Literature DB >> 29594181

Predicting malignant nodules by fusing deep features with classical radiomics features.

Rahul Paul1, Samuel H Hawkins1, Matthew B Schabath2, Robert J Gillies3, Lawrence O Hall1, Dmitry B Goldgof1.   

Abstract

Lung cancer has a high incidence and mortality rate. Early detection and diagnosis of lung cancers is best achieved with low-dose computed tomography (CT). Classical radiomics features extracted from lung CT images have been shown as able to predict cancer incidence and prognosis. With the advancement of deep learning and convolutional neural networks (CNNs), deep features can be identified to analyze lung CTs for prognosis prediction and diagnosis. Due to a limited number of available images in the medical field, the transfer learning concept can be helpful. Using subsets of participants from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST), we utilized a transfer learning approach to differentiate lung cancer nodules versus positive controls. We experimented with three different pretrained CNNs for extracting deep features and used five different classifiers. Experiments were also conducted with deep features from different color channels of a pretrained CNN. Selected deep features were combined with radiomics features. A CNN was designed and trained. Combinations of features from pretrained, CNNs trained on NLST data, and classical radiomics were used to build classifiers. The best accuracy (76.79%) was obtained using feature combinations. An area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87 was obtained using a CNN trained on an augmented NLST data cohort.

Entities:  

Keywords:  National Lung Screening Trial; convolutional neural network; deep features; nonsmall cell lung cancer; radiomics; transfer learning

Year:  2018        PMID: 29594181      PMCID: PMC5862127          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.5.1.011021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  11 in total

1.  Learning to forget: continual prediction with LSTM.

Authors:  F A Gers; J Schmidhuber; F Cummins
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.026

Review 2.  Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology: the state of the art.

Authors:  J A Hanley
Journal:  Crit Rev Diagn Imaging       Date:  1989

Review 3.  Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve Analysis for Medical Diagnostic Test Evaluation.

Authors:  Karimollah Hajian-Tilaki
Journal:  Caspian J Intern Med       Date:  2013

4.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 6.  Radiomics: the process and the challenges.

Authors:  Virendra Kumar; Yuhua Gu; Satrajit Basu; Anders Berglund; Steven A Eschrich; Matthew B Schabath; Kenneth Forster; Hugo J W L Aerts; Andre Dekker; David Fenstermacher; Dmitry B Goldgof; Lawrence O Hall; Philippe Lambin; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Robert A Gatenby; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 2.546

Review 7.  Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis.

Authors:  Philippe Lambin; Emmanuel Rios-Velazquez; Ralph Leijenaar; Sara Carvalho; Ruud G P M van Stiphout; Patrick Granton; Catharina M L Zegers; Robert Gillies; Ronald Boellard; André Dekker; Hugo J W L Aerts
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Predicting Malignant Nodules from Screening CT Scans.

Authors:  Samuel Hawkins; Hua Wang; Ying Liu; Alberto Garcia; Olya Stringfield; Henry Krewer; Qian Li; Dmitry Cherezov; Robert A Gatenby; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Dmitry Goldgof; Matthew B Schabath; Lawrence Hall; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 15.609

9.  Deep Feature Transfer Learning in Combination with Traditional Features Predicts Survival Among Patients with Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Rahul Paul; Samuel H Hawkins; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Matthew B Schabath; Robert J Gillies; Lawrence O Hall; Dmitry B Goldgof
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2016-12

10.  Differences in Patient Outcomes of Prevalence, Interval, and Screen-Detected Lung Cancers in the CT Arm of the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  Matthew B Schabath; Pierre P Massion; Zachary J Thompson; Steven A Eschrich; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Dmitry Goldof; Denise R Aberle; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  22 in total

1.  Neural network training for cross-protocol radiomic feature standardization in computed tomography.

Authors:  Vincent Andrearczyk; Adrien Depeursinge; Henning Müller
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-06-06

2.  Representation of Deep Features using Radiologist defined Semantic Features.

Authors:  Rahul Paul; Ying Liu; Qian Li; Lawrence Hall; Dmitry Goldgof; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Matthew Schabath; Robert Gillies
Journal:  Proc Int Jt Conf Neural Netw       Date:  2018-09-15

3.  Classification of lung nodules based on CT images using squeeze-and-excitation network and aggregated residual transformations.

Authors:  Guobin Zhang; Zhiyong Yang; Li Gong; Shan Jiang; Lu Wang; Hongyun Zhang
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 4.  Lung Nodule Detection from Feature Engineering to Deep Learning in Thoracic CT Images: a Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Amitava Halder; Debangshu Dey; Anup K Sadhu
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Predicting Nodule Malignancy using a CNN Ensemble Approach.

Authors:  Rahul Paul; Lawrence Hall; Dmitry Goldgof; Matthew Schabath; Robert Gillies
Journal:  Proc Int Jt Conf Neural Netw       Date:  2018-10-15

6.  Hybrid models for lung nodule malignancy prediction utilizing convolutional neural network ensembles and clinical data.

Authors:  Rahul Paul; Matthew B Schabath; Robert Gillies; Lawrence O Hall; Dmitry B Goldgof
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2020-04-06

7.  Prediction of lung cancer risk at follow-up screening with low-dose CT: a training and validation study of a deep learning method.

Authors:  Peng Huang; Cheng T Lin; Yuliang Li; Martin C Tammemagi; Malcolm V Brock; Sukhinder Atkar-Khattra; Yanxun Xu; Ping Hu; John R Mayo; Heidi Schmidt; Michel Gingras; Sergio Pasian; Lori Stewart; Scott Tsai; Jean M Seely; Daria Manos; Paul Burrowes; Rick Bhatia; Ming-Sound Tsao; Stephen Lam
Journal:  Lancet Digit Health       Date:  2019-10-17

8.  Deep Convolutional Radiomic Features on Diffusion Tensor Images for Classification of Glioma Grades.

Authors:  Zhiwei Zhang; Jingjing Xiao; Shandong Wu; Fajin Lv; Junwei Gong; Lin Jiang; Renqiang Yu; Tianyou Luo
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Convolutional Neural Network ensembles for accurate lung nodule malignancy prediction 2 years in the future.

Authors:  Rahul Paul; Matthew Schabath; Robert Gillies; Lawrence Hall; Dmitry Goldgof
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.589

10.  Validation of the BRODERS classifier (Benign versus aggRessive nODule Evaluation using Radiomic Stratification), a novel HRCT-based radiomic classifier for indeterminate pulmonary nodules.

Authors:  Fabien Maldonado; Cyril Varghese; Srinivasan Rajagopalan; Fenghai Duan; Aneri B Balar; Dhairya A Lakhani; Sanja L Antic; Pierre P Massion; Tucker F Johnson; Ronald A Karwoski; Richard A Robb; Brian J Bartholmai; Tobias Peikert
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 16.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.