Literature DB >> 27697360

Mid-term durability of the Trifecta bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement.

Amedeo Anselmi1, Vito Giovanni Ruggieri2, Bernard Lelong2, Erwan Flecher2, Hervé Corbineau2, Thierry Langanay2, Jean-Philippe Verhoye2, Alain Leguerrier2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To clarify the mid-term durability of the Trifecta bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement (AVR).
METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the prospectively collected data of 824 consecutive implants of the Trifecta valve at a single institution. A 100% complete follow-up was available (average duration, 2.2 ± 1.3 years; range, 0.03-6.9 years; 1747.6 patient-years). Echocardiography data at discharge were recorded prospectively.
RESULTS: Operative mortality was 3.8%; 2.7% in patients receiving isolated AVR. There were 5 valve-related early reoperations, including 1 for infective prosthetic endocarditis and 4 for nonstructural valve dysfunction. The global rate of severe patient-prosthesis mismatch was 1.26%. Overall 5-year survival was 74.9%, and freedom from valve-related death was 97.8%. The majority of deaths attributed to the valve were due to unknown causes. We observed 6 SVD events at 3.4 ± 1.6 years after surgery. At 5 years, the actuarial freedom from SVD was 98% ± 0.9% (n = 6), freedom from reintervention for SVD was 98% ± 0.9% (n = 5, including 2 transcatheter valve-in-valve), and freedom from open reoperation for SVD was 98.9% ± 0.6%. The 5-year freedom from prosthetic endocarditis was 97.7% ± 0.7% (n = 12, 6 requiring reoperation). There was 1 case of late NSVD (5-year freedom, 99.8% ± 0.2%). Freedom from hemorrhagic events was 98.6% ± 0.5% (86% occurring in patients on anticoagulants); there were no thromboembolic events at follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: The Trifecta bioprosthesis is a reliable device for AVR. We confirm excellent immediate hemodynamic properties and a very low rate of patient-prosthesis mismatch. The absolute number of SVD cases observed remains limited; nevertheless, their timing, pathological characteristics, and clinical presentation mandate continued follow-up.
Copyright © 2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic valve replacement; durability; outcomes; trifecta

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27697360     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.07.080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  11 in total

Review 1.  The Use of Biological Heart Valves.

Authors:  Sami Kueri; Fabian A Kari; Rafael Ayala Fuentes; Hans-Hinrich Sievers; Friedhelm Beyersdorf; Wolfgang Bothe
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Clinical outcome and hemodynamic performance of St. Jude Trifecta aortic prosthesis: short-term follow-up and risk factors analysis.

Authors:  Paolo Nardi; Calogera Pisano; Fabio Bertoldo; Sara Rita Vacirca; Monica Greci; Carlo Bassano; Antonio Scafuri; Antonio Pellegrino; Giovanni Ruvolo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Prosthetic cardiac valves: history and review of cardiac prostheses clinically available in Japan.

Authors:  Eiki Tayama; Kosuke Saku; Tomoyuki Anegawa; Atsunobu Oryoji; Shinya Negoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2021-08-25       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Mid-term clinical and health-related quality of life outcomes for the Trifecta bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Biswarup Purkayastha; Md Wasim Khan; Atanu Saha; Debasis Das; Lalit Kapoor; Mrinalendu Das; Pradeep Narayan
Journal:  Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2021-04-27

5.  Mid-term clinical and haemodynamic results after aortic valve replacement with the Trifecta bioprosthesis.

Authors:  Augustijn Mortelé; Alexander Dereu; Thierry Bové; Katrien François
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-08-11

6.  Impact of Non-Valvular Non-Coronary Concomitant Procedures on Outcomes of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Intermediate Risk Patients.

Authors:  Fanar Mourad; Ali Haddad; Janine Nowak; Mohamed Elbarraki; Yacine Elhmidi; Marinela Jasarevic; Philipp Marx; Ender Demircioglu; Daniel Wendt; Matthias Thielmann; Bastian Schmack; Arjang Ruhparwar; Sharaf-Eldin Shehada
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-11-28       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Early and mid-term haemodynamic performance and clinical outcomes of St. Jude Medical Trifecta™ valve.

Authors:  Renata Raimundo; Soraia Moreira; Francisca Saraiva; Rui J Cerqueira; Pedro Teixeira; Elson Salgueiro; André Lourenço; Mário J Amorim; Jorge Almeida; Paulo Pinho; Adelino F Leite-Moreira
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.895

8.  Antithrombotic Strategies After Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Joel N Papak; Joseph C Chiovaro; North Noelck; Laura D Healy; Michele Freeman; Jacquelyn A Quin; Robin Paynter; Allison Low; Karli Kondo; Owen J T McCarty; Devan Kansagara
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Structural valve deterioration after aortic valve replacement with the Trifecta valve.

Authors:  Paul Werner; Jasmin Gritsch; Sabine Scherzer; Christoph Gross; Marco Russo; Iuliana Coti; Alfred Kocher; Guenther Laufer; Martin Andreas
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-01-01

10.  Commentary: Trifecta valve: Does a word of caution prevail?

Authors:  Ko Bando
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2020-11-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.