| Literature DB >> 29564234 |
Erica Tirloni1, Cristian Bernardi1, Sandro Drago2, Giuseppe Stampone2, Francesco Pomilio3, Patrizia Cattaneo1, Simone Stella1.
Abstract
Objective of the present study was to test the performances of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP)-based method for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes, with particular focus on the dairy products. The specificity of the method was evaluated on 42 different Listeria spp. strains from collections, food and environmental samples. 100% (32 of 32) of the L. monocytogenes strains were correctly recognised, and none of other 10 Listeria spp. strains was misidentified. The sensitivity was evaluated on four L. monocytogenes strains from different sources. The instrument was able to detect 10-400 CFU/mL. The ability to detect low initial numbers of L. monocytogenes (0.3-0.7 Log CFU/g) was also evaluated, in duplicate, in pasteurised milk (whole and skimmed) and dairy samples (fresh ricotta, crescenza, mascarpone, mozzarella, cottage cheese, cream cheese, taleggio, gorgonzola). The analysis was performed after 18, 24 and 48 h of incubation, and was coupled with the count of L. monocytogenes in the broth. Microbial loads were insufficient to achieve a positive result after 18 and 24 h in most of the samples; after 48 h, all the products, except taleggio and one gorgonzola sample, were identified as positive; the sensitivity of the method when applied to contaminated dairy foods was about 5 Log CFU/g. The LAMP method tested can be considered a very useful tool, as it is a costeffective and easy-functioning method. The preliminary data obtained should be confirmed with a validation process taking into account different food typologies.Entities:
Keywords: LAMP; Listeria monocytogenes; RTE dairy food; limit of detection
Year: 2017 PMID: 29564234 PMCID: PMC5850052 DOI: 10.4081/ijfs.2017.6890
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ital J Food Saf ISSN: 2239-7132
Listeria spp. strains selected for the tests and relative results from loop-mediated isothermal amplification detection method.
| Strain | Identification | Source | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Meat | + | |
| 2 | L. monocytogenes | Meat | + |
| 3 | Food different from meat, seafood and dairy | + | |
| 4 | Food different from meat, seafood and dairy | + | |
| 5 | Food different from meat, seafood and dairy | + | |
| 6 | Food different from meat, seafood and dairy | + | |
| 7 | Food different from meat, seafood and dairy | + | |
| 8 | Food different from meat, seafood and dairy | + | |
| 9 | Dairy product | + | |
| 10 | Seafood | + | |
| 11 | Meat | + | |
| 12 | Meat | + | |
| 13 | Dairy product | + | |
| 14 | Dairy product | + | |
| 15 | Seafood | + | |
| 16 | Seafood | + | |
| 17 | Seafood | + | |
| 18 | Seafood | + | |
| 19 | Seafood | + | |
| 20 | Seafood | + | |
| 21 | Dairy product | + | |
| 22 | Dairy product | + | |
| 23 | Seafood | + | |
| 24 | Meat | + | |
| 25 | Dairy product | + | |
| 26 | Taleggio cheese | + | |
| 27 | Salami | + | |
| 28 | Smoked cooked ham | + | |
| 29 | Raw ham | + | |
| 30 | Shrimp mayonnaise cocktail | + | |
| 31 | Sandwich | + | |
| 32 | ATCC | + | |
| 33 | ATCC | - | |
| 34 | Environmental sample | - | |
| 35 | Environmental sample | - | |
| 36 | Environmental sample | - | |
| 37 | Environmental sample | - | |
| 38 | Environmental sample | - | |
| 39 | Environmental sample | - | |
| 40 | Environmental sample | - | |
| 41 | Environmental sample | - | |
| 42 | Environmental sample | - |
ATCC, American Type Culture Collection.
Figure 1.Sensitivity test results of strain 45 (A) and 49 (B).
Figure 2.Sensitivity test results of strain 99 (A) and 118 (B).
Results obtained by loop-mediated isothermal amplification detection method after 18, 24 and 48 h of incubation and relative microbial counts.
| Products | T18h | T24h | T48h | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAMP | Microbial count (Log cfu/g) | LAMP | Microbial count (Log cfu/g) | LAMP | Microbial count (Log cfu/g) | |
| Whole milk A | - | 3.4 | - | 4.7 | + | 8.0 |
| Whole milk B | - | 3.3 | - | 4.7 | + | 8.1 |
| Skim milk A | - | 3.4 | - | 4.7 | + | 8.3 |
| Skim milk B | - | 3.3 | - | 4.7 | + | 8.1 |
| Ricotta A | - | 2.5 | - | 4.3 | + | 7.9 |
| Ricotta B | - | 2.3 | - | 3.4 | + | 8 |
| Mascarpone A | - | 2.3 | - | 4.1 | + | 8.3 |
| Mascarpone B | - | 2.0 | - | 4.3 | + | 8.1 |
| Taleggio A | - | 2.3 | - | 2.5 | - | 3.3 |
| Taleggio B | - | 2.6 | - | 2.6 | - | 3.5 |
| Gorgonzola A | - | 3.2 | - | 4.2 | + | 5.8 |
| Gorgonzola B | - | 1.0 | - | 2.3 | - | 2.9 |
| Cream cheese A | - | 2.3 | - | 4.2 | + | 8.2 |
| Cream cheese B | - | 2.4 | + | 4.2 | + | 8.4 |
| Crescenza A | - | 2.6 | - | 4.3 | + | 7.7 |
| Crescenza B | - | 1.8 | - | 4.3 | + | 8.1 |
| Mozzarella A | - | 2.6 | - | 4.2 | + | 8.1 |
| Mozzarella B | - | 2.9 | - | 4.3 | + | 8.1 |
| Cottage cheese A | - | 3.3 | - | 4.5 | + | 8.2 |
| Cottage cheese B | - | 3.2 | - | 4.6 | + | 8.1 |
LAMP, loop-mediated isothermal amplification.
Figure 3.Amplification curves obtained from loop-mediated isothermal amplification identification after 48 h of subculturation.