Rahul Paul1, Matthew B Schabath2, Robert Gillies3, Lawrence O Hall1, Dmitry B Goldgof1. 1. University of South Florida, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Tampa, Florida, United States. 2. H. L. Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Tampa, Florida, United States. 3. H. L. Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Department of Cancer Physiology, Tampa, Florida, United States.
Abstract
Purpose: Due to the high incidence and mortality rates of lung cancer worldwide, early detection of a precancerous lesion is essential. Low-dose computed tomography is a commonly used technique for screening, diagnosis, and prognosis of non-small-cell lung cancer. Recently, convolutional neural networks (CNN) had shown great potential in lung nodule classification. Clinical information (family history, gender, and smoking history) together with nodule size provide information about lung cancer risk. Large nodules have greater risk than small nodules. Approach: A subset of cases from the National Lung Screening Trial was chosen as a dataset in our study. We divided the nodules into large and small nodules based on different clinical guideline thresholds and then analyzed the groups individually. Similarly, we also analyzed clinical features by dividing them into groups. CNNs were designed and trained over each of these groups individually. To our knowledge, this is the first study to incorporate nodule size and clinical features for classification using CNN. We further made a hybrid model using an ensemble with the CNN models of clinical and size information to enhance malignancy prediction. Results: From our study, we obtained 0.9 AUC and 83.12% accuracy, which was a significant improvement over our previous best results. Conclusions: In conclusion, we found that dividing the nodules by size and clinical information for building predictive models resulted in improved malignancy predictions. Our analysis also showed that appropriately integrating clinical information and size groups could further improve risk prediction.
Purpose: Due to the high incidence and mortality rates of lung cancer worldwide, early detection of a precancerous lesion is essential. Low-dose computed tomography is a commonly used technique for screening, diagnosis, and prognosis of non-small-cell lung cancer. Recently, convolutional neural networks (CNN) had shown great potential in lung nodule classification. Clinical information (family history, gender, and smoking history) together with nodule size provide information about lung cancer risk. Large nodules have greater risk than small nodules. Approach: A subset of cases from the National Lung Screening Trial was chosen as a dataset in our study. We divided the nodules into large and small nodules based on different clinical guideline thresholds and then analyzed the groups individually. Similarly, we also analyzed clinical features by dividing them into groups. CNNs were designed and trained over each of these groups individually. To our knowledge, this is the first study to incorporate nodule size and clinical features for classification using CNN. We further made a hybrid model using an ensemble with the CNN models of clinical and size information to enhance malignancy prediction. Results: From our study, we obtained 0.9 AUC and 83.12% accuracy, which was a significant improvement over our previous best results. Conclusions: In conclusion, we found that dividing the nodules by size and clinical information for building predictive models resulted in improved malignancy predictions. Our analysis also showed that appropriately integrating clinical information and size groups could further improve risk prediction.
Authors: Douglas E Wood; Ella Kazerooni; Scott L Baum; Mark T Dransfield; George A Eapen; David S Ettinger; Lifang Hou; David M Jackman; Donald Klippenstein; Rohit Kumar; Rudy P Lackner; Lorriana E Leard; Ann N C Leung; Samir S Makani; Pierre P Massion; Bryan F Meyers; Gregory A Otterson; Kimberly Peairs; Sudhakar Pipavath; Christie Pratt-Pozo; Chakravarthy Reddy; Mary E Reid; Arnold J Rotter; Peter B Sachs; Matthew B Schabath; Lecia V Sequist; Betty C Tong; William D Travis; Stephen C Yang; Kristina M Gregory; Miranda Hughes Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-06-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Anna Rita Larici; Alessandra Farchione; Paola Franchi; Mario Ciliberto; Giuseppe Cicchetti; Lucio Calandriello; Annemilia Del Ciello; Lorenzo Bonomo Journal: Eur Respir Rev Date: 2017-12-20
Authors: Samuel Hawkins; Hua Wang; Ying Liu; Alberto Garcia; Olya Stringfield; Henry Krewer; Qian Li; Dmitry Cherezov; Robert A Gatenby; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Dmitry Goldgof; Matthew B Schabath; Lawrence Hall; Robert J Gillies Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2016-07-13 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Nichole T Tanner; Neeti M Kanodra; Mulugeta Gebregziabher; Elizabeth Payne; Chanita Hughes Halbert; Graham W Warren; Leonard E Egede; Gerard A Silvestri Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2016-03-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: David S Gierada; Paul Pinsky; Hrudaya Nath; Caroline Chiles; Fenghai Duan; Denise R Aberle Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2014-10-18 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Dmitry Cherezov; Samuel H Hawkins; Dmitry B Goldgof; Lawrence O Hall; Ying Liu; Qian Li; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Robert J Gillies; Matthew B Schabath Journal: Cancer Med Date: 2018-12-01 Impact factor: 4.452