| Literature DB >> 29735944 |
Titilayo D O Falade1,2, Panagiotis K Chrysanthopoulos3,4, Mark P Hodson5,6, Yasmina Sultanbawa7, Mary Fletcher8, Ross Darnell9, Sam Korie10, Glen Fox11.
Abstract
Aflatoxin contamination is associated with the development of aflatoxigenic fungi such as Aspergillus flavus and A. parasiticus on food grains. This study was aimed at investigating metabolites produced during fungal development on maize and their correlation with aflatoxin levels. Maize cobs were harvested at R3 (milk), R4 (dough), and R5 (dent) stages of maturity. Individual kernels were inoculated in petri dishes with four doses of fungal spores. Fungal colonisation, metabolite profile, and aflatoxin levels were examined. Grain colonisation decreased with kernel maturity: milk-, dough-, and dent-stage kernels by approximately 100%, 60%, and 30% respectively. Aflatoxin levels increased with dose at dough and dent stages. Polar metabolites including alanine, proline, serine, valine, inositol, iso-leucine, sucrose, fructose, trehalose, turanose, mannitol, glycerol, arabitol, inositol, myo-inositol, and some intermediates of the tricarboxylic acid cycle (TCA—also known as citric acid or Krebs cycle) were important for dose classification. Important non-polar metabolites included arachidic, palmitic, stearic, 3,4-xylylic, and margaric acids. Aflatoxin levels correlated with levels of several polar metabolites. The strongest positive and negative correlations were with arabitol (R = 0.48) and turanose and (R = −0.53), respectively. Several metabolites were interconnected with the TCA; interconnections of the metabolites with the TCA cycle varied depending upon the grain maturity.Entities:
Keywords: Aspergillus parasiticus; Zea mays; aflatoxin; metabolite; metabolomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29735944 PMCID: PMC5983243 DOI: 10.3390/toxins10050187
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Figure 1Maize cobs at milk, dough, and dent stages of reproductive development.
Figure 2Grain colonisation (a) milk, (b) dough, and (c) dent kernels (i) control and (ii) inoculated.
Log aflatoxin concentrations in kernels within each of the grain maturity stages.
| Log AFT in Grains ± SD * | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dose | Milk | Dough | Dent |
| Control | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a |
| Low | 3.88 ± 0.34 b | 3.96 ± 0.44 b | 3.67 ± 0.45 b |
| Medium | 3.73 ± 0.59 b | 4.31 ± 0.34 c,∫ | 4.01 ± 0.33 c |
| High | 3.78 ± 0.21 b | 4.44 ± 0.38 c,∫ | 4.12 ± 0.27 c |
* Different superscripted letters (a, b, c) in the same column represent aflatoxin concentrations that are statistically different from one another. Log AFT values with ∫ indicate values that are statistical differences (p < 0.05) within the same row (dose). AFT = total aflatoxin concentrations; SD = standard deviation.
Log absolute aflatoxin levels in kernels within each of the grain maturity stages.
| Log Absol in Grains ± SD * | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dose | Milk | Dough | Dent |
| Control | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a |
| Low | 2.89 ± 0.34 b | 3.08 ± 0.41 b | 2.99 ± 0.45 b |
| Medium | 2.73 ± 0.59 b,∫ | 3.33 ± 0.35 c | 3.32 ± 0.33 c |
| High | 2.78 ± 0.21 b,∫ | 3.50 ± 0.40 c | 3.42 ± 0.27 c |
* Different superscripted letters (a, b, c) in the same column represent aflatoxin concentrations that are statistically different from one another. Log absolute aflatoxin levels (Log Absol) values with ∫ indicate values that are statistical differences (p < 0.05) within the same row (dose). SD = standard deviation.
Dose stage classification accuracy and error from stepwise discriminant analysis.
| Percentage Classified into Dose Group | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| From Dose | Control | Low | Medium | High | Error Counts for Dose |
| Control | 73% | 16% | 2% | 9% | 0.27 |
| Low | 7% | 89% | 4% | 0% | 0.11 |
| Medium | 9% | 2% | 89% | 0% | 0.11 |
| High | 2% | 0% | 2% | 96% | 0.04 |
Pearson’s correlations of log aflatoxins and identified compounds. GABA = gamma-aminobutyric acid.
| Compound | R | |
|---|---|---|
| 1,2-Propanediol | −0.46 | <0.0001 |
| Alanine | −0.41 | <0.0001 |
| Aminomalonic acid | −0.28 | 0.0010 |
| Arabitol or Xylitol | 0.48 | <0.0001 |
| Citric acid | 0.36 | <0.0001 |
| 0.12 | 0.1617 | |
| Erythronoic acid | −0.41 | <0.0001 |
| Fructose | −0.25 | <0.0030 |
| GABA | −0.39 | <0.0001 |
| Glyceric acid | −0.40 | <0.0001 |
| Glycerol | 0.41 | <0.0001 |
| Glycine | −0.31 | 0.0002 |
| Inositol | 0.45 | <0.0001 |
| Iso-leucine | −0.46 | <0.0001 |
| 0.35 | <0.0001 | |
| Malate | 0.18 | 0.0310 |
| Malonic acid | 0.17 | 0.0450 |
| Mannitol | −0.16 | 0.0520 |
| Myo-inositol | −0.47 | <0.0001 |
| Phosphoric acid | 0.21 | 0.0140 |
| Proline | −0.48 | <0.0001 |
| Serine | −0.42 | <0.0001 |
| Sucrose | −0.30 | 0.0003 |
| Succinate | 0.04 | 0.6800 |
| Threonine | −0.44 | <0.0001 |
| Trehalose | −0.49 | <0.0001 |
| Turanose | −0.53 | <0.0001 |
| Uracil | −0.39 | <0.0001 |
| Valine | −0.45 | <0.0001 |
| 3,4-dimethylbenzoic acid (xylylic acid) | −0.08 | 0.3702 |
| Pentadecanoic acid ( | 0.15 | 0.0800 |
| Hexadecanoic acid (palmitic acid) | −0.08 | 0.3491 |
| Octadecanoic acid (stearic acid) | 0.02 | 0.8282 |
| 11-icosenoic acid (gondoic acid) | −0.15 | 0.0705 |
| Icosanoic acid (arachidic acid). | −0.03 | 0.7195 |
Figure 3Cluster analysis of fungal dose in kernels using polar metabolite data at milk, dough, and dent stages of maturity. (C, L, M, and H represent control, low, medium, and high fungal doses). LD1 and LD2 are linear discriminant functions 1 and 2.
Figure 4Cluster analysis of fungal dose in kernels using non-polar metabolite data at milk, dough, and dent stages of maturity (C, L, M, and H represent control, low, medium, and high fungal doses). LD1 and LD2 are linear discriminant functions 1 and 2.
Figure 5Experimental design layout.