Literature DB >> 32333361

Automatic annotation of hip anatomy in fluoroscopy for robust and efficient 2D/3D registration.

Robert B Grupp1, Mathias Unberath2, Cong Gao2, Rachel A Hegeman3, Ryan J Murphy4, Clayton P Alexander5, Yoshito Otake6, Benjamin A McArthur7,8, Mehran Armand3,5,9, Russell H Taylor2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Fluoroscopy is the standard imaging modality used to guide hip surgery and is therefore a natural sensor for computer-assisted navigation. In order to efficiently solve the complex registration problems presented during navigation, human-assisted annotations of the intraoperative image are typically required. This manual initialization interferes with the surgical workflow and diminishes any advantages gained from navigation. In this paper, we propose a method for fully automatic registration using anatomical annotations produced by a neural network.
METHODS: Neural networks are trained to simultaneously segment anatomy and identify landmarks in fluoroscopy. Training data are obtained using a computationally intensive, intraoperatively incompatible, 2D/3D registration of the pelvis and each femur. Ground truth 2D segmentation labels and anatomical landmark locations are established using projected 3D annotations. Intraoperative registration couples a traditional intensity-based strategy with annotations inferred by the network and requires no human assistance.
RESULTS: Ground truth segmentation labels and anatomical landmarks were obtained in 366 fluoroscopic images across 6 cadaveric specimens. In a leave-one-subject-out experiment, networks trained on these data obtained mean dice coefficients for left and right hemipelves, left and right femurs of 0.86, 0.87, 0.90, and 0.84, respectively. The mean 2D landmark localization error was 5.0 mm. The pelvis was registered within [Formula: see text] for 86% of the images when using the proposed intraoperative approach with an average runtime of 7 s. In comparison, an intensity-only approach without manual initialization registered the pelvis to [Formula: see text] in 18% of images.
CONCLUSIONS: We have created the first accurately annotated, non-synthetic, dataset of hip fluoroscopy. By using these annotations as training data for neural networks, state-of-the-art performance in fluoroscopic segmentation and landmark localization was achieved. Integrating these annotations allows for a robust, fully automatic, and efficient intraoperative registration during fluoroscopic navigation of the hip.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2D/3D registration; Landmark detection; Orthopedics; Semantic segmentation; X-ray navigation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32333361      PMCID: PMC7263976          DOI: 10.1007/s11548-020-02162-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  16 in total

Review 1.  Completely derandomized self-adaptation in evolution strategies.

Authors:  N Hansen; A Ostermeier
Journal:  Evol Comput       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.277

Review 2.  A review of 3D/2D registration methods for image-guided interventions.

Authors:  P Markelj; D Tomaževič; B Likar; F Pernuš
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Role of navigation in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Todd C Kelley; Michael L Swank
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Accuracy of Fluoroscopic Guided Acetabular Component Positioning During Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eric M Slotkin; Preetesh D Patel; Juan C Suarez
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Enabling machine learning in X-ray-based procedures via realistic simulation of image formation.

Authors:  Mathias Unberath; Jan-Nico Zaech; Cong Gao; Bastian Bier; Florian Goldmann; Sing Chun Lee; Javad Fotouhi; Russell Taylor; Mehran Armand; Nassir Navab
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-06-11       Impact factor: 2.924

6.  Learning to detect anatomical landmarks of the pelvis in X-rays from arbitrary views.

Authors:  Bastian Bier; Florian Goldmann; Jan-Nico Zaech; Javad Fotouhi; Rachel Hegeman; Robert Grupp; Mehran Armand; Greg Osgood; Nassir Navab; Andreas Maier; Mathias Unberath
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-04-20       Impact factor: 2.924

Review 7.  Review of 2-D/3-D Reconstruction Using Statistical Shape and Intensity Models and X-Ray Image Synthesis: Toward a Unified Framework.

Authors:  Cornelius Johannes Frederik Reyneke; Marcel Luthi; Valerie Burdin; Tania S Douglas; Thomas Vetter; Tinashe E M Mutsvangwa
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-10-17

8.  Intraoperative stent segmentation in X-ray fluoroscopy for endovascular aortic repair.

Authors:  Katharina Breininger; Shadi Albarqouni; Tanja Kurzendorfer; Marcus Pfister; Markus Kowarschik; Andreas Maier
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Visual intraoperative estimation of cup and stem position is not reliable in minimally invasive hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael Woerner; Ernst Sendtner; Robert Springorum; Benjamin Craiovan; Michael Worlicek; Tobias Renkawitz; Joachim Grifka; Markus Weber
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 3.717

10.  A fluoroscopy-based planning and guidance software tool for minimally invasive hip refixation by cement injection.

Authors:  Daniel F Malan; Stéfan J van der Walt; Renata G Raidou; Bas van den Berg; Berend C Stoel; Charl P Botha; Rob G H H Nelissen; Edward R Valstar
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.924

View more
  4 in total

1.  Fiducial-Free 2D/3D Registration for Robot-Assisted Femoroplasty.

Authors:  Cong Gao; Amirhossein Farvardin; Robert B Grupp; Mahsan Bakhtiarinejad; Liuhong Ma; Mareike Thies; Mathias Unberath; Russell H Taylor; Mehran Armand
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Robot Bionics       Date:  2020-07-28

2.  A new 2D-3D registration gold-standard dataset for the hip joint based on uncertainty modeling.

Authors:  Fabio D'Isidoro; Christophe Chênes; Stephen J Ferguson; Jérôme Schmid
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-08-17       Impact factor: 4.506

Review 3.  Surgical data science - from concepts toward clinical translation.

Authors:  Lena Maier-Hein; Matthias Eisenmann; Duygu Sarikaya; Keno März; Toby Collins; Anand Malpani; Johannes Fallert; Hubertus Feussner; Stamatia Giannarou; Pietro Mascagni; Hirenkumar Nakawala; Adrian Park; Carla Pugh; Danail Stoyanov; Swaroop S Vedula; Kevin Cleary; Gabor Fichtinger; Germain Forestier; Bernard Gibaud; Teodor Grantcharov; Makoto Hashizume; Doreen Heckmann-Nötzel; Hannes G Kenngott; Ron Kikinis; Lars Mündermann; Nassir Navab; Sinan Onogur; Tobias Roß; Raphael Sznitman; Russell H Taylor; Minu D Tizabi; Martin Wagner; Gregory D Hager; Thomas Neumuth; Nicolas Padoy; Justin Collins; Ines Gockel; Jan Goedeke; Daniel A Hashimoto; Luc Joyeux; Kyle Lam; Daniel R Leff; Amin Madani; Hani J Marcus; Ozanan Meireles; Alexander Seitel; Dogu Teber; Frank Ückert; Beat P Müller-Stich; Pierre Jannin; Stefanie Speidel
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 13.828

4.  Fluoroscopic Navigation for a Surgical Robotic System Including a Continuum Manipulator.

Authors:  Cong Gao; Henry Phalen; Shahriar Sefati; Justin Ma; Russell Taylor; Mathias Unberath; Mehran Armand
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-12-24       Impact factor: 4.538

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.