Femtosecond (fs) laser-based intracellular nanosurgery has become an important tool in cell biology, albeit the mechanisms in the so-called low-density plasma regime are largely unknown. Previous calculations of free-electron densities for intracellular surgery used water as a model substance for biological media and neglected the presence of dye and biomolecules. In addition, it is still unclear on which time scales free-electron and free-radical induced chemical effects take place in a cellular environment. Here, we present our experimental study on the influence of laser parameters and staining on the intracellular ablation threshold in the low-density plasma regime. We found that the ablation effect of fs laser pulse trains resulted from the accumulation of single-shot multiphoton-induced photochemical effects finished within a few nanoseconds. At the threshold, the number of applied pulses was inversely proportional to a higher order of the irradiance, depending on the laser repetition rate and wavelength. Furthermore, fluorescence staining of subcellular structures before surgery significantly decreased the ablation threshold. Based on our findings, we propose that dye molecules are the major source for providing seed electrons for the ionization cascade. Consequently, future calculations of free-electron densities for intracellular nanosurgery have to take them into account, especially in the calculations of multiphoton ionization rates.
Femtosecond (fs) laser-based intracellular nanosurgery has become an important tool in cell biology, albeit the mechanisms in the so-called low-density plasma regime are largely unknown. Previous calculations of free-electron densities for intracellular surgery used water as a model substance for biological media and neglected the presence of dye and biomolecules. In addition, it is still unclear on which time scales free-electron and free-radical induced chemical effects take place in a cellular environment. Here, we present our experimental study on the influence of laser parameters and staining on the intracellular ablation threshold in the low-density plasma regime. We found that the ablation effect of fs laser pulse trains resulted from the accumulation of single-shot multiphoton-induced photochemical effects finished within a few nanoseconds. At the threshold, the number of applied pulses was inversely proportional to a higher order of the irradiance, depending on the laser repetition rate and wavelength. Furthermore, fluorescence staining of subcellular structures before surgery significantly decreased the ablation threshold. Based on our findings, we propose that dye molecules are the major source for providing seed electrons for the ionization cascade. Consequently, future calculations of free-electron densities for intracellular nanosurgery have to take them into account, especially in the calculations of multiphoton ionization rates.
Since its first demonstration by Koenig et al. in 1999 [1], femtosecond (fs) laser cell surgery has proven to be an
excellent tool for minimally invasive and extremely precise manipulation of single
cells, both in-vitro [2-5] and
in-vivo [6-9]. When fs laser
pulses are focused by high numerical aperture objectives (NA ≥ 0.8) into
biological media, the created photon densities are sufficient to induce multiphoton
ionization in a sub-femtoliter volume. Together with cascade ionization, very high
free-electron densities are generated, resulting in plasma-mediated ablation of
biological material with cut sizes below 100 nm [2,10].Intracellular nanosurgery with fs laser pulses has become an important tool in cell
biology. Cutting single cytoskeletal fibers without affecting adjacent structures
allows for local perturbation of the cytoskeleton [11,12]. This process helps to
understand the organization and function of this key cellular structure and provides
insight into cell motility, differentiation, and apoptosis [13]. Selective disruption of individual mitochondria can be
used to study their role in energy production, cell death and subcellular
homeostasis [4,14]. Recently, automated ablation of entire metaphase plates in
porcine oocytes has been published by our group [15]. This method may serve as an alternative for conventional
highly-invasive enucleation techniques of somatic cell cloning. As the contrast
between subcellular structures is usually very weak in all of these applications,
the organelle of interest has to be stained with fluorescent dyes or tagged with
fluorescent proteins. Therefore, intracellular nanosurgery is often combined with
fluorescence [11], confocal laser scanning
[4,13,14] or multiphoton microscopy
[12,15].Two parameter regimes have been established for fs laser cell surgery. One approach
employs one to several hundred amplified pulses with repetition rates around 1 kHz
and pulse energies of a few to tens of nanojoule [4,11,16]. In this regime, the generated free-electron densities are
likely sufficient to induce cavitation bubble and shock wave formation. The abrupt
expansion of the cavitation bubble causes photodisruption in biological media [17,18].
The other approach uses long pulse trains (several thousand to million pulses) from
laser oscillators with repetition rates around 80 MHz and pulse energies well below
the optical breakdown threshold [2,12, 14].
A so-called low-density plasma is produced in this regime which leads to
free-electron induced chemical decomposition (bond breaking) of biomolecules [10, 19,
20]. In addition reactive oxygen species
(ROS) are yielded by multiphoton ionization and dissociation of water molecules,
such as the hydroxyl radical (OH•) or
superoxide (O-2) [21]. ROS are known to react efficiently with biomolecules, such
as DNA bases, and may induce cell death at high concentrations [22-24]. The accumulation of the
described chemical effects over many pulses leads to ablation of biological
material.Although extensive theoretical work has been done by Vogel et al. to understand the
fundamental mechanisms in the low-density plasma regime, their calculations of
free-electron densities used water as a model substance for biological media [10]. The influence of dye and biomolecules on
the multiphoton and cascade ionization rates was neglected. However, Koenig et al.
showed that labeling single chromosomes with Giemsa reduced the ablation threshold
by a factor of 2.7 [2]. Furthermore, it is
still unclear on which time scales free-radical and free-electron induced chemical
effects take place in a cellular environment. Nikogosyan et al. showed that
photochemical processes leading to generation of ROS in aqueous solution can be
classified into fast and slow reactions with time constants in the nano- to
microsecond and millisecond range, respectively [21]. Recent experimental studies by our group revealed an influence of the
laser repetition rate on the efficiency of ROS formation in cells and tissue [25, 26].
Consequently, the time interval between two successive laser pulses may affect the
ablation threshold of subcellular structures.In this paper, we investigated the influence of laser parameters and staining on the
ablation threshold of subcellular structures in the low-density plasma regime.
Hoechst-stained cell nuclei, used as a model substance for intracellular surgery,
were irradiated in arbitrarily selected areas while the extent of apparent
photodamage was evaluated using two-photon microscopy.The laser system used in this study was a tunable Ti:sapphire laser (Chameleon
Ultra II, Coherent) which generates ultrashort pulses of 140 fs at a repetition
rate of 80 MHz with a M2 < 1.1 beam
quality. The accessible wavelength ranges from 680 to 1080 nm and the maximum
pulse energy at 800 nm is 44 nJ at the laser output. An acousto optical pulse
picker (Pulse Select, APE GmbH) was applied to regulate the pulse frequency for
the manipulation of single cells by selecting pulses of the laser beam with a
division ratio between 1:20 and 1:80000 (corresponding to 4 MHz and 1 kHz).
These pulses are diffracted into the first order with a diffraction angle of
approximately 3.5°. The diffracted and initial laser beam were used
for cell manipulation and multiphoton microscopy, respectively (see manipulation
and imaging beam in Fig. 1).
Fig. 1.
Schematic setup for multiphoton imaging and manipulation of single
cells.
Schematic setup for multiphoton imaging and manipulation of single
cells.Both laser beams were guided through a mechanical shutter and an attenuator,
consisting of a half-wave plate and a polarizing beamsplitter cube, before being
superimposed. After entering the tubus of an inverted microscope (Axiovert 100,
Carl Zeiss AG) via a dichroic mirror, they were focused into the sample by a
1.3-NA oil immersion objective (Plan-Neofluar, Carl Zeiss AG). At a central
wavelength of 720 nm, this results in a theoretical diffraction-limited spot
diameter of approximately 1080 nm. Because of dispersion in the optics, the
pulse duration in the sample was between 230 and 280 fs over the wavelength
range determined with the autocorrelator ”CARPE” (APE
GmbH). Laser beam scanning in the x-y plane was achieved by a pair of high-speed
galvanometer mirrors (Cambridge Technology). A piezoelectric objective-lens
positioning system (nanoMIPOS 400, Piezosystem Jena GmbH) was used to move the
laser focus along the z-axis. The fluorescence induced by multiphoton excitation
at low pulse energies around 0.05 nJ passed the objective and the dichroic
mirror in the backward direction and was detected by a photomultiplier tube
(R6357, Hamamatsu Photonics).Bovine endothelial cells were cultivated in glass bottom dishes with a thickness
of 170 μm (MatTek Corporation) using RPMI 1640
medium (Roswell Park Memorial Institute) supplemented with 10% FCS (fetal calf
serum) and the antibiotics penicillin, streptomycin, and partricin at
37°C and 5% CO2 humidified
atmosphere. The dyes used in our experiments were the nucleic acid stains
Hoechst 33342 (Invitrogen; final concentration: 5
μg/ml) and SYBR Green I (Invitrogen; final
concentration: 1:1000 of the original 10,000x stock solution) and the membrane
stain FM4-64 (Invitrogen; final concentration: 6
μg/ml).For the live cell experiments, nuclear DNA was stained with Hoechst 33342 for 10
minutes at 37°C. Prior to imaging and manipulation,
cells were transferred into RPMI medium. The glass bottom dishes were placed
into a microscope stage incubation system (Okolab), which was set to
37°C and 5% CO2 humidified
atmosphere.For the fixed cell experiments, cells were fixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde (Sigma
Aldrich) in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) for 20 minutes and stained with
either FM4-64 or both Hoechst 33342 and FM4-64 for 10 minutes. After imaging and
manipulation in PBS medium at room temperature, cells were re-stained with
Hoechst 33342.Two-photon excitation of Hoechst 33342 and FM4-64 was done at a central
wavelength of 720 and 800 nm, respectively, which corresponds to the two-photon
absorption maximum of the Hoechst 33342 dye in this range [27]. For cell manipulation, the laser beam was either
focused on a single point or scanned along a line in an arbitrarily selected
area of the nucleus. Multiphoton microscopy images of each cell before and after
manipulation were compared to evaluate the extent of apparent photodamage.
Re-staining of the cells with Hoechst 33342 and SYBR Green I was done to
discriminate photobleaching and ablation. The FWHM-width of the damaged region
was measured by averaging over three positions along the laser cut.Varying the laser pulse energy for line cutting in stained cell nuclei at a fixed
wavelength, repetition rate and spatial pulse overlap exhibited three distinct
regimes. Above the first threshold, a clear dip in fluorescence could be observed a
few minutes after irradiation [see Fig.
2(a)]. Above the second threshold, which was approximately 50% higher, the
dip in fluorescence appeared directly after irradiation [see Fig. 2(b)]. Re-staining experiments with different nucleid
acid stains resulted in a fluorescence recovery of the damaged region in the first,
but not in the second case. Therefore, they are most likely corresponding to the
photobleaching and ablation thresholds, which were first demonstrated and studied by
Heisterkamp et al. [11]. Manipulation of more
than 20 cells per pulse energy revealed that the ablation threshold varied about 30
percent from cell to cell [see Fig. 2(c)].
Consequently, an ablation probability of 100 % in at least ten cell nuclei was
defined as the overall ablation threshold in all further experiments.
Fig. 2.
(a,b) Multiphoton microscopy images of live Hoechst stained cell nuclei
directly after and two minutes after line cutting (indicated by black
triangles) and after re-staining. At pulse energies in the photobleaching
regime, a clear dip in fluorescence could be observed after a few minutes.
Above the ablation threshold, the dip in fluorescence occurred directly
after irradiation. Scale bar: 3 μm. (c) Ablation
probability as a function of the pulse energy at a fixed repetition rate of
40 kHz, a central wavelength of 720 nm and 200 pulses per micrometer (n
≥ 20 for each data point).
(a,b) Multiphoton microscopy images of live Hoechst stained cell nuclei
directly after and two minutes after line cutting (indicated by black
triangles) and after re-staining. At pulse energies in the photobleaching
regime, a clear dip in fluorescence could be observed after a few minutes.
Above the ablation threshold, the dip in fluorescence occurred directly
after irradiation. Scale bar: 3 μm. (c) Ablation
probability as a function of the pulse energy at a fixed repetition rate of
40 kHz, a central wavelength of 720 nm and 200 pulses per micrometer (n
≥ 20 for each data point).To evaluate the influence of the time interval between two successive laser pulses on
the ablation threshold, we varied the repetition rate between 1 kHz and 80 MHz at a
central wavelength of 720 nm. The radiant energy density, defined as the number of
laser pulses per micrometer, was kept constant by simultaneously adjusting the
scanning speed of the line cuts. No significant influence of the laser repetition
rate on the ablation threshold was observed for each constant radiant energy density
[see Fig. 3(a)]. However, the threshold
pulse energy increased from 0.25 nJ at 40,000 pulses per micrometer to 1.3 nJ at 100
pulses per micrometer. Changing the line scanning speed at a fixed repetition rate
showed that the exposure time per micrometer was inversely proportional to
approximately the fourth power of irradiance [see solid line in Fig. 3(b)]. With 5 mM ascorbic acid as an additional
antioxidant in the culture medium, the same threshold pulse energies were measured
(data not shown).
Fig. 3.
(a) Ablation threshold pulse energy for line cuts in live Hoechst stained
cell nuclei as a function of the repetition rate at different numbers of
pulses per micrometer. No significant influence of the repetition rate was
observed. (b) Ablation threshold irradiance as a function of the exposure
time per micrometer at a fixed repetition rate of 40 kHz. The exposure time
was inversely proportional to approximately the fourth power of irradiance
(solid line). A central wavelength of 720 nm was used in all cases. Each
data point represents the mean ± standard deviation of at least
five experiments.
The influence of Hoechst molecules on the ablation process was studied by comparing
the threshold pulse energies with and without previous Hoechst staining at a central
wavelength of 720 nm. In this experiment, the time interval between manipulation and
evaluation of the ablation was about 15 minutes due to cell re-staining. Because
line cuts often disappeared in live cells over this time period as a result of
chromatin movement, fixed cells were used instead. Concerning the ablation
threshold, no difference was measured between live and fixed cell nuclei (data not
shown). Membrane staining was done to identify the cell nucleus without Hoechst
staining. At 1 MHz repetition rate and 20,000 pulses per micrometer each with 1.5
nJ, a clear dip in fluorescence was observed with Hoechst staining while no ablation
occurred without it [see Fig. 4(a) and 4(b)]. In a logarithmic plot of the ablation
probability vs. the pulse energy, the same slope was observed in both cases [see
Fig. 4(c)]. However, the threshold pulse
energy was a factor four lower with Hoechst staining. In agreement with Fig. 3, no influence of the repetition rate
was observed without Hoechst staining [see slopes of 50 kHz and 1 MHz in Fig. 4(c)].
Fig. 4.
Influence of Hoechst staining on the ablation threshold for line cuts in
fixed cell nuclei. A central wavelength of 720 nm and 20,000 pulses per
micrometer were used. Multiphoton microscopy images of (a) Hoechst / FM4-64
stained and (b) FM4-64 stained cell nuclei (a1;b1) before and (a2;b2) after
line cutting at 1.5 nJ pulse energy (indicated by black triangles) and
Hoechst re-staining. Scale bar: 3 μm. (c)
Ablation probability as a function of the logarithmic pulse energy with and
without Hoechst staining before line cutting. The ablation threshold was a
factor four lower with Hoechst staining (n=3 experiments for each data
point, the values represent the means ± standard deviation).
(a) Ablation threshold pulse energy for line cuts in live Hoechst stained
cell nuclei as a function of the repetition rate at different numbers of
pulses per micrometer. No significant influence of the repetition rate was
observed. (b) Ablation threshold irradiance as a function of the exposure
time per micrometer at a fixed repetition rate of 40 kHz. The exposure time
was inversely proportional to approximately the fourth power of irradiance
(solid line). A central wavelength of 720 nm was used in all cases. Each
data point represents the mean ± standard deviation of at least
five experiments.Influence of Hoechst staining on the ablation threshold for line cuts in
fixed cell nuclei. A central wavelength of 720 nm and 20,000 pulses per
micrometer were used. Multiphoton microscopy images of (a) Hoechst / FM4-64
stained and (b) FM4-64 stained cell nuclei (a1;b1) before and (a2;b2) after
line cutting at 1.5 nJ pulse energy (indicated by black triangles) and
Hoechst re-staining. Scale bar: 3 μm. (c)
Ablation probability as a function of the logarithmic pulse energy with and
without Hoechst staining before line cutting. The ablation threshold was a
factor four lower with Hoechst staining (n=3 experiments for each data
point, the values represent the means ± standard deviation).(a) Wavelength dependence of the ablation threshold pulse energy as a
function of the number of applied pulses on a single spot in live Hoechst
stained cell nuclei at repetition rates in the kHz regime. Solid lines show
the power-law fits for each wavelength. Between 840 and 950 nm, the scaling
exponent increased from k=4 to k=5. (b) Scaling exponent k as a function of
the laser wavelength at different repetition rates in the kHz regime and 80
MHz. Each data point represents the mean ± standard deviation of
at least three experiments.We studied the dependence of the ablation threshold on the number of applied laser
pulses on a single spot (single point illumination). At a fixed repetition rate in
the kHz regime, different wavelengths were used, from which three are exemplarily
shown in Fig. 5(a). For each pulse train,
the threshold pulse energy increased with the wavelength. Compared to 720 nm, about
two-times and three-times higher pulse energies were required at 840 and 950 nm,
respectively [see Fig. 5(a)]. Power-law
fitting of the threshold data showed that the number of applied pulses was inversely
proportional to the fourth power of irradiance (scaling exponent k=4) at 720 and 840
nm and the fifth power of irradiance (k=5) at 950 nm. To determine the influence of
the repetition rate on this relationship, the same experiments were done at 80 MHz.
The scaling exponent was significantly lower at 720 nm (k=3.5) and 800 nm (k=3.8),
whereas no deviation was observed above 800 nm [see Fig. 5(b)].
Fig. 5.
(a) Wavelength dependence of the ablation threshold pulse energy as a
function of the number of applied pulses on a single spot in live Hoechst
stained cell nuclei at repetition rates in the kHz regime. Solid lines show
the power-law fits for each wavelength. Between 840 and 950 nm, the scaling
exponent increased from k=4 to k=5. (b) Scaling exponent k as a function of
the laser wavelength at different repetition rates in the kHz regime and 80
MHz. Each data point represents the mean ± standard deviation of
at least three experiments.
The final set of experiments was done to determine the FWHM-width of the damaged
region above the ablation threshold. At a central wavelength of 720 nm, different
repetition rates between 20 kHz and 80 MHz were used. As expected, the width of the
damaged region increased with the laser pulse energy for all repetition rates (see
Fig. 6). Within the error bars, the same
slope was observed for all repetition rates up to 4 MHz. At 2,000 pulses per
micrometer, the FWHM-width increased from 0.35 μm at 1
nJ (two times the threshold energy) to about 0.7 μm at 5
nJ [see Fig. 6(a)]. Compared to repetition
rates below 4 MHz, the slope was significantly steeper at 80 MHz. At 100 pulses per
micrometer, the increase of the FWHM-width between two and five times the threshold
energy was about 20% stronger at 80 MHz than in the kHz regime [see Fig. 6(b)].
Fig. 6.
FWHM-widths of the damaged region in live Hoechst stained cell nuclei as a
function of the pulse energy at a central wavelength of 720 nm and different
repetition rates. The dashed lines indicate the ablation threshold. Each
data point represents the mean ± standard deviation of at least
ten cells. (a) 2,000 pulses per micrometer and (b) 40,000 pulses per
micrometer were used. No significant influence of the repetition rate was
observed up to 4 MHz. The increase of the FWHM-width was significantly
stronger at 80 MHz.
The presented results provide new insights into the mechanisms of femtosecond (fs)
laser-based intracellular nanosurgery in the low-density plasma regime. As the
localization of multiphoton absorption is maintained even in strongly scattering
tissue [28], the findings of this in-vitro
study can also be applied to in-vivo experiments (e.g. [6-9]).FWHM-widths of the damaged region in live Hoechst stained cell nuclei as a
function of the pulse energy at a central wavelength of 720 nm and different
repetition rates. The dashed lines indicate the ablation threshold. Each
data point represents the mean ± standard deviation of at least
ten cells. (a) 2,000 pulses per micrometer and (b) 40,000 pulses per
micrometer were used. No significant influence of the repetition rate was
observed up to 4 MHz. The increase of the FWHM-width was significantly
stronger at 80 MHz.To the best of our knowledge, no systematic study of the influence of the laser
wavelength and repetition rate on the intracellular ablation threshold has been done
to date. In our experiments, we used Hoechst-stained cell nuclei as a model
substance for intracellular nanosurgery, as fluorophores are usually required to
enhance the weak contrast between subcellular structures [4, 11, 12].At a constant radiant energy density (total laser energy per volume), the ablation
threshold for line cuts in stained cell nuclei slightly decreased with increasing
repetition rate from 1 kHz to 80 MHz. However, this difference was not significant
[see Fig. 3(a)]. From this result, two
conclusions can be drawn: thermal damage at high repetition rates does not play a
significant role and the ablation effect results predominantly from the accumulation
of single-shot photochemical damage. The first statement is supported by
calculations of the temperature evolution in the focal volume in aqueous solution
[10]. At the wavelength and numerical
aperture used in our experiments, the temperature increase is expected to be below
3°C at the ablation threshold, even at high
repetition rates around 80 MHz. As thermal effects can be neglected, free-radical
and free-electron induced chemical effects are most likely responsible for
intracellular ablation (see introduction). Based on the results in Fig. 3(a), we can deduce that the
photochemical processes of each pulse are finished within approximately 10 ns, being
the time interval between two successive pulses at 80 MHz. If these processes
originate from one-photon absorption, the exposure time would be inversely
proportional to the irradiance as stated by the so-called reciprocity law in
photobiology [29]. Our experiments revealed
that the exposure time was inversely proportional to approximately the fourth power
of irradiance at the ablation threshold [see Fig.
3(b)]. This indicates that multiphoton absorption is the precursor for
chemical damage during intracellular nanosurgery.Nikogosyan et al. showed that the hydroxyl radical
(OH•) is the only free radical produced
in sufficient amounts within a few nanoseconds [21]. The hydroxyl radical efficiently reacts with biomolecules, such as DNA,
at diffusion-controlled rates [22]. Its
half-life period in living cells is between 1 and 10 ns corresponding to the value
estimated from our experiments [30, 31]. In a previous publication by our group, we
showed that the total amount of free radicals was significantly decreased with an
additional antioxidant in the culture medium [25]. However, no change of the ablation threshold pulse energy was observed
at the same concentration (data not shown). As the hydroxyl radical is very
reactive, high antioxidant concentrations in the molar range are required to observe
a OH•-scavenging effect which do not
correspond to physiological conditions [32].
Thus, only relatively unreactive radicals, which are not responsible for
intracellular ablation, can be scavenged at the conditions used in our experiments.Although the calculations of optical breakdown thresholds by Vogel et al. are in very
good agreement with experimental results in aqueous solution [10,18], the used model
neglected the influence of dye and biomolecules on the multiphoton and cascade
ionization rates. Therefore, the course of the free-electron density as a function
of the laser pulse energy may significantly differ in a cellular environment. To
study the influence of dye molecules, we compared the ablation probabilities both
with and without Hoechst staining before line cutting. Without previous staining,
about a factor four higher pulse energies were required for the same ablation
probability [see Fig. 4(b)]. This behavior
has also been observed by other authors investigating the ablation threshold in
single chromosomes and the threshold for DNA double-strand break (DSB) formation.
Koenig et al. observed a reduction of the ablation threshold by a factor of 2.7 when
single chromosomes were labeled with Giemsa [2]. In addition, four [33] to ten
times [34] more pulse energy was required to
induce DSBs in cells without Hoechst staining. Consequently, dye molecules
significantly contribute to the production of free electrons and hence the formation
of low-density plasmas. According to the literature, a cell nucleus consists of 85%
water [35], 20% of the nuclear dry mass is
DNA [36] and one bound Hoechst molecule
exists per ten base pairs at the used dye concentration [37]. Thus, the ratio of water to Hoechst molecules is
approximately 10,000:1. From this calculation, we can conclude that Hoechst
molecules do not significantly contribute to the cascade ionization. However,
because of their high multiphoton absorption cross-section [38], they should enhance the multiphoton ionization rate to
provide additional seed electrons for the following cascade.In the low-density plasma regime, chemical effects accumulate with increasing number
of laser pulses, leading to a lower ablation threshold pulse energy. This has been
studied by several groups in dielectrics and metals as well as in biological tissue
[16, 39, 40]. The dependence of the
threshold pulse energy on the number of pulses can be described according to [40]:where N is the number of pulses and k describes the strength of the accumulation.
E1 and E are the
threshold pulse energies for a single shot and N pulses, respectively. Our
experiments revealed that the accumulation strength, being equivalent to the scaling
exponent in Fig. 5, was dependent on the
laser wavelength and repetition rate [see Fig.
5(b)]. In the kHz regime, the accumulation strength was constant for all
wavelengths between 720 and 840 nm (k=4). By contrast, this value increased from
k=3.5 to k=4 at 80 MHz repetition rate in the same wavelength range. Quite
surprisingly, an increase of the accumulation strength from k=4 to k=5 occurred
between 840 and 950 nm for all repetition rates.As described earlier in the discussion, intracellular ablation most likely results
from multiphoton-induced chemistry accumulating over multiple pulses. If we assume
that laser pulses do not significantly change the optical properties of the focal
volume up to the ablation effect, the damage to cellular structures should be the
same for each pulse. Consequently, the ablation effect for multiple pulses would be
an accumulation of single-shot damage. This leads to the same equation as Eq. (1), in which the accumulation strength
is equivalent to the multi-photon order inducing the photochemical effects.
Following this model, four and five photons are required to induce damage to the DNA
molecules at 840 and 950 nm, respectively, whereas both four- and five-photon
induced processes occur at 900 nm (k=4.3). As multiphoton ionization yields the seed
electrons for the ionization cascade and hence free-electron and free-radical
induced chemical effects, we assume that the multiphoton order corresponds to the
number of photons required for this process. Based on the results in Fig. 5(b), the ionization energy should be
between 5.2 and 5.9 eV which excludes water having a band-gap of 6.5 eV [21, 41].
However, it corresponds well to that of Hoechst molecules (approx. 5.5 eV) [42]. Therefore, Hoechst molecules are most
likely the major source for providing seed electrons.To support this hypothesis, we did similar experiments with RAT-1 fibroblasts stably
expressing the enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP) in the whole cell. Fitting
of the ablation threshold data with Eq. (1) yielded an accumulation strength of k=3 between 720 and 820 nm. The same
value has been obtained by Bourgeois et al. who used a wavelength of 780 nm at 1 kHz
to ablate GFP-labeled motor neurons [16].
Above 860 nm, however, we observed an increase of the accumulation strength to k=4.
Thus, the ionization energy of the major source for seed electrons should be between
4.3 and 4.5 eV corresponding to that of the single tryptophan residue of eGFP
(approx. 4.5 eV) [43].With the proposed model, the decrease of the accumulation strength at 80 MHz
repetition rate and wavelengths below 840 nm can be explained [see Fig. 5(b)]. Free electrons become hydrated
within 300 fs with a lifetime of around 0.25 μs in
concentrated solutions of biomolecules [23].
Therefore, many of them are still present when the next laser pulse arrives at
repetition rates above 4 MHz. As hydrated electrons absorb in the NIR wavelength
range with a maximum at 720 nm [21], seed
electrons are also produced by linear absorption at high repetition rates. The
resulting accumulation strength is a mixture between multiphoton ionization of
Hoechst molecules and linear absorption of hydrated electrons, leading to the
observed values (e.g. k=3.5 at 720 nm). Because of the production of additional seed
electrons at high repetition rates, the width of the damaged region increased
significantly stronger compared to the kHz regime [see Fig. 6(b)].In conclusion, we showed that the free-electron and free-radical induced chemical
effects during fs laser-based intracellular nanosurgery are finished within a few
nanoseconds. Thus, the ablation effect results from the accumulation of single-shot
damage at kHz and MHz repetition rates. In addition, we demonstrated the strong
influence of dye molecules on the ablation threshold. Future calculations of
free-electron densities for intracellular nanosurgery have to take them into
account, especially in the calculations of the multiphoton ionization rates. To
minimize the total delivered laser energy to cells, it is advantageous to use high
repetition rates at wavelengths between 700 and 800 nm, as residual hydrated
electrons can easily be ionized by linear absorption in this regime.
Authors: F Bestvater; E Spiess; G Stobrawa; M Hacker; T Feurer; T Porwol; U Berchner-Pfannschmidt; C Wotzlaw; H Acker Journal: J Microsc Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 1.758
Authors: Alina A Osychenko; Alexandr D Zalessky; Uliana A Tochilo; David Yu Martirosyan; Yulia Yu Silaeva; Victor A Nadtochenko Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2022-02-14 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Jessica P Mondia; Dany S Adams; Ryan D Orendorff; Michael Levin; Fiorenzo G Omenetto Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2011-07-27 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Dag Heinemann; Markus Schomaker; Stefan Kalies; Maximilian Schieck; Regina Carlson; Hugo Murua Escobar; Tammo Ripken; Heiko Meyer; Alexander Heisterkamp Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-03-11 Impact factor: 3.240