Literature DB >> 31179089

Clinical outcome and hemodynamic performance of St. Jude Trifecta aortic prosthesis: short-term follow-up and risk factors analysis.

Paolo Nardi1, Calogera Pisano1, Fabio Bertoldo1, Sara Rita Vacirca1, Monica Greci1, Carlo Bassano1, Antonio Scafuri1, Antonio Pellegrino1, Giovanni Ruvolo1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We retrospectively analysed the short-term outcome of the third-generation St. Jude Trifecta aortic prosthesis.
METHODS: Between December 2014 and December 2017, 177 patients (mean age 75.1±6.8 years, 95 males, 82 females) underwent aortic valve replacement with a St. Jude Trifecta aortic prosthesis and were followed up to 27±9 months. Preoperatively 92 patients (52.0%) were in NYHA class III-IV, EuroSCORE II was 3.2%±2.1%.
RESULTS: Trifecta sizes implanted were 19 mm (n=46) (26%), 21 mm (n=69) (39%), 23 mm (n=46) (26%), 25 mm (n=16) (9%). Concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting was performed in 60 patients (34.0%). Operative mortality was 3.4% (1.7% for isolated aortic valve replacement versus 6.7% for combined aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass grafting) (P=0.084). The only independent predictor of mortality was the need for the mechanical ventilation greater than 24 hours (P=0.037); recently occurring myocardial infarction was risk factor for mortality at the univariate analysis only (P=0.013). Three-year survival was 84%±6%, freedom from cardiac death 98%±1%, freedom from prosthetic endocarditis 97%±1%. No thromboembolisms or structural valve degeneration were observed. Patient-prosthesis mismatch (PPM) was absent in 126 patients (71.2%), mild-to-moderate in 32 (18.1%), moderate in 19 (10.7%), severe in no any patient. Follow-up echocardiography showed an average mean and peak trans-aortic valve gradients reduction more than 70% in comparison with preoperative value (P<0.0001), and a significant regression of left ventricular hypertrophy (P<0.0001). Moderate PPM did not negatively affect survival. Concomitant severe coronary artery disease was found as an independent predictor of reduced survival (72%±12% versus 86%±6%) (P=0.015).
CONCLUSIONS: Trifecta aortic prosthesis seems to provide very favourable clinical outcome and hemodynamic performance. At three years, survival was negatively affected by severe coronary artery disease detected at the time of operation. During short-term follow-up, no early structural valve degeneration was been observed. Due to low incidence of PPM and low peak and mean trans-prosthetic aortic valve gradients, third generation Trifecta aortic prosthesis should be considered as one of the best options in the setting of the aortic valve replacement surgery. However, a long-term follow-up is mandatory to confirm the early promising data.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic valve replacement; aortic bio-prosthesis

Year:  2019        PMID: 31179089      PMCID: PMC6531685          DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2019.03.41

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  51 in total

1.  Risk factors and outcome in European cardiac surgery: analysis of the EuroSCORE multinational database of 19030 patients.

Authors:  F Roques; S A Nashef; P Michel; E Gauducheau; C de Vincentiis; E Baudet; J Cortina; M David; A Faichney; F Gabrielle; E Gams; A Harjula; M T Jones; P P Pintor; R Salamon; L Thulin
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.191

2.  Recommendations for evaluation of the severity of native valvular regurgitation with two-dimensional and Doppler echocardiography.

Authors:  William A Zoghbi; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Elyse Foster; Paul A Grayburn; Carol D Kraft; Robert A Levine; Petros Nihoyannopoulos; Catherine M Otto; Miguel A Quinones; Harry Rakowski; William J Stewart; Alan Waggoner; Neil J Weissman
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.251

Review 3.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch: definition, clinical impact, and prevention.

Authors:  P Pibarot; J G Dumesnil
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-10-26       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 4.  Recommendations for chamber quantification.

Authors:  Roberto M Lang; Michelle Bierig; Richard B Devereux; Frank A Flachskampf; Elyse Foster; Patricia A Pellikka; Michael H Picard; Mary J Roman; James Seward; Jack Shanewise; Scott Solomon; Kirk T Spencer; Martin St John Sutton; William Stewart
Journal:  Eur J Echocardiogr       Date:  2006-02-02

5.  Guidelines for reporting mortality and morbidity after cardiac valve interventions.

Authors:  Cary W Akins; D Craig Miller; Marko I Turina; Nicholas T Kouchoukos; Eugene H Blackstone; Gary L Grunkemeier; Johanna J M Takkenberg; Tirone E David; Eric G Butchart; David H Adams; David M Shahian; Siegfried Hagl; John E Mayer; Bruce W Lytle
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on cardiac events and midterm mortality after aortic valve replacement in patients with pure aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Giordano Tasca; Zen Mhagna; Silvano Perotti; Pietro Berra Centurini; Tony Sabatini; Andrea Amaducci; Federico Brunelli; Marco Cirillo; Margherita Dalla Tomba; Eugenio Quaini; Eugenio Quiani; Giovanni Troise; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-01-09       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  V Rao; W R Jamieson; J Ivanov; S Armstrong; T E David
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-11-07       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  POINT: Prosthesis-patient mismatch does not affect survival for patients greater than 70 years of age undergoing bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Marc R Moon; Jennifer S Lawton; Nader Moazami; Nabil A Munfakh; Michael K Pasque; Ralph J Damiano
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Late incidence and predictors of persistent or recurrent heart failure in patients with aortic prosthetic valves.

Authors:  Marc Ruel; Fraser D Rubens; Roy G Masters; Andrew L Pipe; Pierre Bédard; Paul J Hendry; B Khanh Lam; Ian G Burwash; William G Goldstein; Maurice P Brais; Wilbert J Keon; Thierry G Mesana
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Aortic annular enlargement during aortic valve replacement: improving results with time.

Authors:  Mark D Peterson; Michael A Borger; Christopher M Feindel; Tirone E David
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.330

View more
  2 in total

1.  Early Hemodynamics after Aortic Valve Replacement.

Authors:  Serik Aitaliyev; Egle Rumbinaitė; Karolina Mėlinytė-Ankudavičė; Rokas Nekrošius; Vytenis Keturakis; Rimantas Benetis
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 2.430

2.  Early outcomes of patient-prosthesis mismatch following aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Serik Aitaliyev; Egle Rumbinaitė; Karolina Mėlinytė-Ankudavičė; Rokas Nekrošius; Vytenis Keturakis; Rimantas Benetis
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2021-06-03       Impact factor: 1.581

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.