Literature DB >> 30404523

Evanescent waves in simulated ear canals: Experimental demonstration and method for compensation.

Jonathan H Siegel1, Kren Rahbek Nørgaard2, Stephen T Neely3.   

Abstract

Evanescent waves emerge from a small sound source that radiates into a waveguide with a larger cross-sectional area, but unlike planar waves, do not propagate far from the source. Evanescent waves thus contaminate in-ear calibration of acoustic stimuli. Measurements with an otoacoustic-emission (OAE) probe inserted at the entrance of long tubes of various diameters show a decline in the evanescent wave with distance from the source when advancing a probe tube through the OAE probe and into the long tube. The amplitude of the evanescent pressure increases with frequency and depends strongly on the diameter of the long tube. Modifying the shape of the aperture of the probe's sound source, thus effectively enlarging its diameter and redirecting acoustic flow, greatly reduced evanescent waves. The reduction in evanescent-wave pressure was observed in calibration cavities used to determine the Thévenin-equivalent source pressure and impedance of the probe. Errors in source calibrations were considerably larger in the unmodified configuration. An alternative method is proposed for calculation of acoustic source parameters that models the evanescent-wave pressure and reduces its influence on the calculation. This reduction greatly improves the quality of source calibrations, which should improve the accuracy of ear-canal impedance measurements and related quantities.

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30404523      PMCID: PMC6185868          DOI: 10.1121/1.5058683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  A noninvasive method for estimating acoustic admittance at the tympanic membrane.

Authors:  G T Huang; J J Rosowski; S Puria; W T Peake
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Further assessment of forward pressure level for in situ calibration.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Shawn S Goodman; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  How the cross-sectional discontinuity between ear canal and probe affects the ear canal length estimation.

Authors:  Makram Zebian; Johannes Hensel; Thomas Fedtke
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Method to measure acoustic impedance and reflection coefficient.

Authors:  D H Keefe; R Ling; J C Bulen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Comparison of in-situ calibration methods for quantifying input to the middle ear.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Ryan W McCreery; Stephen T Neely; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Comparison of nine methods to estimate ear-canal stimulus levels.

Authors:  Natalie N Souza; Sumitrajit Dhar; Stephen T Neely; Jonathan H Siegel
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Incorporating evanescent modes and flow losses into reference impedances in acoustic Thévenin calibration.

Authors:  Kren Rahbek Nørgaard; Efren Fernandez-Grande; Søren Laugesen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Compensating for evanescent modes and estimating characteristic impedance in waveguide acoustic impedance measurements.

Authors:  Kren Rahbek Nørgaard; Efren Fernandez-Grande; Søren Laugesen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Measurement of acoustic impedance and reflectance in the human ear canal.

Authors:  S E Voss; J B Allen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Measurement of the acoustic input immittance of the human ear.

Authors:  W M Rabinowitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  4 in total

1.  Age Effects on Cochlear Reflectance in Adults.

Authors:  Sara E Fultz; Kenneth I Vaden; Daniel M Rasetshwane; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Effects of Forward- and Emitted-Pressure Calibrations on the Variability of Otoacoustic Emission Measurements Across Repeated Probe Fits.

Authors:  Tom Maxim; Christopher A Shera; Karolina K Charaziak; Carolina Abdala
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Nov/Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  A comparison of ear-canal-reflectance measurement methods in an ear simulator.

Authors:  Kren Rahbek Nørgaard; Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  On the calculation of reflectance in non-uniform ear canals.

Authors:  Kren Rahbek Nørgaard; Karolina K Charaziak; Christopher A Shera
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 1.840

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.