Literature DB >> 27392338

Patient-Specific Finite-Element Simulation of the Insertion of Guidewire During an EVAR Procedure: Guidewire Position Prediction Validation on 28 Cases.

J Gindre, A Bel-Brunon, M Rochette, A Lucas, A Kaladji, P Haigron, A Combescure.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Validation of a numerical method to compute arterial deformations under the insertion of an "extra-siff" guidewire during Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm.
METHODS: We propose the validation of a previously developed simulation method. The model is calibrated using anatomical hypothesis and intraoperative observations. Simulation results are blindly evaluated against 3-D imaging data acquired during the surgical procedure on 28 patients, based on the predicted position of the intraoperative guidewire.
RESULTS: Simulation was successfully conducted on the 28 patients. The mean position error given by the Modified Hausdorff Distance for the 28 cases was 3.8 ± 1.9 mm, which demonstrates very good results for most of the cases.
CONCLUSION: The work reported here shows that numerical simulation can predict some rather large variations in the vascular geometry due to tools insertion, for a wide variety of aorto-iliac morphologies. This is a new step toward clinically applicable mechanical simulation. SIGNIFICANCE: Validation on 3-D intraoperative data on a large number of cases-robustness on adverse anatomies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27392338     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2016.2587362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  5 in total

1.  Simultaneous reconstruction of multiple stiff wires from a single X-ray projection for endovascular aortic repair.

Authors:  Katharina Breininger; Moritz Hanika; Mareike Weule; Markus Kowarschik; Marcus Pfister; Andreas Maier
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Target vessel displacement during fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair and its implications for the role of traditional computed tomography angiography roadmaps.

Authors:  Marloes M Jansen; Merel van der Stelt; Stefan P M Smorenburg; Cornelis H Slump; Joost A van Herwaarden; Constantijn E V B Hazenberg
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-09

3.  Intraoperative stent segmentation in X-ray fluoroscopy for endovascular aortic repair.

Authors:  Katharina Breininger; Shadi Albarqouni; Tanja Kurzendorfer; Marcus Pfister; Markus Kowarschik; Andreas Maier
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  Image Fusion During Standard and Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair, to Fuse or Not to Fuse? A Meta-analysis and Additional Data From a Single-Center Retrospective Cohort.

Authors:  Sabrina A N Doelare; Stefan P M Smorenburg; Theodorus G van Schaik; Jan D Blankensteijn; Willem Wisselink; Johanna H Nederhoed; Rutger J Lely; Arjan W J Hoksbergen; Kak Khee Yeung
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 3.487

5.  Evaluation and Verification of Fast Computational Simulations of Stent-Graft Deployment in Endovascular Aneurysmal Repair.

Authors:  Aymeric Pionteck; Baptiste Pierrat; Sébastien Gorges; Jean-Noël Albertini; Stéphane Avril
Journal:  Front Med Technol       Date:  2021-07-20
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.