Literature DB >> 21735557

Demystifying the Millennial student: a reassessment in measures of character and engagement in professional education.

Camille DiLullo1, Patricia McGee, Richard M Kriebel.   

Abstract

The characteristic profile of Millennial Generation students, driving many educational reforms, can be challenged by research in a number of fields including cognition, learning style, neurology, and psychology. This evidence suggests that the current aggregate view of the Millennial student may be less than accurate. Statistics show that Millennial students are considerably diverse in backgrounds, personalities, and learning styles. Data are presented regarding technological predilection, multitasking, reading, critical thinking, professional behaviors, and learning styles, which indicate that students in the Millennial Generation may not be as homogenous in fundamental learning strategies and attitudes as is regularly proposed. Although their common character traits have implications for instruction, no available evidence demonstrates that these traits impact their fundamental process of learning. Many curricular strategies have been implemented to address alleged changes in the manner by which Millennial students learn. None has clearly shown superior outcomes in academic accomplishments or developing expertise for graduating students and concerns persist related to the successful engagement of Millennial students in the process of learning. Four factors for consideration in general curricular design are proposed to address student engagement and optimal knowledge acquisition for 21st century learners.
Copyright © 2011 American Association of Anatomists.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21735557     DOI: 10.1002/ase.240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Sci Educ        ISSN: 1935-9772            Impact factor:   5.958


  22 in total

1.  The Importance of Authentic Leadership to all Generations Represented within Academic Pharmacy.

Authors:  Nicole R Pinelli; Julie M Sease; Kamala Nola; Jeffrey A Kyle; Seth D Heldenbrand; Scott R Penzak; Diane B Ginsburg
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Digital and Social Media in Anatomy Education.

Authors:  Catherine M Hennessy; Claire F Smith
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2020       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Modeling Doctor of Pharmacy Students' Stress, Satisfaction, and Professionalism Over Time.

Authors:  Casey Tak; Craig Henchey; Michael Feehan; Mark A Munger
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Assessing the Impact of Interactive Educational Videos and Screencasts Within Pre-clinical Microanatomy and Medical Physiology Teaching.

Authors:  Alistair Robson; Yarrow Scantling-Birch; Stuart Morton; Deepika Anbu; Scott Border
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Evaluating the Anatomage Table Compared to Cadaveric Dissection as a Learning Modality for Gross Anatomy.

Authors:  Guy Baratz; Amy L Wilson-Delfosse; Bryan M Singelyn; Kevin C Allan; Gabrielle E Rieth; Rubina Ratnaparkhi; Brenden P Jenks; Caitlin Carlton; Barbara K Freeman; Susanne Wish-Baratz
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2019-03-26

6.  Self-reported Learning and Study Strategies in First and Second Year Medical Students.

Authors:  Marissa Roffler; Ryan Sheehy
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2022-03-18

7.  A new paradigm is needed for medical education in the mid-twenty-first century and beyond: are we ready?

Authors:  Dan E Benor
Journal:  Rambam Maimonides Med J       Date:  2014-07-25

8.  The association between academic engagement and achievement in health sciences students.

Authors:  Maria J Casuso-Holgado; Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas; Noelia Moreno-Morales; Maria T Labajos-Manzanares; Francisco J Barón-López; Manuel Vega-Cuesta
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Health knowledge among the millennial generation.

Authors:  Tom Lloyd; Michele L Shaffer; Stetter Christy; Mark D Widome; John Repke; Michael R Weitekamp; Paul J Eslinger; Sandra S Bargainnier; Ian M Paul
Journal:  J Public Health Res       Date:  2013-07-22

10.  E-learning for Critical Thinking: Using Nominal Focus Group Method to Inform Software Content and Design.

Authors:  Steve Parker; Lidia Mayner; David Michael Gillham
Journal:  Nurs Midwifery Stud       Date:  2015-12-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.