Literature DB >> 29554176

Characteristics Associated With Preferences for Parent-Centered Decision Making in Neonatal Intensive Care.

Elliott Mark Weiss1,2, Dawei Xie3, Noah Cook4, Katherine Coughlin5, Steven Joffe6,7,8.   

Abstract

Importance: Little is known about how characteristics of particular clinical decisions influence decision-making preferences by patients or their surrogates. A better understanding of the factors underlying preferences is essential to improve the quality of shared decision making. Objective: To identify the characteristics of particular decisions that are associated with parents' preferences for family- vs medical team-centered decision making across the spectrum of clinical decisions that arise in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional survey assessed parents' preferences for parent- vs medical team-centered decision making across 16 clinical decisions, along with parents' assessments of 7 characteristics of those decisions. Respondents included 136 parents of infants in 1 of 3 academically affiliated hospital NICUs in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, from January 7 to July 8, 2016. Respondents represented a wide range of educational levels, employment status, and household income but were predominantly female (109 [80.1%]), white (68 [50.0%]) or African American (53 [39.0%]), and married (81 of 132 responding [61.4%]). Main Outcomes and Measures: Preferences for parent-centered decision making. For each decision characteristic (eg, urgency), multivariable analyses tested whether middle and high levels of that characteristic (compared with low levels) were associated with a preference for parent-centered decision making, resulting in 2 odds ratios (ORs) per decision characteristic.
Results: Among the 136 respondents (109 women [80.1%] and 27 men [19.9%]; median age, 30 years [range, 18-43 years]), preferences for parent-centered decision making were positively associated with decisions that involved big-picture goals (middle OR, 2.01 [99% CI, 0.83-4.86]; high OR, 3.38 [99% CI, 1.48-7.75]) and that had the potential to harm the infant (middle OR, 1.32 [99% CI, 0.84-2.08]; high OR, 2.62 [99% CI, 1.67-4.11]). In contrast, preferences for parent-centered decision making were inversely associated with the following 4 decision characteristics: technical decisions (middle OR, 0.82 [99% CI, 0.45-1.52]; high OR, 0.48 [99% CI, 0.25-0.93]), the potential to benefit the infant (middle OR, 0.42 [99% CI, 0.16-1.05]; high OR, 0.21 [99% CI, 0.08-0.52]), requires medical expertise (middle OR, 0.48 [99% CI, 0.22-1.05]; high OR, 0.21 [99% CI, 0.10-0.48]), and a high level of urgency (middle OR, 0.47 [99% CI, 0.24-0.92]; high OR, 0.42 [99% CI, 0.22-0.83]). Conclusions and Relevance: Preferences for parent-centered vs medical team-centered decision making among parents of infants in the NICU may vary systematically by the characteristics of particular clinical decisions. Incorporating this variation into shared decision making and endorsing models that allow parents to cede control to physicians in appropriate clinical circumstances might improve the quality and outcomes of medical decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29554176      PMCID: PMC5875325          DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5776

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Pediatr        ISSN: 2168-6203            Impact factor:   16.193


  33 in total

1.  Policy statement--postnatal corticosteroids to prevent or treat bronchopulmonary dysplasia.

Authors:  Kristi L Watterberg
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-09-06       Impact factor: 7.124

2.  Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients.

Authors:  J Ende; L Kazis; A Ash; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Four models of the physician-patient relationship.

Authors:  E J Emanuel; L L Emanuel
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992 Apr 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Measuring men's preferences for involvement in medical care: getting the question right.

Authors:  Melina Gattellari; Jeanette E Ward
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.431

5.  Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate?

Authors:  N K Arora; C A McHorney
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Maternal experiences making a decision about heart surgery for their young children with congenital heart disease.

Authors:  Shu-Fan Lan; Pei-Fan Mu; Kai-Sheng Hsieh
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.036

7.  Validation of screening questions for limited health literacy in a large VA outpatient population.

Authors:  Lisa D Chew; Joan M Griffin; Melissa R Partin; Siamak Noorbaloochi; Joseph P Grill; Annamay Snyder; Katharine A Bradley; Sean M Nugent; Alisha D Baines; Michelle Vanryn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Evolving neonatal steroid prescription habits and patient outcomes.

Authors:  Etienne Fortin-Pellerin; Claire Petersen; Francine Lefebvre; Keith J Barrington; Annie Janvier
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 2.299

9.  Living with a crucial decision: a qualitative study of parental narratives three years after the loss of their newborn in the NICU.

Authors:  Laurence Caeymaex; Mario Speranza; Caroline Vasilescu; Claude Danan; Marie-Michèle Bourrat; Micheline Garel; Catherine Jousselme
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Cancer patients: their desire for information and participation in treatment decisions.

Authors:  H J Sutherland; H A Llewellyn-Thomas; G A Lockwood; D L Tritchler; J E Till
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 18.000

View more
  5 in total

1.  The importance of shared decision-making in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  Frank Soltys; Sydney E Philpott-Streiff; Lindsay Fuzzell; Mary C Politi
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 2.  Historical Perspectives: Shared Decision Making in the NICU.

Authors:  Anne Sullivan; Christy Cummings
Journal:  Neoreviews       Date:  2020-04

3.  Parental Factors Associated With the Decision to Participate in a Neonatal Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Elliott Mark Weiss; Aleksandra E Olszewski; Katherine F Guttmann; Brooke E Magnus; Sijia Li; Anita R Shah; Sandra E Juul; Yvonne W Wu; Kaashif A Ahmad; Ellen Bendel-Stenzel; Natalia A Isaza; Andrea L Lampland; Amit M Mathur; Rakesh Rao; David Riley; David G Russell; Zeynep N I Salih; Carrie B Torr; Joern-Hendrik Weitkamp; Uchenna E Anani; Taeun Chang; Juanita Dudley; John Flibotte; Erin M Havrilla; Charmaine M Kathen; Alexandra C O'Kane; Krystle Perez; Brenda J Stanley; Benjamin S Wilfond; Seema K Shah
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-01-04

4.  Ethical considerations in the care of encephalopathic neonates treated with therapeutic hypothermia.

Authors:  Monica E Lemmon; Courtney J Wusthoff; Renee D Boss; Lisa Anne Rasmussen
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2021-06-12       Impact factor: 3.726

Review 5.  A review of approaches for resolving disputes between physicians and families on end-of-life care for newborns.

Authors:  Brian M Cummings; Mark R Mercurio; John J Paris
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.521

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.