Cantor; Bernhard Ø Palsson
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2006-11-05       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  The genetic basis of resistance to anticoagulants in rodents.

Authors:  Hans-Joachim Pelz; Simone Rost; Mirja Hünerberg; Andreas Fregin; Ann-Charlotte Heiberg; Kristof Baert; Alan D MacNicoll; Colin V Prescott; Anne-Sophie Walker; Johannes Oldenburg; Clemens R Müller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-05-06       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Characteristic genome rearrangements in experimental evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Maitreya J Dunham; Hassan Badrane; Tracy Ferea; Julian Adams; Patrick O Brown; Frank Rosenzweig; David Botstein
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-11-21       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Measuring differential gene expression by short read sequencing: quantitative comparison to 2-channel gene expression microarrays.

Authors:  Joshua S Bloom; Zia Khan; Leonid Kruglyak; Mona Singh; Amy A Caudy
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 3.969

View more
  193 in total

1.  Heterozygote advantage as a natural consequence of adaptation in diploids.

Authors:  Diamantis Sellis; Benjamin J Callahan; Dmitri A Petrov; Philipp W Messer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Properties and power of the Drosophila Synthetic Population Resource for the routine dissection of complex traits.

Authors:  Elizabeth G King; Stuart J Macdonald; Anthony D Long
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-04-13       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 3.  New insights into bacterial adaptation through in vivo and in silico experimental evolution.

Authors:  Thomas Hindré; Carole Knibbe; Guillaume Beslon; Dominique Schneider
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 60.633

4.  Investigating natural variation in Drosophila courtship song by the evolve and resequence approach.

Authors:  Thomas L Turner; Paige M Miller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Molecular spandrels: tests of adaptation at the genetic level.

Authors:  Rowan D H Barrett; Hopi E Hoekstra
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Evolution: Drosophila don't make a clean sweep.

Authors:  Mary Muers
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 53.242

7.  Three types of rescue can avert extinction in a changing environment.

Authors:  Ruth A Hufbauer; Marianna Szűcs; Emily Kasyon; Courtney Youngberg; Michael J Koontz; Christopher Richards; Ty Tuff; Brett A Melbourne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-08-03       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Evolution of stickleback in 50 years on earthquake-uplifted islands.

Authors:  Emily A Lescak; Susan L Bassham; Julian Catchen; Ofer Gelmond; Mary L Sherbick; Frank A von Hippel; William A Cresko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Natural history collections as windows on evolutionary processes.

Authors:  Michael W Holmes; Talisin T Hammond; Guinevere O U Wogan; Rachel E Walsh; Katie LaBarbera; Elizabeth A Wommack; Felipe M Martins; Jeremy C Crawford; Katya L Mack; Luke M Bloch; Michael W Nachman
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 6.185

10.  The Genomic Impacts of Drift and Selection for Hybrid Performance in Maize.

Authors:  Justin P Gerke; Jode W Edwards; Katherine E Guill; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra; Michael D McMullen
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.