Literature DB >> 8120248

Measurement of acoustic impedance and reflectance in the human ear canal.

S E Voss1, J B Allen.   

Abstract

The pressure reflectance R (omega) is the transfer function which may be defined for a linear one-port network by the ratio of the reflected complex pressure divided by the incident complex pressure. The reflectance is a function that is closely related to the impedance of the 1-port. The energy reflectance R (omega) is defined as magnitude of [R]2. It represents the ratio of reflected to incident energy. In the human ear canal the energy reflectance is important because it is a measure of the inefficiency of the middle ear and cochlea, and because of the insight provided by its simple frequency domain interpretation. One may characterize the ear canal impedance by use of the pressure reflectance and its magnitude, sidestepping the difficult problems of (a) the unknown canal length from the measurement point to the eardrum, (b) the complicated geometry of the drum, and (c) the cross-sectional area changes in the canal as a function of distance. Reported here are acoustic impedance measurements, looking into the ear canal, measured on ten young adults with normal hearing (ages 18-24). The measurement point in the canal was approximately 0.85 cm from the entrance of the canal. From these measurements, the pressure reflectance in the canal is computed and impedance and reflectance measurements from 0.1 to 15.0 kHz are compared among ears. The average reflectance and the standard deviation of the reflectance for the ten subjects have been determined. The impedance and reflectance of two common ear simulators, the Brüel & Kjaer 4157 and the Industrial Research Products DB-100 (Zwislocki) coupler are also measured and compared to the average human measurements. All measurements are made using controls that assure a uniform accuracy in the acoustic calibration across subjects. This is done by the use of two standard acoustic resistors whose impedances are known. From the experimental results, it is concluded that there is significant subject variability in the magnitude of the reflectance for the ten ear canals. This variability is believed to be due to cochlear and middle ear impedance differences. An attempt was made at modeling the reflectance but, as discussed in the paper, several problems presently stand in the way of these models. Such models would be useful for acoustic virtual-reality systems and for active noise control earphones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8120248     DOI: 10.1121/1.408329

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  54 in total

Review 1.  [Sound and velocity DPOAEs : Technology, methodology and perspectives].

Authors:  E Dalhoff; A Vetesník; D Turcanu; A W Gummer
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Non-invasive estimation of middle-ear input impedance and efficiency.

Authors:  James D Lewis; Stephen T Neely
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Cochlear Reflectance and Otoacoustic Emission Predictions of Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Stephen T Neely; Sara E Fultz; Judy G Kopun; Natalie M Lenzen; Daniel M Rasetshwane
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  Sound pressure distribution and power flow within the gerbil ear canal from 100 Hz to 80 kHz.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Elizabeth S Olson; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Wideband absorbance tympanometry using pressure sweeps: system development and results on adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Yi-Wen Liu; Chris A Sanford; John C Ellison; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Michael P Gorga; Douglas H Keefe
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  An analysis of the acoustic input impedance of the ear.

Authors:  Robert H Withnell; Lauren E Gowdy
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-08-06

7.  Chinchilla middle-ear admittance and sound power: high-frequency estimates and effects of inner-ear modifications.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Investigation of bacterial biofilm in the human middle ear using optical coherence tomography and acoustic measurements.

Authors:  Cac T Nguyen; Sarah R Robinson; Woonggyu Jung; Michael A Novak; Stephen A Boppart; Jont B Allen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Motion of the tympanic membrane after cartilage tympanoplasty determined by stroboscopic holography.

Authors:  Antti A Aarnisalo; Jeffrey T Cheng; Michael E Ravicz; Cosme Furlong; Saumil N Merchant; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Use of forward pressure level to minimize the influence of acoustic standing waves during probe-microphone hearing-aid verification.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Andrea Pittman; James Lewis; Stephen T Neely; Patricia G Stelmachowicz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.