Literature DB >> 34176763

Ethical considerations in the care of encephalopathic neonates treated with therapeutic hypothermia.

Monica E Lemmon1, Courtney J Wusthoff2, Renee D Boss3, Lisa Anne Rasmussen4.   

Abstract

Engaging with ethical issues is central to the management of neonatal encephalopathy (NE). As treatment for these neonates evolves, new ethical issues will arise and many existing challenges will remain. We highlight three key ethical issues that arise in the care of neonates with NE treated with therapeutic hypothermia: facilitating shared decision making, understanding futility, and defining the boundaries between standard of care and research. Awareness of these issues will help clinicians counsel families in light of evolving treatments and outcomes.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision making; Futility; Prognosis

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34176763      PMCID: PMC8627487          DOI: 10.1016/j.siny.2021.101258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med        ISSN: 1744-165X            Impact factor:   3.726


  59 in total

1.  Uncertainty--the other side of prognosis.

Authors:  Alexander K Smith; Douglas B White; Robert M Arnold
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Key Concepts for Informed Health Choices: a framework for helping people learn how to assess treatment claims and make informed choices.

Authors:  Iain Chalmers; Andrew D Oxman; Astrid Austvoll-Dahlgren; Selena Ryan-Vig; Sarah Pannell; Nelson Sewankambo; Daniel Semakula; Allen Nsangi; Loai Albarqouni; Paul Glasziou; Kamal Mahtani; David Nunan; Carl Heneghan; Douglas Badenoch
Journal:  BMJ Evid Based Med       Date:  2018-02

3.  Decision-Making for Children with Disabilities: Parental Discretion and Moral Ambiguity.

Authors:  Douglas S Diekema; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.416

4.  Is the best interest standard good for pediatrics?

Authors:  Rosamond Rhodes; Ian R Holzman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 5.  Parental refusals of medical treatment: the harm principle as threshold for state intervention.

Authors:  Douglas S Diekema
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2004

6.  Neurologic Outcome After Prematurity: Perspectives of Parents and Clinicians.

Authors:  Monica E Lemmon; Hanna Huffstetler; Mary Carol Barks; Christine Kirby; Madelaine Katz; Peter A Ubel; Sharron L Docherty; Debra Brandon
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Ethical justifications for access to unapproved medical interventions: an argument for (limited) patient obligations.

Authors:  Mary Jean Walker; Wendy A Rogers; Vikki Entwistle
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 11.229

8.  Defining Futile and Potentially Inappropriate Interventions: A Policy Statement From the Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee.

Authors:  Alexander A Kon; Eric K Shepard; Nneka O Sederstrom; Sandra M Swoboda; Mary Faith Marshall; Barbara Birriel; Fred Rincon
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.598

9.  Informed Consent in Decision-Making in Pediatric Practice.

Authors:  Aviva L Katz; Sally A Webb
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 10.  Historical Perspectives: Shared Decision Making in the NICU.

Authors:  Anne Sullivan; Christy Cummings
Journal:  Neoreviews       Date:  2020-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.