| Literature DB >> 29743620 |
In-Ho Bae1,2, Myung Ho Jeong3,4,5, Kyung Seob Lim1,2, Dae Sung Park1,2,6, Jae Won Shim1,2, Jun-Kyu Park1, Kwang Hwan Oh7, Mi Rim Jin1, Doo Sun Sim1,2,8.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to fabricate a novel polymer-free everolimus-eluting stent with nanostructure using a femtosecond laser (FSL). The stent were coated with everolimus (EVL) using FSL and electrospinning processes. The surface was rendered hydrophobic, which negatively affected both platelet adhesion (82.1%) and smooth muscle cell response. Animal study was performed using a porcine coronary restenosis model. The study groups were divided into 1) bare metal stent (BMS), 2) poly(L-lactide) (PLA)-based EVL drug eluting stent (DES), 3) commercial EVL-eluting DES, and 4) FSL-EVL-DES. After four weeks of stent implantation, various analyses were performed. Quantitative analysis showed that the amount of in-stent restenosis was higher in the BMS group (BMS; 27.8 ± 2.68%, PLA-based DES; 12.2 ± 0.57%, commercial DES; 9.8 ± 0.28%, and FSL-DES; 9.3 ± 0.25%, n = 10, p < 0.05). Specifically, the inflammation score was reduced in the FSL-DES group (1.9 ± 0.39, n = 10, p < 0.05). The increment in re-endothelialization in the FSL-DES group was confirmed by immunofluorescence analysis. Taken together, the novel polymer-free EVL-eluting stent fabricated using FSL can be an innovative DES with reduced risk of ISR, thrombosis, and inflammation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29743620 PMCID: PMC5943357 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-25629-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Morphological analysis after femtosecond laser irradiation. Representative SEM images of surfaces 2-D plates (a) and 3-D tubular stents (b) under various irradiation conditions. Representative images of patterning and pores on stent surfaces after femtosecond laser irradiation (c).
Figure 2Mechanical properties of stent pre- and post-femtosecond laser irradiation. The indicated values are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 10). NS, not statistically significant.
Figure 3Measurements of surface wettability. Images of surface static contact angles of the stents were represented and analyzed. The indicated values are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 10).
Figure 4Platelet adhesion and smooth muscle cell response after femtosecond laser irradiation. Representative images and image analysis of platelet adhesion (a) and SMC migration (b) XTT analysis for SMC proliferation. (c) The indicated values are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 10).
Figure 5Amount of everolimus on surfaces and in vitro release velocities. The amount of EVL on the stent surfaces after washing with PBS. (a) In vitro cumulative EVL released from surfaces. (b) The amount of everolimus was measured using UV-visible spectrophotometer at designated time points. The indicated values are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 10). NS, not statistically significant.
Figure 6Quantitative analysis of animal study. After 4 weeks of implantation, the vessels surrounding stents were isolated and subjected to OCT (a) and microCT (b) analysis. Representative images of each was shown (n = 10).
Figure 7Histological analysis of the porcine coronary restenosis model. After 4 weeks of implantation, the vessels surrounding stents were isolated and subjected to H&E and Carstair’s fibrin staining. Representative images of sections (a) and histomorphometric analyses (b) are shown. Magnifications of the cross-sectional slices were 25×. (n = 10), NS, not statistically significant.