Katharina Breininger1, Shadi Albarqouni2, Tanja Kurzendorfer3,4, Marcus Pfister4, Markus Kowarschik4, Andreas Maier3,5. 1. Pattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. katharina.breininger@fau.de. 2. Computer Aided Medical Procedures (CAMP), Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany. 3. Pattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany. 4. Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Forchheim, Germany. 5. School of Advanced Optical Techniques (SAOT), Erlangen, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Fusion of preoperative data with intraoperative X-ray images has proven the potential to reduce radiation exposure and contrast agent, especially for complex endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). Due to patient movement and introduced devices that deform the vasculature, the fusion can become inaccurate. This is usually detected by comparing the preoperative information with the contrasted vessel. To avoid repeated use of iodine, comparison with an implanted stent can be used to adjust the fusion. However, detecting the stent automatically without the use of contrast is challenging as only thin stent wires are visible. METHOD: We propose a fast, learning-based method to segment aortic stents in single uncontrasted X-ray images. To this end, we employ a fully convolutional network with residual units. Additionally, we investigate whether incorporation of prior knowledge improves the segmentation. RESULTS: We use 36 X-ray images acquired during EVAR for training and evaluate the segmentation on 27 additional images. We achieve a Dice coefficient of 0.933 (AUC 0.996) when using X-ray alone, and 0.918 (AUC 0.993) and 0.888 (AUC 0.99) when adding the preoperative model, and information about the expected wire width, respectively. CONCLUSION: The proposed method is fully automatic, fast and segments aortic stent grafts in fluoroscopic images with high accuracy. The quality and performance of the segmentation will allow for an intraoperative comparison with the preoperative information to assess the accuracy of the fusion.
PURPOSE: Fusion of preoperative data with intraoperative X-ray images has proven the potential to reduce radiation exposure and contrast agent, especially for complex endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). Due to patient movement and introduced devices that deform the vasculature, the fusion can become inaccurate. This is usually detected by comparing the preoperative information with the contrasted vessel. To avoid repeated use of iodine, comparison with an implanted stent can be used to adjust the fusion. However, detecting the stent automatically without the use of contrast is challenging as only thin stent wires are visible. METHOD: We propose a fast, learning-based method to segment aortic stents in single uncontrasted X-ray images. To this end, we employ a fully convolutional network with residual units. Additionally, we investigate whether incorporation of prior knowledge improves the segmentation. RESULTS: We use 36 X-ray images acquired during EVAR for training and evaluate the segmentation on 27 additional images. We achieve a Dice coefficient of 0.933 (AUC 0.996) when using X-ray alone, and 0.918 (AUC 0.993) and 0.888 (AUC 0.99) when adding the preoperative model, and information about the expected wire width, respectively. CONCLUSION: The proposed method is fully automatic, fast and segments aortic stent grafts in fluoroscopic images with high accuracy. The quality and performance of the segmentation will allow for an intraoperative comparison with the preoperative information to assess the accuracy of the fusion.
Authors: Matthias Hoffmann; Alexander Brost; Martin Koch; Felix Bourier; Andreas Maier; Klaus Kurzidim; Norbert Strobel; Joachim Hornegger Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2015-09-28 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: J Gindre; A Bel-Brunon; M Rochette; A Lucas; A Kaladji; P Haigron; A Combescure Journal: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Date: 2016-07-07 Impact factor: 4.538
Authors: Almar Klein; J Adam van der Vliet; Luuk J Oostveen; Yvonne Hoogeveen; Leo J Schultze Kool; W Klaas Jan Renema; Cornelis H Slump Journal: Med Image Anal Date: 2011-05-31 Impact factor: 8.545
Authors: A Hertault; B Maurel; J Sobocinski; T Martin Gonzalez; M Le Roux; R Azzaoui; M Midulla; S Haulon Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: Michael M McNally; Salvatore T Scali; Robert J Feezor; Daniel Neal; Thomas S Huber; Adam W Beck Journal: J Vasc Surg Date: 2014-08-28 Impact factor: 4.268
Authors: Simon Lessard; Claude Kauffmann; Marcus Pfister; Guy Cloutier; Éric Thérasse; Jacques A de Guise; Gilles Soulez Journal: Med Eng Phys Date: 2015-09-09 Impact factor: 2.242
Authors: Katharina Breininger; Moritz Hanika; Mareike Weule; Markus Kowarschik; Marcus Pfister; Andreas Maier Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2019-08-22 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Robert B Grupp; Mathias Unberath; Cong Gao; Rachel A Hegeman; Ryan J Murphy; Clayton P Alexander; Yoshito Otake; Benjamin A McArthur; Mehran Armand; Russell H Taylor Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2020-04-24 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Madelaine Hettler; Julia Kitz; Ali Seif Amir Hosseini; Manuel Guhlich; Babak Panahi; Jennifer Ernst; Lena-Christin Conradi; Michael Ghadimi; Philipp Ströbel; Jens Jakob Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-09-05 Impact factor: 6.575