Literature DB >> 16728812

Comparing millennial and generation X medical students at one medical school.

Nicole J Borges1, R Stephen Manuel, Carol L Elam, Bonnie J Jones.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Two main generational cohorts comprising students enrolled in medical schools today are Generation Xers (born 1965-1980) and Millennial students (born 1981-1999). A subset is Cuspars (born 1975-1980), who share traits with both generations. Population theorists ascribe different personal characteristics, attitudes, and preferences to each group. The authors examined whether selected characteristics describing Generation X and Millennial students were quantifiable using a personality measure. Differences among Generation X, Millennial, and Cuspar medical students were investigated.
METHOD: Eight hundred and nine medical students (399 females and 410 males) who matriculated between 1989-94 and 2001-04 at the Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine completed the 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire (16PF). Differences in responses to the 16PF among the three generations were analyzed using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA).
RESULTS: Analyses showed significant differences for Generation X versus Millennial students on 10 of the 16 personality factors. Millennial students scored significantly higher than Generation X students on factors including Rule-Consciousness, Emotional Stability, and Perfectionism; Generation X students scored higher than Millennials on Self-Reliance. Millennials also were significantly different from Generation Xers on several other factors. Significant differences were noted among Cuspars, Generation Xers, and Millennials.
CONCLUSIONS: The 16PF is a useful tool to examine differences among these groups and to help understand the factors that constitute their personalities. Given differences among the generational groups, the authors forecast possible educational implications for medical school academic affairs and student services, and suggest areas for future research.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16728812     DOI: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000225222.38078.47

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  26 in total

1.  Training the Millennial learner through experiential evolutionary scaffolding: implications for clinical supervision in graduate education programs.

Authors:  Vickie L Venne; Darrell Coleman
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Generational and gender perspectives on career flexibility: ensuring the faculty workforce of the future.

Authors:  Lydia Pleotis Howell; Laurel A Beckett; Jasmine Nettiksimmons; Amparo C Villablanca
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  An environmental scan on the status of critical thinking and problem solving skills in colleges/schools of pharmacy: report of the 2009-2010 academic affairs standing committee.

Authors:  Gary M Oderda; Robin M Zavod; Jean T Carter; Johnnie L Early; Pamela U Joyner; Harold Kirschenbaum; Eric J Mack; Andrew P Traynor; Cecilia M Plaza
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  The challenges and opportunities of teaching "generation y".

Authors:  Jodie Eckleberry-Hunt; Jennifer Tucciarone
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2011-12

5.  CORR insights: Orthopaedic residency applications increase after implementation of 80-hour workweek.

Authors:  Susan A Scherl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02-02       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Does gender moderate medical students' assessments of unprofessional behavior?

Authors:  Terry D Stratton; Rosemarie L Conigliaro
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  CORR Insights®: What factors influence applicants' rankings of orthopaedic surgery residency programs in the National Resident Matching Program?

Authors:  Susan A Scherl
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Evaluation of three different methods of distance learning for postgraduate diagnostic imaging education: A pilot study.

Authors:  Jean-Nicolas Poirier; Jeffrey R Cooley; Michelle Wessely; Gary M Guebert; Kristina Petrocco-Napuli
Journal:  J Chiropr Educ       Date:  2014-04-29

9.  Improving knowledge, awareness, and use of flexible career policies through an accelerator intervention at the University of California, Davis, School of Medicine.

Authors:  Amparo C Villablanca; Laurel Beckett; Jasmine Nettiksimmons; Lydia P Howell
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.893

10.  Evaluation of Computer-aided Strategies for Teaching Medical Students Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnostic Skills.

Authors:  Lawrence S Amesse; Ealena Callendar; Teresa Pfaff-Amesse; Janice Duke; William N P Herbert
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2008-09-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.