Literature DB >> 14985199

Unprofessional behavior in medical school is associated with subsequent disciplinary action by a state medical board.

Maxine A Papadakis1, Carol S Hodgson, Arianne Teherani, Neal D Kohatsu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if medical students who demonstrate unprofessional behavior in medical school are more likely to have subsequent state board disciplinary action.
METHOD: A case-control study was conducted of all University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine graduates disciplined by the Medical Board of California from 1990-2000 (68). Control graduates (196) were matched by medical school graduation year and specialty choice. Predictor variables were male gender, undergraduate grade point average, Medical College Admission Test scores, medical school grades, National Board of Medical Examiner Part 1 scores, and negative excerpts describing unprofessional behavior from course evaluation forms, dean's letter of recommendation for residencies, and administrative correspondence. Negative excerpts were scored for severity (Good/Trace versus Concern/Problem/Extreme). The outcome variable was state board disciplinary action.
RESULTS: The alumni graduated between 1943 and 1989. Ninety-five percent of the disciplinary actions were for deficiencies in professionalism. The prevalence of Concern/Problem/Extreme excerpts in the cases was 38% and 19% in controls. Logistic regression analysis showed that disciplined physicians were more likely to have Concern/Problem/Extreme excerpts in their medical school file (odds ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-4.02; p =.02). The remaining variables were not associated with disciplinary action.
CONCLUSION: Problematic behavior in medical school is associated with subsequent disciplinary action by a state medical board. Professionalism is an essential competency that must be demonstrated for a student to graduate from medical school.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14985199     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200403000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  87 in total

1.  Medical students' views on peer assessment of professionalism.

Authors:  Louise Arnold; Carolyn K Shue; Barbara Kritt; Shiphra Ginsburg; David T Stern
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Ensuring medical students are "fit for purpose".

Authors:  Val Wass
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-10-08

3.  Identifying medical students likely to exhibit poor professionalism and knowledge during internship.

Authors:  David L Greenburg; Steven J Durning; Daniel L Cohen; David Cruess; Jeffrey L Jackson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2007-10-20       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Professionalism and medicine.

Authors:  C Ronald MacKenzie
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2007-09

5.  Dishonesty in medicine revisited.

Authors:  Herbert L Fred
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2008

6.  Describing Failure in a Clinical Clerkship: Implications for Identification, Assessment and Remediation for Struggling Learners.

Authors:  L James Nixon; Sophia P Gladding; Briar L Duffy
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Selection criteria for internal medicine residency applicants and professionalism ratings during internship.

Authors:  Michael W Cullen; Darcy A Reed; Andrew J Halvorsen; Christopher M Wittich; Lisa M Baumann Kreuziger; Mira T Keddis; Furman S McDonald; Thomas J Beckman
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 7.616

8.  Medical education: Beware the hidden curriculum.

Authors:  Sally C Mahood
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.275

9.  What Does It Mean for a Case to be 'Local'?: the Importance of Local Relevance and Resonance for Bioethics Education in the Asia-Pacific Region.

Authors:  Sara M Bergstresser; Kulsoom Ghias; Stuart Lane; Wee-Ming Lau; Isabel S S Hwang; Olivia M Y Ngan; Robert L Klitzman; Ho Keung Ng
Journal:  Asian Bioeth Rev       Date:  2020-05-30

10.  The use of professionalism scenarios in the medical school interview process: faculty and interviewee perceptions.

Authors:  James Kleshinski; Constance Shriner; Sadik A Khuder
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2008-02-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.