| Literature DB >> 29716581 |
Ardi Findyartini1, Nani Cahyani Sudarsono2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Fostering personal identity formation and professional development among undergraduate medical students is challenging. Based on situated learning, experiential learning and role-modelling frameworks, a six-week course was developed to remediate lapses in professionalism among undergraduate medical students. This study aims to explore the students' perceptions of their personal identity formation and professional development following completion of the course.Entities:
Keywords: Instructional design; Medicine; Professionalism; Remediation; Undergraduate
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29716581 PMCID: PMC5930750 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-018-1206-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Educ ISSN: 1472-6920 Impact factor: 2.463
Course description
| Week | Topics | Activities | Hours |
|---|---|---|---|
| I | The noble values of the medical profession | Group discussion with triggers | 4 |
| The Hippocratic oath and the values of the medical profession | Group discussion with triggers | 2 | |
| The history of medicine and the medical profession | Interactive lecture | 2 | |
| Professionalism and professional attributes | Interactive lecture | 2 | |
| Indonesia Medical Graduates Competence standards: Noble professionalism and self- reflective capabilities | Group discussion with triggers | 2 | |
| Individual learning on related topics | 6 | ||
|
| |||
| II | Role modelling and its role in professional development | Group discussion with triggers | 2 |
| The noble values of the medical profession and FMUI’s values: Implementation in daily practice | Group discussion with triggers | 4 | |
| The noble values of the medical profession and FMUI’s values: Reflections | Group discussion with triggers | 2 | |
| Individual learning and reflections | 20 | ||
|
| |||
| III | The noble values of the medical profession and FMUI’s values: Reflections on student organisation activities | Group discussion with triggers | 2 |
| Development of field-project proposals | Group work (two students in each group) | 15 | |
| Field-project proposal | Presentation and feedback | 6 | |
| Orientation on role-model shadowing activities | Interactive lecture | 1 | |
|
| |||
| IV | Role-model shadowing | (By appointment) | 8 |
| Field work | 17 | ||
| Progress report | Presentation and feedback | 4 | |
|
| |||
| V | Role-model shadowing | (By appointment) | 8 |
| Field work | 8 | ||
| Feedback | Discussion and roleplay | 4 | |
|
| |||
| VI | Field report completion | Group work | 12 |
| Portfolio completion | Individual work | 12 | |
| Final report | Presentation and feedback | 6 | |
|
| |||
Characteristics of the informants
| No. | Coded initials | Year of study | Gender |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AA | 3 | Male |
| 2 | BB | 3 | Male |
| 3 | CC | 3 | Female |
| 4 | DD | 2 | Female |
| 5 | EE | 2 | Female |
| 6 | FF | 1 | Male |
| 7 | GG | 1 | Male |
| 8 | HH | 1 | Female |
| 9 | II | 1 | Female |
| 10 | JJ | 1 | Male |
| 11 | KK | 3 | Female |
| 12 | LL | 3 | Female |
| 13 | MM | 3 | Female |
| 14 | NN | 3 | Female |