Literature DB >> 32280729

Hybrid models for lung nodule malignancy prediction utilizing convolutional neural network ensembles and clinical data.

Rahul Paul1, Matthew B Schabath2, Robert Gillies3, Lawrence O Hall1, Dmitry B Goldgof1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Due to the high incidence and mortality rates of lung cancer worldwide, early detection of a precancerous lesion is essential. Low-dose computed tomography is a commonly used technique for screening, diagnosis, and prognosis of non-small-cell lung cancer. Recently, convolutional neural networks (CNN) had shown great potential in lung nodule classification. Clinical information (family history, gender, and smoking history) together with nodule size provide information about lung cancer risk. Large nodules have greater risk than small nodules. Approach: A subset of cases from the National Lung Screening Trial was chosen as a dataset in our study. We divided the nodules into large and small nodules based on different clinical guideline thresholds and then analyzed the groups individually. Similarly, we also analyzed clinical features by dividing them into groups. CNNs were designed and trained over each of these groups individually. To our knowledge, this is the first study to incorporate nodule size and clinical features for classification using CNN. We further made a hybrid model using an ensemble with the CNN models of clinical and size information to enhance malignancy prediction.
Results: From our study, we obtained 0.9 AUC and 83.12% accuracy, which was a significant improvement over our previous best results. Conclusions: In conclusion, we found that dividing the nodules by size and clinical information for building predictive models resulted in improved malignancy predictions. Our analysis also showed that appropriately integrating clinical information and size groups could further improve risk prediction.
© 2020 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE).

Entities:  

Keywords:  National Lung Screening Trial; convolutional neural network; ensemble; low-dose CT; non-small-cell lung cancer; radiomics

Year:  2020        PMID: 32280729      PMCID: PMC7134617          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.7.2.024502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  33 in total

1.  Lung cancer screening, version 1.2015: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines.

Authors:  Douglas E Wood; Ella Kazerooni; Scott L Baum; Mark T Dransfield; George A Eapen; David S Ettinger; Lifang Hou; David M Jackman; Donald Klippenstein; Rohit Kumar; Rudy P Lackner; Lorriana E Leard; Ann N C Leung; Samir S Makani; Pierre P Massion; Bryan F Meyers; Gregory A Otterson; Kimberly Peairs; Sudhakar Pipavath; Christie Pratt-Pozo; Chakravarthy Reddy; Mary E Reid; Arnold J Rotter; Peter B Sachs; Matthew B Schabath; Lecia V Sequist; Betty C Tong; William D Travis; Stephen C Yang; Kristina M Gregory; Miranda Hughes
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 2.  Biomarkers of risk to develop lung cancer in the new screening era.

Authors:  Thomas Atwater; Pierre P Massion
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-04

3.  Lung cancer risk by years since quitting in 30+ pack year smokers.

Authors:  Paul F Pinsky; Claire S Zhu; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.136

4.  Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.

Authors:  Denise R Aberle; Amanda M Adams; Christine D Berg; William C Black; Jonathan D Clapp; Richard M Fagerstrom; Ilana F Gareen; Constantine Gatsonis; Pamela M Marcus; JoRean D Sicks
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Lung nodules: size still matters.

Authors:  Anna Rita Larici; Alessandra Farchione; Paola Franchi; Mario Ciliberto; Giuseppe Cicchetti; Lucio Calandriello; Annemilia Del Ciello; Lorenzo Bonomo
Journal:  Eur Respir Rev       Date:  2017-12-20

6.  Predicting Malignant Nodules from Screening CT Scans.

Authors:  Samuel Hawkins; Hua Wang; Ying Liu; Alberto Garcia; Olya Stringfield; Henry Krewer; Qian Li; Dmitry Cherezov; Robert A Gatenby; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Dmitry Goldgof; Matthew B Schabath; Lawrence Hall; Robert J Gillies
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 15.609

7.  The Association between Smoking Abstinence and Mortality in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  Nichole T Tanner; Neeti M Kanodra; Mulugeta Gebregziabher; Elizabeth Payne; Chanita Hughes Halbert; Graham W Warren; Leonard E Egede; Gerard A Silvestri
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  End-to-end lung cancer screening with three-dimensional deep learning on low-dose chest computed tomography.

Authors:  Diego Ardila; Atilla P Kiraly; Sujeeth Bharadwaj; Bokyung Choi; Joshua J Reicher; Lily Peng; Daniel Tse; Mozziyar Etemadi; Wenxing Ye; Greg Corrado; David P Naidich; Shravya Shetty
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 53.440

9.  Projected outcomes using different nodule sizes to define a positive CT lung cancer screening examination.

Authors:  David S Gierada; Paul Pinsky; Hrudaya Nath; Caroline Chiles; Fenghai Duan; Denise R Aberle
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Delta radiomic features improve prediction for lung cancer incidence: A nested case-control analysis of the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  Dmitry Cherezov; Samuel H Hawkins; Dmitry B Goldgof; Lawrence O Hall; Ying Liu; Qian Li; Yoganand Balagurunathan; Robert J Gillies; Matthew B Schabath
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 4.452

View more
  1 in total

1.  Convolutional Neural Network ensembles for accurate lung nodule malignancy prediction 2 years in the future.

Authors:  Rahul Paul; Matthew Schabath; Robert Gillies; Lawrence Hall; Dmitry Goldgof
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 4.589

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.