Literature DB >> 29607162

Early and mid-term haemodynamic performance and clinical outcomes of St. Jude Medical Trifecta™ valve.

Renata Raimundo1, Soraia Moreira1, Francisca Saraiva1, Rui J Cerqueira1,2, Pedro Teixeira1, Elson Salgueiro1,2, André Lourenço1,3, Mário J Amorim1,2, Jorge Almeida1,2, Paulo Pinho1,2, Adelino F Leite-Moreira1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: New models of aortic bioprostheses have proven excellent early haemodynamic profile, but their mid and long-term performance warrants further systematic assessment. The aim of this study is to report clinical and haemodynamic performance of St. Jude Medical Trifecta bioprosthesis during 5 years of implantation.
METHODS: We performed a single centre, retrospective, observational and descriptive study including all 556 individuals who underwent aortic valve replacement (AVR) with the Trifecta bioprosthesis (between July of 2011 and June of 2016). Survival and re-intervention were censored in February 2017. Postoperative ambulatory echocardiographic data was available for 490 patients. A complete clinical follow-up was available in 463 individuals (mean follow-up time, 27±17 months).
RESULTS: In our sample the mean age was 73±9 years, 57.6% were male and median European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) II was 2.9 (interquartile range, 1.6-5.8). There were 301 (54.1%) combined procedures, mostly coronary artery bypass grafting in 170 (30.6%). Overall 30-days mortality was 5.4% (n=30) and cumulative survival at 5-years was 72.3%. There were 23 (4.3%) permanent pacemaker implantations. During follow-up, 5 (0.9%) patients presented non-structural valve dysfunction (NSVD) and 4 (0.8%) underwent reoperation due to prosthesis endocarditis. At the first ambulatory evaluation transvalvular mean gradient and effective orifice area (EOA) were 10.9±4.1 mmHg and 2.0±0.5 cm2, respectively. Severe patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) was observed in 5 (1.1%) individuals and moderate in 52 (11.3%).
CONCLUSIONS: In a "real-world" clinical setting, our findings support the good overall mid-term haemodynamic and safety profile of the Trifecta bioprosthesis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic valve; bioprosthesis; heart valve diseases

Year:  2018        PMID: 29607162      PMCID: PMC5864586          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.01.15

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  31 in total

Review 1.  Current status on stentless aortic bioprosthesis: a clinical and experimental perspective.

Authors:  Jonas Amstrup Funder
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  St Jude Medical Trifecta aortic prosthesis: Considerations for implantation.

Authors:  W R Eric Jamieson
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch after "high-risk" aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Popma; Kamal Khabbaz
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Clinical and hemodynamic outcomes after aortic valve replacement with stented and stentless pericardial xenografts: a propensity-matched analysis.

Authors:  Augusto D'Onofrio; Giovanni Domenico Cresce; Irene Bolgan; Paolo Magagna; Caterina Piccin; Stefano Auriemma; Alessandro Fabbri
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2011-05

5.  Mid-term durability of the Trifecta bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Amedeo Anselmi; Vito Giovanni Ruggieri; Bernard Lelong; Erwan Flecher; Hervé Corbineau; Thierry Langanay; Jean-Philippe Verhoye; Alain Leguerrier
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  The influence of patient-prosthesis mismatch on in-hospital complications and early mortality after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Shahab Nozohoor; Johan Nilsson; Carsten Lührs; Anders Roijer; Johan Sjögren
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2007-09

7.  Effect of aortic pericardial valve choice on outcomes and left ventricular mass regression in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy.

Authors:  Fraser D Rubens; Yen-Yen Gee; Janet M C Ngu; Li Chen; Ian G Burwash
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-06-18       Impact factor: 5.209

Review 8.  Natural History, Diagnostic Approaches, and Therapeutic Strategies for Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Philippe Généreux; Gregg W Stone; Patrick T O'Gara; Guillaume Marquis-Gravel; Björn Redfors; Gennaro Giustino; Philippe Pibarot; Jeroen J Bax; Robert O Bonow; Martin B Leon
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-02       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Clinical predictors of prosthesis-patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Luis M Astudillo; Orlando Santana; Pablo A Urbandt; Alexandre M Benjo; Lior U Elkayam; Francisco O Nascimento; Gervasio A Lamas; Joseph Lamelas
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.365

10.  St. Jude Medical Trifecta aortic valve: results from a prospective regional multicentre registry.

Authors:  Giovanni Mariscalco; Silvia Mariani; Samuele Bichi; Andrea Biondi; Andrea Blasio; Paolo Borsani; Fabrizio Corti; Benedetta De Chiara; Riccardo Gherli; Cristian Leva; Claudio Francesco Russo; Giordano Tasca; Paolo Vanelli; Ottavio Alfieri; Carlo Antona; Germano Di Credico; Giampiero Esposito; Amando Gamba; Luigi Martinelli; Lorenzo Menicanti; Giovanni Paolini; Cesare Beghi
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 1.637

View more
  1 in total

1.  Clinical outcome and hemodynamic performance of St. Jude Trifecta aortic prosthesis: short-term follow-up and risk factors analysis.

Authors:  Paolo Nardi; Calogera Pisano; Fabio Bertoldo; Sara Rita Vacirca; Monica Greci; Carlo Bassano; Antonio Scafuri; Antonio Pellegrino; Giovanni Ruvolo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.