Literature DB >> 10718358

Patient preferences for medical decision making: who really wants to participate?

N K Arora1, C A McHorney.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify the determinants of patient preferences for participation in medical decision making.
METHODS: Data were analyzed for 2,197 patients from the Medical Outcomes Study, a 4-year observational study of patients with chronic disease (hypertension, diabetes, myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, and depression). Multivariate logistic regression models estimated the effects of patients' sociodemographic, clinical, psychosocial, and lifestyle characteristics on their decision-making preferences.
RESULTS: A majority of the patients (69%) preferred to leave their medical decisions to their physicians. The odds for preferring an active role significantly decreased with age and increased with education. Women were more likely to be active than men (odds ratio [OR] = 1.44, P < 0.001). Compared with patients who only suffered with unsevere hypertension, those with severe diabetes (OR = 0.62, P = 0.04) and unsevere heart disease (OR = 0.45, P = 0.02) were less likely to prefer an active role. Patients with clinical depression were more likely to be active (OR = 1.64, P = 0.01). Patients pursuing active coping strategies had higher odds for an active role than "passive" copers, while those who placed higher value on their health were less likely to be active than those with low health value (OR = 0.59, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Although a majority of patients prefer to delegate decision making to physicians, preferences vary significantly by patient characteristics. Approaches to enhancing patient involvement will need to be flexible and accommodating to individual preferences in order to maximize the benefits of patient participation on health outcomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10718358     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200003000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  159 in total

1.  Arthritis patients' motives for (not) wanting to be involved in medical decision-making and the factors that hinder or promote patient involvement.

Authors:  Ingrid Nota; Constance H C Drossaert; Erik Taal; Mart A F J van de Laar
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Clinical trial participation and time to treatment among adolescents and young adults with cancer: does age at diagnosis or insurance make a difference?

Authors:  Helen M Parsons; Linda C Harlan; Nita L Seibel; Jennifer L Stevens; Theresa H M Keegan
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Oncologists' assessments of lung cancer patient and family disagreements regarding treatment decision making.

Authors:  Laura A Siminoff; Lindsey Dorflinger; Amma Agyemang; Sherman Baker; Maureen Wilson-Genderson
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 5.705

4.  An empirical study of surrogates' preferred level of control over value-laden life support decisions in intensive care units.

Authors:  Sara K Johnson; Christopher A Bautista; Seo Yeon Hong; Lisa Weissfeld; Douglas B White
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Patient-centered discussions about prostate cancer screening: a real-world approach.

Authors:  Barak Gaster; Kelly Edwards; Susan Brown Trinidad; Thomas H Gallagher; Clarence H Braddock
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Surrogate decision-making in Korean patients with advanced cancer: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  June Koo Lee; Bhumsuk Keam; Ah Reum An; Tae Min Kim; Se-Hoon Lee; Dong-Wan Kim; Dae Seog Heo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Does physician communication style impact patient report of decision quality for breast cancer treatment?

Authors:  Kathryn A Martinez; Ken Resnicow; Geoffrey C Williams; Marlene Silva; Paul Abrahamse; Dean A Shumway; Lauren P Wallner; Steven J Katz; Sarah T Hawley
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-06-22

8.  Using conjoint analysis to model the preferences of different patient segments for attributes of patient-centered care.

Authors:  Charles E Cunningham; Ken Deal; Heather Rimas; Heather Campbell; Ann Russell; Jennifer Henderson; Anne Matheson; Blake Melnick
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

9.  Views of treatment decision making from adolescents with chronic illnesses and their parents: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jennifer M Knopf; Richard W Hornung; Gail B Slap; Robert F DeVellis; Maria T Britto
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.377

10.  Characteristics Associated With Preferences for Parent-Centered Decision Making in Neonatal Intensive Care.

Authors:  Elliott Mark Weiss; Dawei Xie; Noah Cook; Katherine Coughlin; Steven Joffe
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 16.193

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.